Indian Partnership Act - Judgment Search Results
Kagaz Packaging a Partnership Firm Registered Under the Indian Partner ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-24-2006
Reported in: 2006(5)BomCR295
Matched in: Parties Kagaz Packaging a Partnership Firm Registered Under the Indian Partnership Act and Ms. Rajul Manoj Shah Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Service Through the Ministry of Law, Justice and Company Affairs,
Sheelvik Agencies a Registered Partnership Firm Under the Indian Partn ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-12-2009
Reported in: 2009(3)BomCR266
Matched in: Parties Sheelvik Agencies a Registered Partnership Firm Under the Indian Partnership Act Vs. the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (Mhada) Being the Authority Under the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976
D. Gowadia and Co. a Partnership Firm Registered Under the Indian Part ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-06-2009
Reported in: 2009(3)BomCR127
Matched in: Parties D. Gowadia and Co. a Partnership Firm Registered Under the Indian Partnership Act Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the Chief Engineer
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Chaudhary Construction Co. a Partnership Firm Duly Registered Under th ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-19-2009
Reported in: 2009(4)BomCR344; 2009(111)BomLR1665
Matched in: Parties Chaudhary Construction Co. a Partnership Firm Duly Registered Under the Indian Partnership Act Vs. Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation and Deputy Chief Engineer (Swd) Ws
Shantez a Partnership Firm Registered Under the Indian Partnership Act ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-17-2009
Reported in: 2009(4)BomCR799; 2009(111)BomLR1338; 2009(4)MhLj37
basis. It will be useful to make a reference to the case of Raj Kumar Chawla v. Lucas Indian Services : AIR2006Delhi266 where the Court discussed the intent and scope of the term 'admission' as contemplated under … It would then not be a case of bailment within the meaning of Section 148 of the Contract Act. The transaction in question was neither a bailment nor a pledge. It was a composite transaction. It was
Shri Krishna Homeo Pharmacy a Partnership Firm, Registered Under the I ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-28-2005
Reported in: 2006(1)ALLMR129; 2006(1)BomCR229; 2006(1)MhLj325
ex officio; (iv) the Director of the Central Research Institute, Kasauli, ex officio; (v) the Director of the Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, ex officio: (vi) the President of the Medical Council of India, ex officio; (vii) … D.Y. Chandrachud, J1. The Petitioner is a partnership firm registered under the Partnership Act, 1932, and carries on the business of manufacturing and selling homoeopathic medicines at a factory situated at Chinchwad.
The Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay, a Body Corporate Constitu ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-26-2007
Reported in: 2008(1)ALLMR517; 2008(1)ARBLR155(Bom); 2008(1)BomCR366
Matched in: Parties The Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay, a Body Corporate Constituted Under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 Vs. Mohinder Singh and Company, a Partnership Firm, Duly Registered Under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932
Dimexon, a Firm Registered Under the Provisions of the Indian Partners ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-12-2009
Reported in: 2009(241)ELT519(Bom)
Ferdino I. Rebello, J.1. The petitioner is a partnership firm whose partners are national and citizen of India. The petitioner are manufacturers of Gems and Jewellery. It … India. The petitioner are manufacturers of Gems and Jewellery. It is the case of the petitioners that the action of the respondents in denying to them the benefits of exemption Notification No. 159/86 dated 1st March, 1986
Avdel Tools and Services, a Partnership Firm Registered Under the Indi ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-16-2008
Reported in: 2008(6)ALLMR611; 2009(1)BomCR746; (2008)110BOMLR3496
the Companies Act, 1956 as Vendor and M/s. Avdel Tools & Services, a Partnership Firm, registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 as Purchaser, in relation to the Plot No. A-285, Thane Industrial Area, admeasuring 1265 sq. metres at
Manratna Developers, a Partnership Firm Registered Under the Provision ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-23-2008
Reported in: 2008(6)ALLMR550; (2008)110BOMLR3571; 2009(2)MhLj115
Matched in: Parties Manratna Developers, a Partnership Firm Registered Under the Provisions of Indian Partnership Act Vs. Megh Ratan Cooperative Housing Society Limited a Cooperative Housing Society Registered Under the Provisions of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960,
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free