Court : Delhi
..... and in-laws. the conversation between the two accused in the immediate presence of the police officers is hit by section 26 of the indian evidence act and hence cannot be relied upon. further, the mobile phone page 3 of 15 which was used to record the conversation was not seized ..... victim a was a minor page 12 of 15 on the date of alleged offence. as noted above, victim a came to delhi at the railway station on 13th april, 2012. case of the prosecution is that a was born on 13th may, 1994 as per the certificate exhibited by ..... to anand vishwa @ bishwa to enquire if any work was available for her. he told her to come to old delhi railway station as work was available. she came to delhi on 13th april 2012 around 7:00 a.m. and met anand vishwa @ bishwa at ..... old delhi railway station from where she was apprehended by cbi along with anand vishwa @ bishwa. she stated that in cbi office, anand vishwa @ .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... and in-laws. the conversation between the two accused in the immediate presence of the police officers is hit by section 26 of the indian evidence act and hence cannot be relied upon. further, the mobile phone page 3 of 15 which was used to record the conversation was not seized ..... victim a was a minor page 12 of 15 on the date of alleged offence. as noted above, victim a came to delhi at the railway station on 13th april, 2012. case of the prosecution is that a was born on 13th may, 1994 as per the certificate exhibited by ..... to anand vishwa @ bishwa to enquire if any work was available for her. he told her to come to old delhi railway station as work was available. she came to delhi on 13th april 2012 around 7:00 a.m. and met anand vishwa @ bishwa at ..... old delhi railway station from where she was apprehended by cbi along with anand vishwa @ bishwa. she stated that in cbi office, anand vishwa @ .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... passed away on 24-6-1970. there is no dispute that till the time of his passing away, the income tax returns he filed under the act and the old indian income tax act, 1922, were shown to be in his individual capacity. the returns for the accounting year in which his death occurred, however, showed that he ..... exclusion of all heirs) the general law of succession, i.e. the rules applicable to huf, would apply.28. calcutta discount co. ltd. v. income-tax officer, companies (1961) 041 itr0191is a decision for the proposition that it is for the assessing gtr21981 & connected matters page 30 of 32 officer (ao) to draw the correct conclusions, ..... ruler apparently was based on indivisibility of sovereignty (samprabhuta). that the revenue asserts such a rule, is anachronistic, to say the least. with the accession (to the indian republic) of the erstwhile state of jaipur, the ruler ceased to have any sovereign rights. coming into force of the constitution and article 18 (which abolishes titles) the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... was also filed, seeking enforcement of the arbitral award, however, the same was withdrawn. a petition for winding up was also filed under section 433 (e) of the companies act, 1956. the same is stated to be pending before this court. on behalf of the decree holder mr. arvind nayar, ld. senior 4. counsel, submits that under ..... award is a domestic award, even if the substantive law of the contract is foreign law.14. in the present case, the substantive law of the contract is indian law. the contract stipulates that the arbitral proceedings shall be held in new delhi, india. thus, the award under challenge in the present case is a domestic award ..... this part shall be ex.p. 271/2014 page 5 of 18 considered as a domestic award. as is set out hereinabove the said act applies to (a) arbitrations held in india between indians (b) international commercial arbitrations. as set out hereinabove international commercial arbitrations may take place in india or outside india. outside india an international .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... have filed an application under order vii rule 11 cpc for rejection of the plaint on the ground that the suit is barred under section 69 (2) of the indian partnership act, 1932 ( the act ).3. by the impugned order, the learned adj dismissed the application of the petitioners by relying upon a judgment of the kerala high court in afsal baker vs ..... no reason to differ from the conclusion arrived at by the court below to the effect that the suit is not barred under section 69(2) of is maintainable. the indian partnership act and the that it 8. in the instant case, the respondent is seeking enforcement of the liability of the petitioners created under section 30 and 37 of the negotiable ..... instrument. a reading of the crp no.19/2018 page 3 of 4 plaint leaves no room for doubt regarding that. the bar under section 69(2)of the indian partnership act would apply only where the suit is sought to be laid on a contract and not in a case where statutory right/liability is sought to be enforced. in the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... is to be read as providing for termination for convenience or without cause, the same would be vulnerable to being declared void under section 23, 28 and 73 of the indian contract act, 1872. the arbitrator, thereafter, held that clause 62 is intended to enable the respondent to declare the contract to be at an end when it is helpless in ..... on its assets or make or enter into any arrangements o.m.p. (comm) no.196/2018 page 18 or composition with creditors or suspend payments (or being a company should enter into liquidation either compulsory or voluntary), the suppliers/charterers shall be entitled to declare the contract as at an end without any liabilities on either side. 39. the ..... july 2010 (the o.m.p. (comm) no.196/2018 page 7 "con'), and to confirm that you would comply with your obligations under the coa by 5.00pm indian time on tuesday 11 december 2012. you have failed to respond, whether to us or to our clients. to recap, on 25 september 2012 you wrote to our clients, noble .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... general rule of trial being held in open court by permitting exclusion of public from proceedings . section 15 applies to offences by companies providing for vicarious criminal liability.19. section 13 of the official secrets act is at the core of the controversy that is raised by the petitioners. it reads thus:-" 13. restriction on trial of ..... prosecution pending in the court of sessions against the petitioners on the charge of offences under sections 3 and 5 of officials secret act, 1923 read with section 120 b of indian penal code, 1860 (ipc), crl.mc41202016 page 6 of 42 propriety of the procedure leading to cognizance being taken is questioned by the petition at hand. ..... with such offences. 16. it is trite that the code of criminal procedure, 1973 regulates the procedure for the investigation, inquiry or trial not only of the ipc offences but also of special law offences but, in the case of latter (the special law offences) application of cr.p.c. provisions is subject to specific .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... arbitration would not be exigible to stamp duty under ex.p. no.99/2015 pg. 11 of 28 the indian stamp act, 1899 (in short 'the stamp act'). it could not be the legislative intent, as captured under the 1996 act, to require stamping of a foreign award as it would then have to be assumed that it would be enforced ..... the awards rendered by it were not enforceable as per the provisions of section 48(2)(b) of the 1996 act. the conduct of the arbitral tribunal was thus not only contrary to the fundamental policy of the indian law but was also contrary to the established principles of justice. in this behalf, reliance was placed on the judgement ..... to challenge the decision by approaching the high court of singapore under section 10(3) of the ia act is untenable. 31.1 there is, contrary to the assertion made on behalf of ipl, no such fundamental policy in indian law that adjudicating authorities should mandatorily render decision on jurisdictional issues before hearing the matter on merits. the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... 5 cpc and order xxxix rule 1 and 2 cpc are to be kept in mind while passing orders under section 9 of the act. this has been clearly held by the apex court in the case of indian telephone industries vs. siemens public communication, reported as (2002) 5 scc510 25. this court in the case of modi rubber limited vs. guardian ..... delhi high court india ltd. v. amcipty ltd., o.m.p. 417/2011 decided on 1 september, 2011, the judgment of the division bench of this court in national shipping company was relied upon. the delhi high court observed that the provisions of order 38, rule 5 would serve as a guiding principle for the exercise of the jurisdiction while dealing ..... day, one allotment is made in favour of mr. amit katyal. in fact, mr. amit katyal is none other than the managing director and a major shareholder of the respondent company itself. the loan in favour of mr. katyal is also sanctioned on 29.03.2019 itself. the ledger entries in the account of mr. katyal with respect to the same .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... 5 cpc and order xxxix rule 1 and 2 cpc are to be kept in mind while passing orders under section 9 of the act. this has been clearly held by the apex court in the case of indian telephone industries vs. siemens public communication, reported as (2002) 5 scc510 25. this court in the case of modi rubber limited vs. guardian ..... delhi high court india ltd. v. amcipty ltd., o.m.p. 417/2011 decided on 1 september, 2011, the judgment of the division bench of this court in national shipping company was relied upon. the delhi high court observed that the provisions of order 38, rule 5 would serve as a guiding principle for the exercise of the jurisdiction while dealing ..... day, one allotment is made in favour of mr. amit katyal. in fact, mr. amit katyal is none other than the managing director and a major shareholder of the respondent company itself. the loan in favour of mr. katyal is also sanctioned on 29.03.2019 itself. the ledger entries in the account of mr. katyal with respect to the same .....
Tag this Judgment!