Court : Competition Commission of India CCI
Decided on : Apr-03-2014
..... to 90 days before and after the fair in case of itpo fairs and third party fairs having similar product profiles. 7. highlighting the above amendments as arbitrary and discriminatory, the informant alleged that op 2 adversely affected the established exhibitions of other players in the market by scheduling its own unrecognized ..... fairs in a manner which promotes the business interests. accordingly, op 2 intimated op 1 vide its letter dated 28.03.2003 that the guidelines have been amended to drop the œtime gap restrictionÿ between two exhibitions/ fairs irrespective of where the exhibitions/ fairs are held. 5. however, in 2006, op 2 ..... section 19(1)(a) of the competition act, 2002 (œthe actÿ) was filed by indian exhibition industry association (œthe informantÿ) against ministry of commerce and industry (œop 1ÿ) and indian trade promotion organization (œop 2ÿ/ itpo) alleging inter alia contravention of the provisions of section 4 of the act. the commission after considering the entire material .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Competition Commission of India CCI
Decided on : Apr-15-2014
..... of power (mop) to resolve various issues in relation to the fsas for new power plants, consequent to which cil amended various clauses of these fsas. (e) crisil engaged in detailed discussions with various stakeholders and produced at least five versions of ..... fair and according to the object for which the informant was acquiring coal. 5. the informant also stated that the boilers of the power plant at sanjay gandhi thermal power station (sgtps) were designed for calorific value of around 3700 ..... in the definition of relevant market. 60. elaborating the factors, it was argued that the plant design/ specifications of most indian thermal power plants, which are designed for burning domestic coal on account of factors intrinsic in the coal like ash content ..... 3. the information in case no. 05 of 2013 has been filed under section 19(1)(a) of the competition act, 2002 (the act) by m/s madhya pradesh power generating company limited against m/s south eastern coalfields ltd. (the opposite party no. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Competition Commission of India CCI
Decided on : Mar-11-2014
..... dealers of drugs, medicines and of allied products and of manufacturer of medicines, drugs, pharmaceuticals etc. and possessing a drug license under the drug and cosmetics (amendment) act and of the accredited agents and representatives of such licenses of other states having their office in this state (i.e. west bengal) can become an ordinary ..... terms of the various mous signed between all india organization of chemists and druggists (aiocd) and the organization of pharmaceuticals producers of india (oppi) and the indian drugs manufacturers association (idma). the above fixed margins are possible only if drugs are sold at their respective mrps and the sellers do not indulge in undercut ..... drugs and controlling the supply of drugs in a concerted manner in violation of section 3(3)(a) and 3(3)(b) of the competition act, 2002 (the act). 3. based on the information received from shri singh and other relevant information available in the public domain, the commission decided to undertake a suo .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Competition Commission of India CCI
Decided on : Jan-16-2014
..... 4. in the present information, the informant in the very beginning has stated that it was promoter of indian cricket league and seeks to provide information to the commission regarding contravention of section 4 of the act by bcci by bringing to the notice of the commission the facts of anti competitive and abusive practices being ..... and govt. of india seeking a restraint on action by the employers against players for being associated with icl. when op amended its rules and regulations during pendency of the suit, the informant accordingly amended its suits to get such rules and regulations declared illegal and void. it is also informed that op filed a suit ..... of internet domain names filed by the informant was decreed in its favour. the informant, apart from details of litigation, has highlighted the hostility of bcci towards indian cricket league. it also gave facts about ipl and mr. lalit modi, the erstwhile commissioner of ipl. 6. the informant specifically stated that the relevant market .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Competition Commission of India CCI
Decided on : Jan-09-2014
..... four steel companies, against the market research study report commissioned by the commission in january 2009 on public enterprise and government policy impact on competition- indian steel industries which clearly states as follows: there is no doubt that the concentration level in certain products market such as hr coils is significant with ..... general (investigation and registration) of the mrtp commission (dg iandr) in view of the provisions contained under section 66(6) of the competition act, 2002 (the act). facts 2. the mrtp commission took cognizance of the matter on the basis of an article published in the financial express on 11.03.2008 ..... of repealed mrtp, act. this premise becomes clear when the provisions of section 66(6) are contrasted with the provisions of section 66(3) of the act. whereas the competition appellate tribunal has been specifically conferred power to adjudicate cases pertaining to monopolistic and restrictive trade practices pending before mrtp commission in .....
Tag this Judgment!