Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian railway companies act 1895 Court: delhi Page 100 of about 10,415 results (0.108 seconds)

Acqua Minerals Limited Vs. Mr. Pramod Borse and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR2001Delhi463; 93(2001)DLT203

..... the nsi which provides registration services of domain names under the internet network information center ('internic')'39. while refuting the defense that the provisions of indian trade mark act are not attracted to the use of domain name or domain name on the internet as the trade services do not find place in the ..... is entitled to equal protection as trade mark for it also identifies the internet site to those who reach it, much like a person's name identifies a specific company, the defendants have to be injuncted upon by way of permanent injunction.48. as a result, the suit is decreed and the defendants, their directors, servants, ..... potential... internet domain names are similar to telephone number mnemonics, but they are of greater importance, since there is no satisfactory internet equivalent to a telephone company while pages or directory assistance, and domain names may be a valuable corporate asset, as it facilities communication with a customer base. the uniqueness of internet .....

Hitachi Ltd. Vs. Ajay Kr. Agarwal and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 59(1995)DLT213; 1995(33)DRJ384

..... in the business of selling of transformers and refrigerators etc. that apart the appellant has entered into collaboration agreements with the following indian companies, which are using the trade mark 'hitachi' : company products trade mark best & elevator beacon-hitachi crompton circuit breaker cgl-hitachi contractor crompton hitachi deltron battery deltron-hitachi tata engineering excavtor ..... 'hitaishi' in hindi script. aggrieved by the order of the learned single judge, the appellant has filed the instant appeal under section 109(2) of the act. (11) we have heard the learned counsel on both sides and have also gone through the record. (12) learned counsel for the appellant submitted that ..... same till that application is decided and the proceedings in the suit be stayed. if the contention of the appellant is accepted section 28 of the act will become redundant and otiose. learned counsel for the respondent however, relied upon the decision of d.adinarayana setty v. brooke bond tea of india .....

Sh. Sanjeev Kumar JaIn Vs. Sh. Raghubir Saran Charitable Trust and ors ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 117(2005)DLT600; (2005)141PLR38

..... has encapsulated the facts in these words - 'by a lease of certain lands and premises dated sept. 28, 1907, and made between f.g. and the y. company, the y company were authorised to put up works and erections and to carry on the trade of mining. by a sub-lease dated aug. 8, 1908, the appellants became sub- ..... of over a century's vintage in sultan nawaz jung versus rustomji nanabhoy byramji jijibboy, 2nd 24 pc 156 where the provisions of the easement act came to be considered and interpreted as follows:the indian easements act, 1882, section 15, enacts that 'where the access and use of light or air to and for any building have been peaceably enjoyed ..... as is would have been anachronistic since the interconnecting stairway was constructed after the commencement of the tenancy) the plaintiff has relied on section 13 of the easement act. the plaintiff's contention is that a conjoint reading of the lease deed and these two letters gives a vested right to the plaintiff to use the front staircase .....

Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. and anr. Vs. Harinder Kohli and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 155(2008)DLT56; LC2009(1)274; 2008(38)PTC185(Del)

..... in various european languages such as german, dutch, spanish, french, etc. the defendant no. 3 - munish purii, is the chief operating officer of the defendant no. 4 company - mirchi movies limited, and is one of the co-producers of the film 'hari puttar - a comedy of terrors' with the defendants no. 1 and 2. the ..... defendants no. 3 and 4 modified the said title as 'hari puttar - a comedy of terrors'. the defendants' film title is registered in india with the 'indian motion picture producers' association (imppa)' and 'the film and television producers guild of india limited', and the defendants have also applied for registration with international bodies like ..... class 25, 917453 in class 28 and 1246560 in class 41, and that the defendants are guilty of infringing the aforesaid registered trademarks of the plaintiffs by the act of naming their film 'hari puttar', which is visually and phonetically similar to the plaintiffs' trademark 'harry potter'. 3. the plaintiffs further assert that 'harry .....

State Vs. R.P. Tyagi

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 153(2008)DLT693

..... direct evidence to prove who the offenders are.'this situation also drew the attention of the law commission which recommended, in its 113th report, an amendment to the indian evidence act - by introducing section 114-b in order to provide for an alleged offence of having caused bodily injuries to a person while in police custody, if there ..... to say that in his statement before the court of learned metropolitan magistrate, delhi, this witness had deposed to have produced mahender kumar and ram kumar in the company of jassu, kishan chand and rajender. since rajender and mahender are his real brothers, it cannot be presumed that he did not know his own brothers. pw 34 ..... in order to remove him from the scene, such proceedings were launched. unfortunately, ram kumar was found murdered and his dead body was found lying near a railway track in ghaziabad under mysterious circumstances on 19th november1990 during the pendency of the trial.ii) a perusal of the injuries on the body of the deceased as .....

