Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian railway board act 1905 section 4 repealed Court: jharkhand Page 1 of about 1,844 results (0.092 seconds)

Aug 20 2003 (HC)

Sai Electro Casting Private Ltd. Vs. Damodar Valley Corporation and or ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2003(3)JCR793(Jhr)]

..... . the said supply is clearly in violation of section 18 of the dvc act. 12. learned senior counsel for the appellant contended that such an illegal supply has been resorted to by the state electricity board for a number of years in respect of consumers even including the indian railways and in view, of this, it was not fail' or proper for ..... the dvc to come up with such a contention at this stage and to question the right of the board to supply energy to the appellant at a pressure of 30,000 volts or more. ..... the 'person' referred to in section 18(i) must be understood only as a licensee or a sanction holder recognized by the indian electricity act, 1910 and as not including the state electricity board created under the supply act. an attempt was also made by mr. ray at the appellate stage to challenge the constitutional validity of section 18 of the damodar .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 10 2015 (HC)

Mahendra Prasad and Anr Vs. Union of India Rep. by G.M. Ea

Court : Jharkhand

..... aggrieved/ victim person remains in addition to the amount of compensation paid as decided by railway claims tribunal. likewise, another communication was also given by the office of the legal adviser (railway board) vide its communication dated 10.4.2013.9. the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-indian railways submits that ex-gratia payment is required to be paid in consonance with the policy ..... decision, annexed with the counter-affidavit vide annexure-r/1 i.e. dated 26.7.2012 and accordingly, in case of train accident, as defined under section 124 of the act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 21 2016 (HC)

Prakash Tekriwal Vs. The Union of India Through the Ministry of Railwa ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... the proposals made in the budget speech by hon'ble minister of railways during the budget session in ensuing 2015 16 financial year. the entire exercise is being undertaken pursuant thereto under the direction of railway board and general manager, south eastern railway as would be evident from the enclosed annexures such as annexures r ..... case of any dispute the matter shall be settled through the process of arbitration. general manager/south eastern railway, or his nominee shall be the arbitrator and the provisions of indian arbitration and conciliation act 1996 shall be applicable. it also transpires from the pleadings on record as well as submissions of the ..... /4 and r/5 to the counter affidavit of respondent railway in the first writ petition. counsel for the respondent has taken a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 21 2016 (HC)

Prakash Tekriwal Vs. The Union of India Through the Minstry of Railway ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... the proposals made in the budget speech by hon'ble minister of railways during the budget session in ensuing 2015 16 financial year. the entire exercise is being undertaken pursuant thereto under the direction of railway board and general manager, south eastern railway as would be evident from the enclosed annexures such as annexures r ..... case of any dispute the matter shall be settled through the process of arbitration. general manager/south eastern railway, or his nominee shall be the arbitrator and the provisions of indian arbitration and conciliation act 1996 shall be applicable. it also transpires from the pleadings on record as well as submissions of the ..... /4 and r/5 to the counter affidavit of respondent railway in the first writ petition. counsel for the respondent has taken a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 15 2004 (HC)

Amar Nath Maheshwari @ Amar Nath Mahesh and Baldeo Prasad Vs. Union of ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2005(1)BLJR381; [2005(1)JCR6(Jhr)]

..... manger seems to have skirted, or avoided the issue with respect to the pin pointing of the blame, even in the light of the clear directions issued by the chairman, railway board to hold an impartial and independent inquiry and to fix the responsibility, if any. as far as we are concerned, we prima facie are of the opinion. that the ..... the then senior divisional commercial manager, adra (whose report was relied upon by mr. d. kullu in his aforesaid affidavit) might have done such act.which may amount to commit offence under section 193 of the indian penal code. before we proceed any further in the matter, in terms of section 195, read with section 340 of the code of criminal ..... of the view that the work order allotted to m/s. om prakash upadhaya needs no further interference by this court but at the same time we direct the railway authorities to act fairly and properly in the matter of allotment of tenders to the tenderers.10. in the result, we do not find any reason to proceed any further in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 24 2015 (HC)

Dew Concrete Ties Private Limi Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Bo

Court : Jharkhand

..... 11,12,600/- under section 126 (5) of the electricity act, 2003 2. sans unnecessary particular, the facts of the case is that petitioner took ht industrial connection from the jharkhand state electricity board ( herein after referred as the board ) for manufacturing of concrete sleepers for indian railway. it is stated that on 07.02.2006, a surprise ..... inspection conducted in the premises of the petitioner and two seals of l.v.-cum- c.t. box were found broken. thereafter, an fir lodged and the board provisionally assessed ..... to the effect that the petitioner has not committed theft of electricity. that apart, the purpose of a trial under sections 39/44 of the indian electricity act is entirely different and the object is to punish and sentence the person who is alleged to have committed the offence. the trial of an accused .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 23 2003 (HC)

Metallurgical Engineering Consultants (i) Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of B ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2004(1)JCR542(Jhr)]; (2004)ILLJ793Jhar

..... .r. khan's case was decided in respect of non statutory recognised canteen on the facts of that case, including the provision of the railway establishment code and circulars issued by the railway board from time to time and the other documents. their lordships clearly stated that in their lordship's opinion, the reasoning and conclusion in m. ..... a mere obligation to provide facilities to run a canteen, the canteen does not become part of the establishment. after referring to the other decisions, including the cases in indian overseas bank, air 2000 sc 1508, reserve bank of india, union of india v. j.b. subaiya air 1996 sc 2890, and m.m.r. khan held ..... by two learned judges, the principles emerging from the statute, law and judicial decisions are summarized as follows :(i) 'where, as under the provisions of the factories act, it is statutorily obligatory on the employer to provide and maintain canteen for the use of the employees, the canteen becomes a part of the establishment and, therefore, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 22 2016 (HC)

Hari Bansh Lal Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors.

Court : Jharkhand

..... notification. section 185(1) speaks as follows:- section 185. (repeal and saving):- save as otherwise provided in this act, the indian electricity act, 1910, the electricity (supply) act, 1948 and the electricity regulatory commissions act, 1998 are hereby repealed. the central electricity act of 2003 prohibits state electricity boards (sebs) from functioning as integrated power utilities. it makes it mandatory to divide them into separate entities for ..... country and consequently has generated new hopes for the electricity industry. before electricity act, 2003, the indian electricity sector was guided by the indian electricity act, 1910 and the electricity (supply) act, 1948 and the electricity regulatory commission act, 1998. the generation, distribution and transmission were carried out mainly by the state electricity boards in various states. due to politico-economic situation, the cross-subsidies reached at .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 06 2016 (HC)

Padam Kumar Jain Vs. The Union of India Through the Ministry of Mines ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... bureau of mines or various other authorities under the forest conservation act, environment protection act, 1986 or by state pollution control board.46. it is submitted that the provisions of such acts have to be made workable. at the same time, ..... the mines as per the mining plan. similarly, 30 various authorities under the environmental protection act, 1986, state pollution control board under the provisions of air and water (prevention and control of pollution) act are empowered not only to issue the statutory form and certificates of compliances of conditions by the ..... lessee, but also to take decision in respect of any violations thereof.45. the impugned order however does not contain any findings as to any such action taken by either indian .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 06 2016 (HC)

Ms Shah Brothers Through One of Its Partner Sri Raj Kumar Shah Vs. The ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... bureau of mines or various other authorities under the forest conservation act, environment protection act, 1986 or by state pollution control board.46. it is submitted that the provisions of such acts have to be made workable. at the same time, ..... the mines as per the mining plan. similarly, 30 various authorities under the environmental protection act, 1986, state pollution control board under the provisions of air and water (prevention and control of pollution) act are empowered not only to issue the statutory form and certificates of compliances of conditions by the ..... lessee, but also to take decision in respect of any violations thereof.45. the impugned order however does not contain any findings as to any such action taken by either indian .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //