Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-09-2014
..... that the petitioners were also claiming that pending decision of the state government on applications for second and subsequent renewals under section 8(3) of the mmdr act filed prior to the amendment with effect from 18th july, 2014 of rule 24a(6), the said mining leaseholders should be allowed to operate their respective mining leases. however upon our ..... of this sub-rule shall not apply to renewal under sub-section (3) of section 8 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (67 of 1957). (vi) that the petitioner federation of indian mineral industries (fimi) in w.p.(c) no.7745/2014 was formed as an all india body to promote the interest of mining, ..... *in the high court of delhi at new delhi date of decision:9. h december, 2014 % + w.p.(c) no.7745/2014 federation of indian mineral industries (fimi) .... petitioner through: dr. abhishek manu singhvi, sr. adv. with mr. anand varma & mr. tarun patnaik, advs. versus union of india & ors. ..... respondents through: mr. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Oct-30-2014
..... recovery of fine and in that sense a fine stands on a higher footing than the compensation awarded by the court. although, after the amendment in the said act (by the amendment act, 2002) a magistrate of the first class can also impose a sentence of fine exceeding rs.5000/-. 23 in the case i.e. ..... revision petitions shall be decided. parties are common; haryana petrochemical ltd. and its managing director rajiv aggarwal are revisionists before this court; the respondent/complainant is indian petrochemicals ltd. a. criminal revision petition no.546/2011 has impugned the judgment and order of sentence dated 17.9.2011 and 27.9.2011 respectively ..... nos.18477/2012 & 1064042/2014 haryana petrochemicals ltd. through ..... petitioner mr. r.n. mittal, sr. adv. along with mr. tanvir ahmed mir and mr. dhruv gupta, advs versus indian petrochemicalsltd & anr. through ..... respondents mr. aman lekhi, sr. advocate with mr. manoj arora and mr. siddharth shankar, advs. for r-1. mr. ravi nayak, app for the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Mar-12-2014
..... this chapter were made inapplicable in case of search initiated under section 132 or section 132a after 31.05.2003 by introduction of an amendment to the chapter as section 158bi vide the finance act, 2003 with effect from 01.06.2003. the lis before us requires examination of the provisions of the said chapter, particularly section ..... effectuate the object and purpose of the statute and not defeat the same (whitney v. commissioners of inland revenue 1926 a c37, cit v. mahaliram ramjidas (1940) 8 itr442 indian united mills ltd. v. commissioner of excess profits tax, bombay [1955]. 27 itr20sc), and gursahai saigal v. cit, punjab [1963]. 1 itr48sc); commissioner of wealth tax, ..... object and purpose of the statute and not defeat the same. (whitney v. commissioners of inland revenue 1926 a c37 cit v. mahaliram ramjidas (1940) 8 itr442#160;, indian united mills ltd. v. commissioner of excess profits tax, bombay, [1955]. 27 itr20sc) and gursahai saigal v. cit, punjab, [1963]. 1 itr48sc). 37. it is .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Sep-17-2014
..... 656/210 taxman 72/19 taxmann.com 183 (bom.) our court has observed as under:- " . . . while a subsequent decision of a court or a legislative amendment enforced after the order of assessment may legitimately give rise to an inference of an escapement of income, before the assessing officer proceeds to reopen an assessment after the ..... petitions under article 226 of the constitution of india, challenge: (a) two separate notices dated 25th january, 2006 issued under section 148 of the income tax act, 1961 (the act), seeking to re-open the assessment for the assessment years 1998-99 and 1999-2000; and (b) two separate re-assessment orders passed on 7th march ..... assessment. thus, the notices are without jurisdiction; (b) the entire issue with regard to the petitioner's claim for deduction under section 80hhc of the act was subject of examination during scrutiny proceeding leading to the assessment orders dated 28th february, 2001 and 13th february 2002 for assessment years 1998-99 and 1999- .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-01-2014
..... such law. (4) sections 25 and 26 and the definition of easement in section 2 shall not apply to cases arising in the territories to which the indian easements act, may for the time being extend.16. a perusal of section 29 (2) makes it clear that if any special or local law prescribes a period of ..... carriage by air signed at warsaw on the 12th day of october, 1929. section 2(1) defines amended convention as the convention as amended by the hague protocol on the 28 th day of september, 1995. 10. section 3(1) of the act reads as under: 3. application of convention to india (1) the rules contained in the first ..... irrespective of the nationality of the aircraft performing the carriage. 11. similarly, section 4(1) of the act reads as under: 4. application of amended convention to india (1) the rules contained in the second schedule, being the provisions of the amended convention relating to the rights and liabilities of carriers, passengers, consignors, consignees and other persons shall, subject .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-01-2014
..... such law. (4) sections 25 and 26 and the definition of easement in section 2 shall not apply to cases arising in the territories to which the indian easements act, may for the time being extend.16. a perusal of section 29 (2) makes it clear that if any special or local law prescribes a period of ..... carriage by air signed at warsaw on the 12th day of october, 1929. section 2(1) defines amended convention as the convention as amended by the hague protocol on the 28 th day of september, 1995. 10. section 3(1) of the act reads as under: 3. application of convention to india (1) the rules contained in the first ..... irrespective of the nationality of the aircraft performing the carriage. 11. similarly, section 4(1) of the act reads as under: 4. application of amended convention to india (1) the rules contained in the second schedule, being the provisions of the amended convention relating to the rights and liabilities of carriers, passengers, consignors, consignees and other persons shall, subject .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-01-2014
..... such law. (4) sections 25 and 26 and the definition of easement in section 2 shall not apply to cases arising in the territories to which the indian easements act, may for the time being extend.16. a perusal of section 29 (2) makes it clear that if any special or local law prescribes a period of ..... carriage by air signed at warsaw on the 12th day of october, 1929. section 2(1) defines amended convention as the convention as amended by the hague protocol on the 28 th day of september, 1995. 10. section 3(1) of the act reads as under: 3. application of convention to india (1) the rules contained in the first ..... irrespective of the nationality of the aircraft performing the carriage. 11. similarly, section 4(1) of the act reads as under: 4. application of amended convention to india (1) the rules contained in the second schedule, being the provisions of the amended convention relating to the rights and liabilities of carriers, passengers, consignors, consignees and other persons shall, subject .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Dec-08-2014
..... found untenable, and, in its judgment, this court so pronounced. the apex court after analysing the provisions of the 2006 amendment act came to the definite conclusion that the 2006 amendment act plainly override the decision of the judgment of the supreme high court in mullaperiyar environmental protection forum's case (supra). the ..... 2011 -:82. :- 36. after setting out the principles of separation of power, the apex court proceeded to examine the constitutional validity of the 2006 amendment act. the apex court also referred to its decision in mullaperiyar environmental protection forum's case and laid down the following in paragraphs 125 and 126 which are ..... conservation (amendment) act, 2006. the state of tamil nadu thereafter instituted a suit under article 131 of the constitution before the supreme court against the state of kerala. in the above context the apex court considered the doctrine of separation of power. in paragraph 93 the following was laid down:"3. indian constitution, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : May-06-2014
..... to be the mother tongue.25. after the recommendations of the state reorganization commission, 1955, article 350a was inserted in the constitution by the constitution (viith amendment) act. article 350a reads: it shall be the endeavour of every state and of every local authority within the state to provide adequate facilities for instruction in the ..... involve risks of abuse. but the framers of the constitution may well have reflected with madison who was the leading spirit in the preparation of the first amendment of the federal constitution , that it is better leave a few of its noxious branches to their luxuriant growth than, by pruning them away, to injure ..... cited state of bombay v. bombay education society & ors. [air1954sc561 wherein a constitution bench of this court has held that a minority group such as the anglo-indian community, which is based, inter alia, on religion and language, has the fundamental right to conserve its language, script and culture under article 29(1) and has .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on : Apr-02-2014
..... obviate any confusion “ the expression large scale is not a very precise expression “ parliament stepped in and added the explanation to section 2(1)(d) by ordinance / amendment act, 1993. the explanation excludes certain purposes from the purview of the expression commercial purpose “ a case of exception to an exception. let us elaborate : a person who ..... agricultural land on rent from chawla krishi farm, mandir hasaud (riko road) and is carrying agriculture activities. o.p.no.1 is a company registered under indian companies act, 1956 and it is manufacturer of white potash fertilizer, o.p.no.2 is regional office of o.p.no.1 in chhattisgarh state and o.p. ..... not maintainable and the relief sought by the complainant is of civil nature and can be adjudicated only by way of civil suit. under the provisions of indian companies act, 1956 a complaint can be instituted only through a company secretary, therefore mis-joinder of the parties is present in the complaint. the complainant is carrying .....
Tag this Judgment!