Mrs. Madhu Garg and anr. Vs. North Delhi Power Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 124(2005)DLT688

..... were found by the court to be bona fide purchasers under a statutory sale. the interconnection between section 22 of the indian electricity act 1910 (electricity act for short) and section 26 of the electricity (supply) act 1948 (supply act for short) had been considered in detail. reference to the definitions of 'consumer' and 'occupier' were made, as also ..... within which to make the payment for charges. the tariff would justifiably increase if a condition is introduced for its collection by the utility authority or company or its agency since expenses for collection would have to be budgeted in. the tariff may also vary according to the amount of consumption allowed or ..... in disconnecting the electricity supply and thereafter should also file a suit for recovery of money/dues. this was despite having noticed that the defaulter and the company upon which the arrears had been transferred were within the same group. in cw 2340/2002 doodh nath v. dvb my learned brother sanjay kishan kaul, .....

Yacub Kispotta and Others Vs. Director General BSF and Others

Court : Delhi

..... cool and detached atmosphere of a court room, removed in time from the situation in question. where two views are possible, the court will decline to interfere." indian railway construction co v. ajay kumar, 2003 (4) scc 579 states held this: 12. what the high court was required to do was to see whether there ..... hyper sensitive and militancy prone. it is stated that the layout of the terrain with hilly features and thick forests around provided free movements to militants. the company was accommodated in the building of a primary school. the polling booths under police station ranka were quite far from each other and were located in remote ..... dismissing them from its services without holding any inquiry or giving them opportunity to explain their alleged misconduct in accordance with its parent law, the border security force act, 1968 ("the act") or the border security force rules, 1969 ( rules ?) framed there-under. 2. the facts necessary to decide this case are that all the petitioners .....

Master Nitish Arora Vs. State of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 141(2007)DLT21; 2007(94)DRJ407

..... also accepts the proposition that there would be no prohibition in treating an application under order 9 rule 13 cpc as an application under section 263 of the indian succession act.47. ms. kamlesh mahajan, learned counsel for the respondent has drawn my attention to the pronouncement reported at : air1971pat391 mst. tribeni kuer and nr. v ..... : 2001vad(delhi)140 ; delhi cloth and general mills co. limited v. dil bahadur 1981 (1) (del) 478 and chanceteam investments ltd. v. r.d. ramanath company : 110(2004)dlt708 ).45. i find that there is no dispute that this court has the jurisdiction to revoke a probate which may have been granted for valid reasons ..... has to be made within the statutory period of limitation under order 47 cpc while an application for revocation can be made only under section 263 of the indian succession act. learned counsel has relied on the pronouncement of this court reported in : air2004sc2093 shipping corporation of india ltd. v. machado brothers and ors. in support .....

Ex. Havildar K.P. Pandey Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2003(3)SLJ463(Delhi)

..... in support of their conclusion, even in cases in which they impose the death sentence. this must be remedied in order to ensure that a disciplined and dedicated indian army may not nurse a grievance that the substance of justice and fair play is denied to it.'35. the sentiment expressed above has been reiterated in union ..... subject to the provisions of this act, apply to all proceedings before a court-martial.'army rule 34.'34. warning of accused for trial.--(1 ..... which though not specified in this act, is prejudicial to good order and military discipline shall, on conviction by court-martial, be liable to suffer imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years of such less punishment as is in this act mentioned.'133. general rule as to evidence.--the indian evidence act, 1872 (1 of 1872), shall .....

Meera Dewan Vs. Shakuntala Dewan

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2002IIAD(Delhi)519; AIR2002Delhi321; 96(2002)DLT853

..... premises, being a 'settled property', estate duty having been paid on the death of one of the parties, the accountable person was entitled to exemption under section 29 of the act. section 29 requires that the deceased whose death attracts the duty must have had disposing power at the time of his death. thereforee, whether estate duty was payable to the ..... joint executants to the will, after the death of the survivor-executant 'k', the duty was not payable on the whole estate by virtue of section 29 of the estates act. it was further contended that the deceased 'k' was neither at the time of his death nor at any time during the continuance of the settlement, the full owner of .....