Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian boilers amendment act 2007 section 3 amendment of section 2 Court: chhattisgarh state consumer disputes redressal commission scdrc raipur Year: 2014 Page 1 of about 5 results (0.265 seconds)

Apr 02 2014 (TRI)

Shamsher Singh Vs. Indian Potash Limited Company (i.P.L. Company) Thro ...

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

Decided on : Apr-02-2014

..... obviate any confusion “ the expression large scale is not a very precise expression “ parliament stepped in and added the explanation to section 2(1)(d) by ordinance / amendment act, 1993. the explanation excludes certain purposes from the purview of the expression commercial purpose “ a case of exception to an exception. let us elaborate : a person who ..... agricultural land on rent from chawla krishi farm, mandir hasaud (riko road) and is carrying agriculture activities. o.p.no.1 is a company registered under indian companies act, 1956 and it is manufacturer of white potash fertilizer, o.p.no.2 is regional office of o.p.no.1 in chhattisgarh state and o.p. ..... not maintainable and the relief sought by the complainant is of civil nature and can be adjudicated only by way of civil suit. under the provisions of indian companies act, 1956 a complaint can be instituted only through a company secretary, therefore mis-joinder of the parties is present in the complaint. the complainant is carrying .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 12 2014 (TRI)

Vincent Anty Vs. M/S. M.B. Kirloskar Oil Engine Limited, Through: Mana ...

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

Decided on : Mar-12-2014

..... confusion “ the expression large scale is not a very precise expression “ parliament stepped in and added the explanation to section 2(1)(d) by ordinance / amendment act, 1993. the explanation excludes certain purposes from the purview of the expression commercial purpose “ a case of exception to an exception. let us elaborate : a ..... confusion “ the expression large scale is not a very precise expression “ parliament stepped in and added the explanation to section 2(1)(d) by ordinance / amendment act, 1993. the explanation excludes certain purposes from the purview of the expression commercial purpose “ a case of exception to an exception. let us elaborate : a ..... ltd. v. development credit bank ltd., (supra), honble supreme court observed thus :- œ7. in the indian medical association case (supra) this court noticed the powers conferred on the several for a under the act. the procedure applicable (including the exercise of some powers of the civil court under the code of civil procedure .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 12 2014 (TRI)

Vandana Global Limited Vs. M/S. Jaypee Engg. and Hydraulics Equipment ...

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

Decided on : Mar-12-2014

..... confusion “ the expression large scale is not a very precise expression “ parliament stepped in and added the explanation to section 2(1)(d) by ordinance / amendment act, 1993. the explanation excludes certain purposes from the purview of the expression commercial purpose “ a case of exception to an exception. let us elaborate : a ..... confusion “ the expression large scale is not a very precise expression “ parliament stepped in and added the explanation to section 2(1)(d) by ordinance / amendment act, 1993. the explanation excludes certain purposes from the purview of the expression commercial purpose “ a case of exception to an exception. let us elaborate : a ..... development credit bank ltd., air 2004 supreme court 184, honble supreme court observed thus :- œ7. in the indian medical association case (supra) this court noticed the powers conferred on the several for a under the act. the procedure applicable (including the exercise of some powers of the civil court under the code of civil .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 28 2014 (TRI)

Srei. Equipment Finance Private Limited, Through : Manager Vs. Ibrahim ...

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

Decided on : Apr-28-2014

..... obviate any confusion “ the expression large scale is not a very precise expression “ parliament stepped in and added the explanation to section 2(1)(d) by ordinance / amendment act, 1993. the explanation excludes certain purposes from the purview of the expression commercial purpose “ a case of exception to an exception. let us elaborate : a person ..... obviate any confusion “ the expression large scale is not a very precise expression “ parliament stepped in and added the explanation to section 2(1)(d) by ordinance / amendment act, 1993. the explanation excludes certain purposes from the purview of the expression commercial purpose “ a case of exception to an exception. let us elaborate : a person ..... matter does not come even under the explanation which was introduced on the same day i.e. on 15-3-2003 by way of the amendment by the same amendment act, as it is nobodys case that the goods bought and used by the respondent herein and the services availed by the respondent were exclusively for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 2014 (TRI)

Mohammad Momid Khan Vs. Magma Leasing Limited, Through: Managing Direc ...

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

Decided on : Apr-25-2014

..... obviate any confusion “ the expression large scale is not a very precise expression “ parliament stepped in and added the explanation to section 2(1)(d) by ordinance / amendment act, 1993. the explanation excludes certain purposes from the purview of the expression commercial purpose “ a case of exception to an exception. let us elaborate : a person ..... obviate any confusion “ the expression large scale is not a very precise expression “ parliament stepped in and added the explanation to section 2(1)(d) by ordinance / amendment act, 1993. the explanation excludes certain purposes from the purview of the expression commercial purpose “ a case of exception to an exception. let us elaborate : a person ..... matter does not come even under the explanation which was introduced on the same day i.e. on 15-3-2003 by way of the amendment by the same amendment act, as it is nobodys case that the goods bought and used by the respondent herein and the services availed by the respondent were exclusively for .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //