Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian railway board act 1905 section 4 repealed Court: jharkhand Page 11 of about 1,844 results (0.121 seconds)

Virendra Kumar Jha and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

..... repeatedly requested to regularize the account but the same was not done and hence the case was instituted for the offence punishable under sections 406, 420/34 of the indian penal code, which was registered as sector iv p.s. case no. 159 of 2013. learned senior counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the entire allegations ..... tribunal. however, so far as the manner in which the petitioners had conspired and had diverted the funds for their own personal gain as well as by various acts, which have been enumerated in the written report itself, the bank is not precluded from seeking a remedy under criminal law. moreover, it appears that investigation into ..... before the debt recovery tribunal, ranchi being case no. o.a. no. 319 of2013 under section 19 of the recovery of debts due to bank and financial institution act, 1993 read with rule 4 of the debts recovery tribunal (procedure) rules, 1993 and notification issued by the ministry of finance banking division, and government of india and .....

Pankaj Kumar Prasad Vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr.

Court : Jharkhand

..... counsel for the petitioners has submitted that criminal proceeding against these petitioners cannot be continued and the same is fit to be quashed. apart from section 20 of the railway protection force act as has been indicated above the entire gamut of the offence alleged by the complainant/ o.p. no. 2 seems to be a fallout of the case ..... by the learned chief judicial magistrate, latehar on 07.11.2006 for the offence punishable under sections 147, 148, 500, 504, 506, 342, 392 and 395 of the indian penal code. it has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in fact the petitioner who was posted as inspector at r.p.f. post barwadih at ..... chief judicial magistrate, latehar, whereby and whereunder cognizance has been taken for the offence punishable under sections 147, 148, 500, 504, 506, 342, 392 and 395 of the indian penal code. the prosecution case in short is that a complaint case was instituted by the complainant o.p. no. 2 with allegation that on 16.10.2006, all the .....

Ram Ayodhya Yadav Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr

Court : Jharkhand

..... society ltd., tilaiya, bokaro and it was processed coal not directly mined out from the forest of the closed mines and as such no case under indian forest act or mines act is made out. it also appears that the confiscation proceeding was initiated in the year 2011 but till today it has not been concluded though the truck ..... of its production before court. during trial, if necessary, evidence could also be recorded describing the nature of property in detail.8. it is true that in indian forest act, after conclusion of confiscation proceeding, there is a provision for appeal and revision but the authority cannot be allowed to continue the proceeding for such a long ..... s.i., mandu police station, aforesaid case was instituted on 03.12.2011 under section 414/34 of the indian penal code and also under section 30(ii) of coal mines act and under section 33 of indian forest act with the allegation that on the basis of some confidential information, three trucks including the truck of the petitioner .....

Umesh Prasad Gupta Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

..... by the judicial magistrate, ranchi, whereby and whereunder, cognizance of the offenses punishable under sections 504 and 506 of indian penal code as well as under section 3(1))(x) of the scheduled caste and scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) act has been taken against the petitioner. before adverting to the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, the case ..... a case was registered as sc/st p.s. case no. 21/2010 under sections 504 and 506 of indian penal code as well as under section 3(1))(x) of the scheduled caste/scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) act against the petitioner and the matter was taken up for investigation. during investigation, the police did find all the ..... 2 to write a letter or to put his signature over a letter already written at the instance of the petitioner, there would not have been mentioning of the act justifying the action on the part of the opposite party no.2. in this regard, it be stated that in the said letter it has been stated that when .....

Ezaj Ahmad Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr

Court : Jharkhand

..... (bharno) p.s. case no. 139 of 2014 (g.r. no. 635 of 2014), which has been instituted for the offence punishable u/s 116/417/468/469 of the indian penal code (i.p.c.), pending before the learned sub divisional judicial magistrate, gumla.3. the f.i.r. was instituted on the basis of statement made by the officer ..... alleged that the informant subsequently came to know that the petitioner by taking her thumb impression, had instituted a false case against bipin mohan sinha and others under sc/st act and she could learn about the role of the petitioner in defrauding her. it has also been mentioned in the f.i.r. that the informant of sisai (bharno) p .....

Pramod Oraon Vs. The State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

..... not to be a juvenile by calculating his age on the date of occurrence strictly in terms of the report of the medical board without giving any relaxation as has been indicated above. such circumstances, therefore, cannot make the impugned order dated 14.10.2015 ..... of the appellant. what reassures us about the estimate of age is the fact that the same is determined by a medical board comprising professors of anatomy, radiodiagnosis and forensic medicine whose opinion must get the respect it deserves. that apart even if the age ..... thus a juvenile within the meaning of that expression as used in the act aforementioned. having said that we cannot help observing that we have not felt very comfortable with the medical board estimating the age of the appellant in a range of 30 to 36 ..... p.s. case no. 02 of 2015 was instituted for the offence punishable u/s 376 of the indian penal code. during the trial the petitioner had filed an application u/s 7 (a) of the juvenile justice (care and protection .....

Ms Singhbhum Mineral Company Represented Through One of Its Partner Sh ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... prepared the mining plan as per the provisions of mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to mmdr act, 1957 for the sake of brevity) and mineral (conservation & development) rules and the said mining was duly approved by indian bureau of mines (ibm) vide letter dated 13.05.1998. it has been averred that ..... to 21.10.2013. on 19.11.2013, the ministry of environment and forest, govt. of india also granted environment clearance. the jharkhand state pollution control board granted consent vide letter dated 13.12.2013 for establishment of the mining project and vide letter dated 28.12.2013 granted consent to operate for the said ..... government: provided that before granting approval for second or subsequent renewal of a mining lease, the state government shall seek a report from the controller general, indian bureau of mines, as to whether it would be in the interest of mineral development to grant the renewal of the mining lease: provided further that in .....

Ram Kumar Singh Choudhary and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2005(2)BLJR1054; [2005(2)JCR105(Jhr)]

..... down the provision for realization of fee and terms and conditions subject to which a license, permit or pass can be granted under this act. section 90 of the act empowers the board of revenue to make rules for prescribing the scale of fee or manner of fixing fee payable in respect of any exclusive privilege granted under section 22 or any license ..... for such period (if any) as may be prescribed by rule made by the state government under sections 89, clause (e).'under the said act rule 107 has been framed to prescribe fee for all sales of indian made foreign liquor under hotel, restaurant, bar, club and canteen licences payable in lump sum in advance according to the scale of fee fixed .....

Jai Mahavir Atta Mill Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Board and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR1763; 2009LC(JH)326

..... adverse conclusions drawn by the officials of the inspecting team of the respondent-board against the petitioner are totally erroneous and misconceived.referring to the amended provisions of the electricity act, 2003, learned counsel submits that the provisions of section 126 of the act deals with circumstances where consumer is accused of committing theft of electricity. ..... to disconnect the electric supply to the consumer. referring to the provisions of penalty for breaking the seal, learned counsel refers to rule 138 of the indian electricity rules, 1956 and submits that the rule provide that the person breaking the seal on the electric meter shall be punishable to fine, which may ..... of electricity in any manner against the petitioner, although the electric meters used to be inspected every month at the time when the concerned officers of the board to visit for recording the readings in the meters. as such, even if any alleged tampering of meter was detected on the date of inspection, the .....

Jharkhand (Bihar) State Electricity Board and ors. Vs. State of Jharkh ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2005(1)JCR241(Jhr)]

..... by the defendants in good faith believing that the plaintiff had been provided separate meters by the defendants as required under section 26 of the indian electricity act, 1910 but the fact is that meters installed by the plaintiff were not provided by the defendants as per the law nor they were ..... manager of plaintiff-company as well as principal officer also. the plaintiff had taken electrical connection for industrial and domestic purpose from bihar state electricity board and plaintiff transformer of 11,000 volt used to consume electricity according to its need. domestic consumption means electrical consumption in office, quarter, etc and ..... , learned counsel for the plaintiff-respondent submitted that in 1961 high tension electricity supply agreement was made between the plaintiff- respondent and bihar state electricity board (ext. -10). it has been stated in the plaint that for recording quantum of electrical energy consumption separate meters were installed for recording consumption .....