Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian railway board act 1905 section 4 repealed Court: jharkhand Page 4 of about 1,844 results (0.063 seconds)

Anil Kumar Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr

Court : Jharkhand

..... at bokaro. in view of the fact that the petitioner has brought on record the unimpeachable documents, supplied to him by the south eastern railway, under the right to information act, which has not been denied by the complainant, i find force in submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that allegations about the occurrence ..... of the namesake of the petitioner and complainant had traveled in the train, but it does not show that they were actually the complainant and the petitioner, who boarded the train. -5- learned counsel has accordingly, submitted that there is specific allegation in the complaint petition that on 28.12.2013, the complainant was at ..... kujur, learned judicial magistrate, 1 st class, bokaro, whereby prima facie offence under sections 498-a, 323, 504/34 of the indian penal code and section 4 of the dowry prohibition act has been found against the accused persons, including the petitioner. the petitioner is the husband of the complainant and he has also prayed for .....

Atibir Hi-tech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2007(1)BLJR840; [2007(1)JCR598(Jhr)]

..... respondents that any licence or sanction in fact had been granted to the petitioner in terms of the provisions contained in part ii of the indian electricity act.their lordships further observed:25. the definition of the word 'licensee' is absolutely clear and unambiguous. thus, in absence of any document to ..... the company was also purchasing electricity from dvc and from the bihar state electricity board. it was contended that the petitioner company is neither a licensee nor a sanction holder within the meaning of section 28 of the indian electricity act 1910. the petitioner is, therefore, liable to pay surcharge in terms of ..... consumption by that government;(b) consumed in the construction, maintenance, or operation of any railway company operating that railway, or sold to that government or any such 'railway company for consumption in the construction, maintenance or operation of any railway;(c) consumed by the licensee in the construction, maintenance and operation of his electrical .....

Ashok Kumar Singh and Anr Vs. Union of India Through the General Manag ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... down from the train, while the second being that it includes a situation where a person is trying to board the train and falls down while trying to do so. since the provision for compensation in the railways act is a beneficial piece of legislation, in our opinion, it should receive a liberal and wider interpretation and not ..... narrow meaning to the expression we will be depriving a large number of victims of train accidents ( particularly poor and middle class people) from getting compensation under the railways act. hence, in our opinion, the expression "accidental falling of a passenger from a train carrying passengers" includes accidents when bona fide passenger i.e. a passenger travelling ..... guard. even if there was any negligence on the part of the deceased, the negligence of that kind is not very uncommon on indian trains and the same can not be equated with the criminal act mentioned in clause (a) to (e) to the proviso to section 124-a. even it can not be brought within the clause .....

Sk. Khurshid Vs. the State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR641

..... further alleged that the informant came to know that two months ago the appellant had taken his wife fekiya khatoon for earning livelihood at panipat. they boarded the train at pirpanti railway station and when the train reached at bhagalpur, the appellant got down from the train deserting his wife in the train itself. it is stated ..... find that the conviction and sentenced passed against the appellant to be unsustainable. we find that the appellant has wrongly been convicted for the offence under section 364 ipc by the trial court. we therefore, hold that there was no clinching and reliable circumstantial evidence to connect the appellant with the offence alleged.26. accordingly, this ..... it appears that the essential ingredients for proving the said offence is firstly, that there should be kidnapping or abduction of a person and secondly that the act must be done that such person may be murdered or so disposed of as to be put in danger of being murdered.16. kidnapping is defined under .....

Qayum Mirza and Ors Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

..... paying it in his village home and therefore, if he wants to take money, he should accompany him to his village by a train and asked him to join at railway station where he along with his friend pappu @ amit kamal sahu came where they found akbar ansari, qayum mirza, md. siddique and israil present at the station. ..... of investigation, the police submitted charge sheet, upon which cognizance of the offences punishable under sections 302/34, 376(2)(g), 380 of the indian penal code and under section 27 of the arms act was taken against the appellants. subsequently, when the case was committed to the court of sessions, the appellants were put on trial. 5 during trial ..... when train came they boarded on the train for coming to the place known as maheshmunda. after reaching over there some of the accused persons took him as well as his friend pappu towards forest .....

Food Corpn. of India and Ors Vs. Deepak Kumar Singh

Court : Jharkhand

..... during the course of submission of learned counsel for the appellants and the plaintiff/respondent herein. one may usefully referred to the articles 18 and 55 of the indian limitation act, which read as under: description of suit period of limitation time from which period begins to run 18. for the price of three years when the work ..... in relation to the mishandling of transportation work in an un workman ship manner due to negligence which resulted in payment of demurrage and wharfage charges to the railways. no cross examination of the aforesaid witnesses were undertaken by the plaintiff. 14. learned trial court ultimately came to a conclusion that any such amount claimed by ..... of syndicate bank vs. channaveerappa beleri and others reported in (2006) 11 scc 506 and in the case of m/s. aries & aries vs. tamil nadu electricity board reported in 2017 scc online sc 537 in support of his contention. according to him, if the findings relating to limitation are decided in their favour, the entire .....

Govind Pandey Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... petitioner will take care of the petitioner if he is released on bail. the petitioner is in jail custody from 29.7.2014 though section 12 of the act clearly mandates that the grant of bail to a juvenile is a rule and rejection is exception. learned addl. p.p opposed the prayer. considering the submissions ..... addl.p.p. 01.07.2015 the sole petitioner has preferred this revision application under section 53 of the juvenile justice (care & protection of children ) act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act' ) against the order dated 21.4.2015 passed by the learned sessions judge, west singhnhum at chaibasa 28 of 2015 whereby and whereunder the prayer for ..... petitioner which was rejected by the principal magistrate, juvenile justice board, gumla, by order dated 30.1.2014 passed in ghaghra ps case no.30. of 2013 has been affirmed . the prosecution case as it appears from the record relates to the offences under section 302/34 ipc. learned counsel appearing for the petitioner relying upon the .....

Abhishek Kumar Pandey Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr

Court : Jharkhand

..... medical test conducted by the civil surgeon-cum-chief medical officer is not in accordance with the standard procedure which is used by the indian army. after appearing before the medical board, the petitioner went to sadar hospital at daltonganj and under the supervision of the medical superintendent, the wet test of the petitioner was ..... 5. the learned counsel appearing for these appellants submitted that their medical examination was done in haste; they had made representation to ntpc regarding constitution of medical board to re-examine their cases to which ntpc was not agreeing; they had got themselves medically examined from the same hospital and same doctor, namely ntpc, ..... is in process, he cannot supply the information until the 2 results are published. thereafter, the petitioner approached the 1st appellate authority under right to information act on 17.04.2017 after publication of result on 07.04.2017. the 1st appellate authority vide his letter dated 07.06.2017 replied that as the .....

Pintu Kumar and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... medical test conducted by the civil surgeon-cum-chief medical officer is not in accordance with the standard procedure which is used by the indian army. after appearing before the medical board, the petitioners went to sadar hospital at daltonganj and under the supervision of the medical superintendent, the wet test of the petitioners was ..... 5. the learned counsel appearing for these appellants submitted that their medical examination was done in haste; they had made representation to ntpc regarding constitution of medical board to re-examine their cases to which ntpc was not agreeing; they had got themselves medically examined from the same hospital and same doctor, namely ntpc, ..... is in process, they cannot supply the information until the results are published. thereafter, the petitioners approached the 1 st appellate authority under right to information act on 17.04.2017 after publication of result on 07.04.2017. the 1 st appellate authority vide his letter dated 07.06.2017 replied that as .....

Prakash Bhushan Vs. Finance

Court : Jharkhand

..... medical test conducted by the civil surgeon-cum-chief medical officer is not in accordance with the standard procedure which is used by the indian army. after appearing before the medical board, the petitioner went to sadar hospital at daltonganj and under the supervision of the medical superintendent, the wet test of the petitioner was ..... 5. the learned counsel appearing for these appellants submitted that their medical examination was done in haste; they had made representation to ntpc regarding constitution of medical board to re-examine their cases to which ntpc was not agreeing; they had got themselves medically examined from the same hospital and same doctor, namely ntpc, ..... the office to know the reasons for his elimination but the respondents did not disclose any reason to him. the petitioner sought information under right to information act but till now no information is given to him. hence, this writ petition has been filed.2.4. mr. anuj burman, learned counsel strenuously urges .....