Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian railway board act 1905 section 4 repealed Court: jharkhand Page 3 of about 1,844 results (0.112 seconds)

Subrato Ghosh. Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr.

Court : Jharkhand Ranchi

..... , argument advanced on behalf of the parties, i find that the prosecutrix informant, who was head t.t.e. in the indian railway had sufficient intelligence to understand the significance and moral quality of the act she was consenting to the petitioner, who was much younger to her, to establish bodily relationship on the inducement and promise of ..... and therefore charge was rightly proposed under section 3(i) (xii) of the s.c. & s.t. (prevention of atrocities) act against the petitioner besides other offence under sections 376/417 of the indian penal code. the informant was completely misled by the petitioner who on the promise of marriage exploited her sexually and thereafter declined to ..... 2009 was rejected and a prima facie case was found against the petitioner under sections 376/417 of the indian penal code as also under section 3(i) (xii) of the s.c. & s.t. (prevention of atrocities) act. the petitioner was called upon to stand charged by the said order.2. the prosecution story in short .....

Ajay Tirkey. Vs. the State of Jharkhand.

Court : Jharkhand Ranchi

..... magistrate, hatia giving rise to complaint case no.c-4/57/08 on 04.08.2008 for the alleged offence under sections 145,146 and 147 of the railway act, 1989 subsequent case registered vide jagarnathpur p.s. case no.125 of 2008 on the statement of the same informant/complainant is barred under section 162 code of criminal ..... taking cognizance of the offence committed under the general law on the statements of the informant which disclosed the cognizable offence giving rise to jagarnathpur police case registered under the indian penal code which was forwarded to the c.j.m. and to my view it cannot be held as the statement of the informant under section 162 cr.p ..... cognizance of the offence committed under the general law on the statements of the informant which disclosed the cognizable offence giving rise to jagarnathpur police case registered under the indian penal code which was forwarded to the c.j.m. and to my view it cannot be held as the statement of the informant under section 162 cr.p .....

State Through Superintendent of Police Cbi Vs. Mahendra Prasad and anr ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2006(1)JCR191(Jhr)]

..... in the office of carriage and wagon department of eastern railway, barwadih o.p. no. 1 demanded illegal gratification of rs. 200/- from the complainant s.h. verma for issuing release order. accordingly a trap was laid and o.ps. nos ..... of this application are that pursuant to the complaint received by the c.b.i., dhanbad by one s.h. verma, fitter grade-i of carriage and wagon department, eastern railway, barwadih, cbi authorities registered fir bearing rc case no. 25(a)/94/(d) on 3,9.1994 against the o.p. no. 1 and 2 that while complainant was working ..... complainant. cbi, dhanbad conducted an investigation into the case and filed charge sheet on 31.10.1994 under section 120b, ipc read with section 7 and section 13(2) read with section 13(1)(d) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 in the court of special judge-cbi cases-cum-1st additional session judge, dharbad along with the list of nine .....

Tata Yadogawa Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2003(51)BLJR780; [2003(1)JCR497(Jhr)]

..... 361 bags 26 bags were found and delivered entirely empty. consequently, short certificate was issued. the plaintiff, thereafter, served notice under section 78b of the indian railways act and also under section 80, cpc and then instituted the suit.3. the defendant-respondent appeared and filed written statement taking various defences including that the ..... is the suit barred by limitation?(iv) whether the notices under section 78b of the indian railways act and under section 80, cpc were served upon the defendants or its authority?(v) whether the consignment was booked at railway risk and if whether the plaintiff is entitled to realise the amount as claimed for?(vi) ..... not correctly appreciated the law while deciding the issue of limitation. admittedly before instituting the suit the plaintiff served notices under section 78(b) of the railways act and section 80, cpc. the period of two months, therefore, ought to have been taken into consideration by the court below while deciding the issue .....

Md. Najrul Hassan Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2008(57)BLJR34; [2008(4)JCR406(Jhr)]

..... forest and wild life of the country17. on march 3, 1974 on receiving the assent from the president of the indian republic, the water (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1974 came into effect. the pollution is considered to be such contamination, alteration of property, could be physical, chemical ..... quality management, water pollution monitoring and management, international institute of hydraulic and environmental engineering, netherland and air pollution control technique at central pollution control board, delhi. petitioner has also mentioned list of papers published/paper presented in seminars/symposiums/colloquiums etc. petitioner also stated about his posting in different ..... the part of the appointing authority.25. in the instant case, as noticed above, petitioner was temporarily appointed as member secretary of the board vide notification dated 19.5.2006 till appointment of regular member secretary. violating the mandate of the supreme court, the state government replaced the .....

Budhwa Oraon and ors. Vs. the State of Jharkhand and Nutan Ekka

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2008(4)JCR202(Jhr)]

..... learned sdjm, ranchi on erroneous consideration of the fact and without application of judicial mind found prima facie offence under sections 354 of the indian penal code also against the other petitioners without any overt act who are ladies, and the petitioner no. 7 rajesh dungdung, which is illegal and it amounts to miscarriage of justice. therefore, ..... , ranchi in complaint case no. 574 of 2005 wherein having been satisfied with the prima facie offence under sections 498a/354/323 read with 34 of the indian penal code, processes were directed to be issued against the petitioners-accused.2. the short fact of the case as narrated in the complaint petition by the ..... if at all any offence is made out prima facie under sections 354/511 of the indian penal code, it is only against the petitioners budhwa .....

Sukhlal Deogam @ Lal Singh Deogam and anr. Vs. State of Bihar (Now Jha ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2004(3)BLJR1730; [2004(4)JCR59(Jhr)]

..... oral dying declaration of the deceased as spelt by pws 1-4 holding the appellants guilty of the charges under section 302/34, ipc. in this case except pws 1-4 none was the witness of the death of the deceased borta deogam. pw 5 is ..... of the said injuries on the neck, so called dying declaration inspires no confidence and the same can not be safely relied and acted upon as the sole basis for convicting the appellants. in view of the medical evidence, the said dying declaration suffers from grave exception ..... a conviction can rest on a dying declaration, it is implied that it must inspire confidence so as to make it safe to act upon it. hence, when from the medical evidence on record it was found that the vital organs of the deceased was completely ..... were convicted by the learned 2nd additional sessions judge, singhbhum at cahibasa in st no. 262/1987 under section 302/34, ipc for the murder of borta deogam and were sentenced to undergo ri for life. aggrieved by the same, this appeal has been .....

Sujit Kumar Roy Vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2004(2)BLJR1118; 2004CriLJ3693; II(2004)DMC477

..... the revisionist for the offence under sections 468, 471, 467, 476, 420 and 120b, ipc and sentenced him to undergo r.i. for three years on each count, besides the revisionist was also convicted under section 4 of the dowry prohibition act and sentenced to undergo r.i. for one year. against those convictions and sentence, ..... the revisionist had preferred an appeal. the appellate court acquitted him of the charge under sections 467 and 476, ipc and with that modification, confirmed the conviction under other sections ..... had already set aside the conviction under other sections and has rightly done so and the findings on law against the sections 468, 471, 420 and 120b, ipc are not unlawful. consequently, i do not find any merit in this revision.6. the total circumstances reveal that the revisionist played a pivotal role withthe accused .....

Kishan Mandal and Anr Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

..... deoghar fair. this all happened on 22.07.2001. subsequently, bhudeo was found dead on 27.07.2001 at gorakhpur railway station. information was given to the informant and other witnesses who went there and then brought dead body. since, the appellants ..... the prosecution has been able to prove all the ingredients required to have for attracting the offence under section 364a of the indian penal code, which reads as follows: section 364a: kidnapping for ransom, etc. : whoever kidnaps or abducts any person or ..... those in which conviction of the appellant was upheld and the records were directed to be placed before the juvenile justice board for awarding suitable punishment to the appellant.9. under the circumstances, we intend to examine the case on its merit ..... or 159[any foreign state or international inter-governmental organisation or any other person] to do or abstain from doing any act or to pay a ransom, shall be punishable with death, or imprisonment for life, and shall also be liable to .....

Sukhlal Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

..... on the basis of the fardbeyan, barkakana rail p.s. case no.19 of 2004 dated 07.05.2004 under sections 396, 397 of the indian penal code and section 27 of arms act was registered against 20-25 unknown accused persons and investigation was taken up. during investigation the appellant was arrested wherein he has confessed his guilt and ..... recorded on 07.05.2004 at 18:45 hours at daltonganj railway station platform no.1, is that on 06.05.2004 at about 03:00 o'clock the informant along with his friends brajesh kumar sharma, c squadron 3 troop along with l.d. h.s.dubey boarded the general compartment of tata-hatia-pathankot express train bearing train ..... no.8101 up bearing compartment no.958408/a (general) at ranchi to visit their respective homes in vacation. at about 10:00 p.m. when the said train was leaving tori railway station, some passengers of the said general compartment .....