Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian railway companies act 1895 Court: delhi Page 84 of about 10,415 results (0.099 seconds)

Oct 18 2016 (HC)

All India Kabadi Mazdoor Mahasangh vs.new Delhi Municipal Council and ...

Court : Delhi

..... and the sole beneficiaries of the failure on the part of the respondent no.1/ndmc to roll out any scheme are private companies who would be involved in recycling of solid waste. it is claimed that such an act on the part of the respondent no.1/council amounts to dereliction of its obligations under the rules and violation of articles ..... pickers and the said cooperatives will be assigned the task of running the toilet blocks. in support of the said submission a copy of the newspaper article published in the indian express in january, 2016 has been enclosed with the present petition as annexure p 3. it has been further averred in the petition that the scheme proposed by the respondent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 2017 (HC)

Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp & Anr vs.vinod Jadhav & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... plaintiffs to pass an ex parte ad interim injunction as the plaintiffs are having an apprehension that the said product may be launched by the defendants any time in the indian market in the near future.3. this application was heard at length by this court on 14.10.2014, where it relied on the submission of the learned ..... in respect to sitagliptin.2. brief facts of this application are that the plaintiffs are the registered patentee for drug sitagliptin having an indian patent no.209816. the said drug was approved for sale in the indian market on 28.03.2008. thereafter plaintiff no.1 is selling the said drug in india under the trademark januvia and janumet. the ..... therein. 6. the certification of validity issued by this court reads as follows:-""certification of validity under section113 patents act, 1970: it is certified that in civil suit being cs(os) 586 of 2013, the validity of claims 1-20 of indian patent no.209816 (the cs(os) 3132/2014 page 3 of 4 suit patent) had been contested by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 2017 (HC)

m/s.antex Pharma Pvt Ltd vs.pureca Laboratories (P) Ltd & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... to cs(comm) 1315 /2016 page 3 of 9 4. in the plaint it is stated that, the plaintiff is amongst one of the largest and highly reputed pharmaceutical companies in india and is known for specialty medicines like anti-retroviral, anti-asthmatics, antibiotics, anti-fungal, etc. it is stated that plaintiff launched a new liver tonic syrup range ..... pertaining thereto by the defendants, amounts to misrepresentation and misappropriation of the plaintiff s goodwill in the trade mark livon-ds and their packaging. he states that such act constitutes unfair competition and dilution and sale of such infringing goods by the defendants would lead to the sale of spurious goods.13. he states that the sale of ..... the brand name livon-ds, in the year 2009. it is stated that the trademark application for the mark livon-ds under class 5 of the trade marks act, 1999 is still pending.5. it is stated in the plaint that the plaintiff s liver tonic syrup is manufactured and marketed under the trade mark livon-ds in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 12 2018 (HC)

Ashwini Shourie vs.directorate of Estates and Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... directions under section 340 when proceedings are pending, i.e that the offence alleged is committed (punishable under section 195 indian penal code) after the document is in the custody of court. reliance was placed on the decision in sachida nand singh v. state of bihar 1998 (2) ..... urged the court not to issue any direction under section 340. he urged that such orders are made in unusual cases, where the record reveals that the alleged act or omission has resulted or is likely to result in substantial injury. furthermore, the learned senior counsel argued that the court should in any case desist from issuing ..... and it was forged and fabricated in connivance with mr. manuvel mezhukanal after 19.09.2015. thus, it is submitted that the court should take cognizance of the act of filing of the false affidavit(s)/statements/forged and fabricated partnership deed by the appellant.8. shourie s reply resists the applicant, by stating that, inter alia, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 19 2018 (HC)

Snecma vs.union of India and Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... petitioner has filed applications under rules 137 and 138 (unamended rules) for correction of irregularity and/ or for condonation of delay in filing the application for entering the indian national phase which ought to be considered on merits and that the impugned communications can have no bearing on it. 12.1 argument, therefore, is that, whether or ..... in the given facts and circumstances of the 1 137. powers of controller generally. any document for the amendment of which no special provision is made in the act may be amended and any irregularity in procedure which in the opinion of the controller may be obviated without detriment to the interests of any person, may be corrected ..... 7 of 10 case, if the controller reaches a conclusion that an amendment could be ordered in a document qua which there is no special provision in the act or any irregularity in procedure could be obviated, he may order correction without causing detriment to the interest of any person on terms thought fit by him. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 2018 (HC)

Adit Engineering Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs.state & Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... no.2 being the director of accused no.1 as well as owner / landlord of the inspected premises have been active abettors within the meaning of section 150 of the indian electricity act, 2003 with the accused no.3 & 4 in having committed the offence. 18. a coordinate bench of this court in rameshwar @ kanwar singh vs. bses rajdhani power ..... dlt679relied upon by both the sides this court noted that the electricity connection was in the name of hindustan petroleum corporation ltd. and the license was issued by the company to its agent, in such a situation the responsibility of hindustan petroleum corporation ltd. and the duty to do regular inspection and keep a check at the petrol pump ..... consumer of crl.m.c.2817/2014 page 7 of 11 electricity & accused no.2 dheeraj gupta is the director of the accused no.1 company and as such an agent of the company who permitted accused no.. 3 and 4 to use the electricity connection which was sanctioned to the accused no.1. the theft found being committed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 04 2018 (HC)

Harjinder Pal Singh vs.the Collector of Stamps Sub-Divisional Magistra ...

Court : Delhi

..... district court ). by the impugned order, the district court has rejected the appeal 2. preferred by the petitioner under section 47a(4) of the indian stamp act, 1899 (hereafter the stamp act ), against the order dated 24.11.2017 passed by the respondent. the district court has upheld the decision rendered by the respondent directing the petitioner ..... v. the chief controlling revenue authority and anr. had occasion to consider almost a similar situation. this court noticed that article 23 of schedule 1a to the indian stamp act 1899 had come up for consideration before various high courts on a number of occasions. approving the view taken in raman chetty v. mohammed ghouse, sakharam shankar ..... fixing of the market value of the property in question. in the aforesaid context, the supreme court had observed as under:-" 5.the object of the indian stamp act is to collect proper stamp duty on an instrument or conveyance on which such duty is payable. this is to protect the state revenue. it is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 12 2019 (HC)

Akshansh Gupta vs.department of Science & Technology & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... the beginning, the very first sentence of the book no pity [ joseph p. shapiro, no pity: people with disabilities forging a new civil rights movement (indian reprint by universal book traders, new delhi 1993)]. authored by joseph p. shapiro reads: non-disabled americans do not understand disabled ones. the only error in ..... scholarship, in appropriate cases, to students with benchmark disabilities.43. persons with benchmark disability is defined, in clause (r) of section 2 of the rpwd act, already reproduced hereinabove, as including, inter alia, persons with not less than 40% of a specified disability, where the specified disability has not been defined in ..... third language courses; (j) (k) to promote research to improve learning; and any other measures, as may be required. 21. chapter vi of the rpwd act contains special provisions for persons with benchmark disability . section 32, thereunder, reads thus:22. all government institutions of higher 32.(1) education and other higher education .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 31 2019 (HC)

Sanjay vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... also inadmissible confession. the confession herein cannot even be called an extra-judicial confession because of the presence of the police. according to section 25 of the indian evidence act 1860, no credence can be placed upon the confession made by the accused which reads as under:25. confession to police officer not to be proved no ..... in the present case the prosecution is relying upon the testimony of pw-10 (sushila) to prove that the appellant was the last person who was seen in the company of the deceased, however, a close scrutiny of the evidence of pw-10 (sushila) alongwith other incriminating circumstances, it has not been established by the prosecution that the ..... lacunae in the case of prosecution in establishing the motive on the part of the appellant for commission of the said offence punishable under section 302 of the indian penal code.37. henceforth in the instant appeal before us, the prosecution has failed to link the chain of circumstances so as to dispel the cloud of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 11 2019 (HC)

Commissioner of Customs (Import) vs.m/s Trinetra Impex Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

..... respondent. as per the charge-sheet, placed on record, fir under section 120b of the indian penal code read with sections 420/467/468/471 of the indian penal code has been filed against mr. shyam mehrotra, proprietor of m/s anurag trading company, kanpur and mr. anand mehrotra, manager and authorized signatory of m/s anurag trading ..... was not established. (emphasis supplied) 9. the incident that resulted in the initiation of parallel proceedings against the respondent under customs broker licensing regulations and the customs act, 1962 is the same. thus, the facts noted in the order dated 11.12.2017 assume significance and on perusal of the same, it clearly emerges that the ..... the importer. there is no active role attributed to the respondent, which justifies the imposition of the penalty under section 112 (b) and section 114aa of the act. nothing has emerged even in the criminal investigation.11. in respect of the show cause notice dated 08.07.2011, the imposition of the penalty has been .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //