Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian railway companies act 1895 Court: delhi Page 87 of about 10,415 results (0.091 seconds)

Mar 05 2001 (HC)

Controller of Estate Duty Vs. Smt. Veeran Wali

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [2001]250ITR71(Delhi)

..... he is a mere trustee for him. in other words, a benami purchase or conveyance leads to a resulting trust in india. the general rule and principle of the indian law as to resulting trusts differs but little if at all, from the general rule of english law upon the same subject. the liability to pay estate duty under section ..... the deceased who was entitled to deal with the same as if it were his own and the accountable person held it in trust under section 82 of the indian trusts act, 1882 (hereinafter referred to as 'the trusts act'), for the benefit of the deceased. the benamidar subject to the euities flowing from section 41 of the transfer of property ..... so far as the case is concerned. they read as follows :'5. levy of estate duty. (1) in the case of every person dying after the commencement of this act, there shall, save as hereinafter expressly pro vided, be levied and paid upon the principal value ascertained as herein after provided of all property, settled or not settled, including .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 23 2005 (HC)

Ravi N. Tikoo Vs. Deputy Commissioner (S.W.) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 128(2006)DLT267; [2006(109)FLR955]; 2006(3)SLJ118(Delhi)

..... thus, the management could have ranged from being a public limited company/private limited company incorporated under the indian companies act, or could have been a partnership firm under the indian partnership act or a sole proprietorship firm, or a society registered under the societies registration act or an association/organisation. the status of the management is completely ..... air2003sc4630 entitled citi bank n.a. v. standard chartered bank and ors., the apex court held thus:-36. illustration (g) of section 114 of the indian evidence act provides that the court may presume 'that evidence which could be and is not produced would, if produced, be unfavorable to the person who holds it'. ..... far as the effect of failure to produce evidence which is in the power and possession of a party, illustration (g) of section 114 of the indian evidence act provides that the court may presume that evidence which could be and is not produced, would if produced, be unfavorable to the person holds it. in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 2006 (HC)

Dy. Cit, Non Resident Circle, New Delhi Vs. Metapath Software Internat ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [2006]9SOT305(NULL)

..... also submitted that two expatriates, chris denley and howard martindale were deputed to india to assist in the set up, establishment and on-going operations of an indian company [metapath software international (india) private limited ('msi india')], incorporated as a joint venture with bharti cellular limited. that both these individuals were in the country ..... during the financial year in which the hardware was sold in india, the assessed did have an equity stake in a joint venture company with bharti telecom. however, the indian joint-venture company was only incorporated on 23-12-1996, which was subsequent to the period when all the hardware was sold by the assessed ..... were being borne by the indian joint venture company. the assessed also submitted that income from supply of hardware in india is not taxable for the following reasons. that under the provisions of section 9(1)(i) of the act, income derived by the assessed from supply of hardware to indian customers would be taxable in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 30 2010 (HC)

Siddarth VarmA.Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation,(Cbi).

Court : Delhi

..... 1992 and 13th october, 1992 respectively. the sources for this investment, as per cbi, were his father's ill-gotten money. this accused was shown working in four companies (i.e m/s indus global, m/s jubilee enterprises ltd., m/s jubilee medicare ltd. and m/s prasuti construction and investment (p) ltd.) to show ..... income was fictitious income just to legalize the ill-gotten money of his father. considering all aspects, the appellant was charged under prevention of corruption act read with section 109 of ipc.5. i consider that learned special judge rightly dismissed the application of the petitioner for discharge. charges were framed against two accused persons, against ..... 4. the accused/petitioner siddharth verma was summoned by the court for offences under section 13(2) and 13(1)(e) of prevention of corruption act read with section 109 of ipc. his father was found indulging into corruption and amassing wealth during the period from 23rd july, 1964 to 31st march, 2001. accused siddharth verma .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2012 (HC)

Vishal Exports Overseas Limited Vs. Humburg Bulk Carriers, Gmbh

Court : Delhi

..... cargo. this was the b/l, a negotiable document on which reliance was placed by the bankers and insurance companies as well as innocent holders in due course. he referred to the indian carriage of goods by sea act, 1925 (cgsa) and article iii rule 3 of the hague rules which placed a statutory duty on the master ..... of the c/p the disputes between the parties were to be settled in india in accordance with the provisions of arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 ('act') and under the maritime arbitration rules of the indian council of arbitration, new delhi ('ira'). however, the parties agreed to treat the arbitration clause as an ad hoc arbitration before the ..... to proceedings before an arbitrator. p.b. mukharji, j. as the learned chief justice then was, expressed the above view in haji ebrahim kassam cochinwall v. northern indian oil industries ltd. air1951cal230. and we are of the opinion that this represents the correct statement of law on this aspect. lord goddard, c.j. in mediterranean and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 27 2012 (HC)

Rohit Shekhar Vs. Narayan Dutt Tiwari and Another

Court : Delhi

..... to negate the argument of the counsel for the respondent no.1 of such access and was sufficient in law to rebut the presumption under section 112 of the indian evidence act; ii. that the protective jurisdiction of the court under section 112 was not imperiled since declaration was sought by the child about his true paternity; iii. ..... judge directing dna test, observes/finds/holds:- a. a distinction has to be drawn between legitimacyand paternityof the child; b. section 112 of the indian evidence act, 1872 is intended to safeguard the interest of the child by securing his/her legitimacy and not to paternity; c. that a child has a right to know ..... interim orders (see kailash chander sharma v. nirmala wati 92 (2001) dlt 103), for restoring status quo ante and even for execution of local commissions is common (see indian express newspapers (bombay) p. ltd. v. t.m. nagarajan manu/de/0382/1987). the jurisprudence has been evolving. finding the interim orders in the cases of infringement .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 28 2012 (HC)

Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd and Another Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

..... do some violence to the words" and so achieve that obvious intention and produce a rational construction as held by the court in the case of ajit investment company private limited, jamnagar, gujarat and anr. v. k.g. malvadkar and ors., air 1973 bom. 285 lord denning in his book 'the discipline of ..... 'packaged drinking water' as defined hereinabove is comprehensive in its term, which takes into account the water that, is being manufactured and processed by the petitioners' companies. the impugned amendments, in our considered opinion, cannot be characterised as arbitrary, capricious, unreasonable and unjust as complained by the petitioners.12. the court also ..... , marking, quality certification of goods and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. taking note of certain provisions of the act and the rules framed the court held that the indian standards which are otherwise voluntary and available to public can be made as a binding requirement by any legislation or by specific .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 23 2012 (HC)

Harpreet Singh and Others Vs. State of Delhi

Court : Delhi

..... , for purpose of being tried by a court-martial. explanation. in this section- (a) "unit" includes a regiment, corps, ship, detachment, group, battalion or company. (b) "court-martial" includes any tribunal with the powers similar to those of a court-martial constituted under the relevant law applicable to the armed forces of the union ..... learned additional session judge that the four appellants had common intention to commit the said robbery and, therefore, they were liable for the offence under section 394 ipc. learned additional session judge has held that the second robbery was committed by harpreet and satyender. after slapping the prosecutrix, they had taken out rs.120 ..... the question of exclusive jurisdiction of the ordinary criminal courts. the offences under sections 366 and 394 ipc were interlinked and connected intrinsically with the offence under section 376 ipc. in such cases, section 70 of the army act should be and has to be applied. the reason and logic behind it is that there .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 21 2012 (HC)

Nathu Sweets Vs. Sarvesh Chand Gupta

Court : Delhi

..... the ld. rc has unnecessarily gone into the merits of the case and decided in favour of the respondent that as per the applicability of section 116 of the indian evidence act, the petitioner is estopped from questioning the title of the respondent. no doubt the amendment which seeks to displace the plaintiffs completely from the admissions made in the ..... landlord tenant and that the same could not be denied at the present stage due to the bar imposed by the rule of estoppel u/s 11.of the indian evidence act.8. the ld. rc, on hearing the counsels for the parties held that by the proposed amendment, the petitioner intended to deny the fact that the respondent ..... the respondent submitted that since the petitioner was a tenant under the respondent, the same cannot be controverted at this stage, as it was barred u/s 11.of the indian evidence act.5. in the submissions before the ld. rc, the ld. counsel for the petitioner brought the attention of the court to the judgment in d. satyanarayana v. p .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 27 2013 (HC)

Adidas India Marketing Private Ltd Vs. Hicare India Properties Pvt Ltd

Court : Delhi

..... in a district in which, and it they have been executed on or after the date on which. act no. xvi of 1864, or the indian registration act 1866, or the indian registration act. 1871. or the indian registration act, 1877, or this act came or comes into force, namely, xxx xxx xxx (d) lease of immovable property from year to year ..... pleaded to show that clause 5 relating to lock-in-period was a genuine preestimate of damages which by the petitioner would have suffered in case the respondent company had vacated the premises. no such special circumstances have been highlighted and pointed out.11. the decision in the case of food corporation of india and ..... petitioner for completion of formalities of transferring the lease in the name of the respondent and getting it signed. by another communication dated 15.12.2008 petitioner company wrote to the respondent offering them a proposal for a profit sharing agreement which was declined by the respondent.5. thereafter vide termination notice dated 06.03 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //