Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian railway companies act 1895 Court: delhi Page 1 of about 10,415 results (0.172 seconds)

Universal Music India Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [2008]87SCL51(Delhi)

..... to have issued a letter dated 19th january, 2005 requiring the petitioner to serve a copy of its contemplated petition under section 397 and 398 of the companies act, 1956 on the indian performing right society. this communication of the respondent has been impugned in the present writ petition and deserves to be considered in extenso and reads thus:to ..... bench of this court and placed upon g.s. harmal v. union of india (1971) 2 delhi 129 wherein reliance was upon amalender ghosh v. district traffic superintendent, north eastern railway : (1960)iillj61sc ; champaklal chimanlal shal v. union of india : (1964)illj752sc ; state of u.p. v. akbar ali khan : (1967)illj70sc and parry-jones v. law ..... ) 1 wlr 1062 observed:one must not, of course, construe even a reserved judgment of even russell l.j. as if it were an act of parliament.and, in herrington v. british railways board (1972) 2 wlr 537 lord morris said:there is always peril in treating the words of a speech or judgment as though they are .....

S.S. Chawla and Company Vs. Globe Motors Ltd.(In Liquidation) and Anot ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [1987]62CompCas815(Delhi)

..... rule a category for priority in payment which is not included in that section.' 23. section 530 of the companies act, 1956, is similar to section 230 of the indian companies act, 1913. thereforee, the same reasoning will apply to the interpretation of rule 157 of the companies (court) rules, 1959. 24. the supreme court then referred to oak pits colliery co,'s case [1882] 21 ..... ltd. : air1956all586 . 20. that case certainly supports him. it was concerned with the interpretation of rule 97 of the company rules made by the allahabad high court under the indian companies act of 1913. that rule was verbatim the same as rule 157 of the companies (court) rules, 1959, which i have quoted. a division bench of the allahabad high court held, in that case .....

Detecon Indian Project Office Vs. Income Tax Officer and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1994IIIAD(Delhi)278; 55(1994)DLT456; 1994(29)DRJ527

..... of paras 13 and 15 of the petition would reveal that as per the petitioner the salaries and the taxes there on used to be paid by the indian railways and that the petitioner company acting merely 'as a conduit', used to hand over the full salaries so received, to the expatriate employees without deducting any tax and that the income tax received from ..... under: 'the reading of the above clause (clause 29) clearly implies that the indian railways takes care of all the tax liabilities of the foreign company. this means the indian railways would be the agent for the non-resident company. indian railways have, thereforee, the abundant duty of ensuring the compliance of the indian income-tax act in regard to payment of various salaries and other related matters which as .....

Detecon Indian Project Office Vs. Income-tax Officer and Others.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : (1994)123CTR(Del)416; [1994]210ITR260(Delhi)

..... perusal of paragraph 13 and 15 of the petition would reveal that as per the petitioner, the salaries and the taxes thereon used to be paid by the indian railways and that the petitioner-company acting merely 'as a conduit' used to hand over the full salaries so received, to the expatriate employees without deducting any tax and that the income-tax received from ..... as under :'a reading of the above clause (clause 29) clearly implies that the indian railways takes care of all the tax liabilities of the foreign company. this means the indian railways would be the agent for the non-resident company. indian railways have, thereforee, the bounden duty of ensuring compliance with indian income-tax act in regard to payment of various salaries and other related matters which as per .....

Cit Vs. Indian Railway Construction Co. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [2009]184TAXMAN299(Delhi)

..... of railways. it is engaged in the manufacturing of large number of items such as ballast, concrete sleepers, specialised mechanical track laying/relaying ..... under section 80hh and section 80-i of the act. before narrating the said issue and stipulating the questions of law that arise for consideration in these appeals, we may recapitulate the factual background under which these issues arise.2. the assessee, namely, indian railway construction company ltd. is a public sector company incorporated under the companies act and is under the administrative control of the ministry .....

A.N. Gupta Vs. Public Enterprises Selection Board (Pesb) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2003VAD(Delhi)364

..... and another versus s. jayarajan : (1996)iillj735sc and two others judgments of this court reported as m. gopalkrishnaiah versus union of india 1994 (30) drj and m/s indian railway construction company ltd. and ors. versus lt. col. a.k. dogra (retd.) : (1993)iillj45del .8. it is also submitted that no adverse material was ever communicated to ..... w.e.f 11.1.2001, in the first instance or till the age of superannuation whichever is earlier and in accordance with the provision of the companies act. the appointment may, however, be terminated even during this period by either side on three months notice or on payment of three months salary in lieu thereof ..... 04th october, 2002 was stayed. it appears that the respondent had simultaneously started appraising the work of the petitioner which, according to the petitioner, was an illegal act on their part having been resorted to after the stay was granted by this court on 09th october, 2002. petitioner, thereforee, filed the present writ petition for .....

Dsidc Workers Union (Regd.) Vs. Delhi State Indu.Devp. Corporation (Ds ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1999VIAD(Delhi)220; 83(2000)DLT26

..... the position stated by the respondents in the counter-affidavit, particularly, that merger would take place in accordance with the procedure laid down in indian companies act etc., the petitioner has no legal right and or locus standi to challenge this merger. the matter of merger is a policy decision and such ..... the record. it is also explained that the merger would take place after following the procedure laid down under sections 391 to 394 of the indian companies act and scheme of merger would be made, which shall be filed before central government for approval. thus respondent shall follow the proper procedure laid ..... with change of policy regarding promotion, even if promotional chances of officers are affected, court would not interfere.6. similarly, in indian railway service of mechanical engineers association and others vs . indian railway traffic service association & anr. : (1993)iillj539sc , the supreme court held that unless the executive transgress their constitution limit or .....

M/S Ambujja Hotels and Real Estates (P) Ltd.Vs. Tourism Corporation Lt ...

Court : Delhi

..... catering and hospitality services for indian railways and for providing hygienic food and better services to the passengers travelling from one part to the other ..... contract but also directed the appellant to hand over catering services to the respondent-indian railway catering & tourism corporation ltd. (in short, "irctc") positively by 09th june, 2010.2. the relevant facts of the present case are that the respondent- irctc is a company duly incorporated and registered under the companies act, 1956 established inter alia for the purposes of upgrading, running and managing the .....

National Research Development Corporation Vs. M/S Industrial Carbon an ...

Court : Delhi

..... which is the national physical laboratory, developed the know-how, used for the manufacture of sig contacts. sig contacts are used in signalling equipment installed by the indian railways. evidently, csir, assigned the know-how for impregnating silver into graphite, to nrdc. 2.2 nrdc, in turn, executed a license on 30.03. ..... the same have arisen in the background of the following facts and circumstances. 2.1 nrdc, which is a public sector enterprise, stands incorporated under the companies act, 1956. the main object of its incorporation is development, promotion, licensing and exploitation of technology and information, which includes technical and industrial know-how. it ..... the defendants, was kept back. the arbitrator ought to have drawn an adverse inference based on the principles analogous to section 114(g) of the indian evidence act, 1872. an adverse inference, quite plainly, could have been drawn against the defendants, more particularly, defendant no.3, once he came to the conclusion .....

Pawan Singh and ors., Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 112(2004)DLT420; 2004(75)DRJ739

..... commuting population, from time to time. ultimately the government approved the mrts project. to undertake this project the dmrc was incorporated as a company under the indian companies act, 1956. immediately it started the project in right earnestness. it is not necessary to state in detail this project. the petitioners are candid ..... december, 2003 challenging these acquisition proceedings.7. apart from raising the issue of validity of the acquisition of the land under the la act, instead of metro railways act, the petitioners have also contended that initially the plan was to acquire the land adjacent to the petitioners' land. the respondent no. ..... building and structure'. still, the legislature, in its wisdom, decided to provide separate definitions for 'building' and 'land' in the metro railways act. likewise, section 6 of the metro railways act does not restrict the acquisition of land but specifically provides for the acquisition of the following:-a) any land, building, street, road or .....