Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian boilers amendment act 2007 section 3 amendment of section 2 Court: punjab and haryana Year: 2014 Page 1 of about 95 results (0.159 seconds)

Mar 03 2014 (HC)

Present: Mr. Balraj Singh Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-03-2014

..... ).petitioners.the accused, in firs.information report (for short, fir) no.282 dated 22.11.2013 recorded under sections 326, 324, 506,148 and 149 of the indian penal code,1860 (for short, the ipc).recorded at police station, jandiala guru, district amritsar (annexure p1).seek quashing of the fir saying that the matter has been amicably settled between them and the ..... not private in nature and have serious impact on society. similarly, any compromise between the victim and offender in relation to the offences under special statutes like prevention of corruption act or the offences committed by public servants while working in that capacity etc.cannot provide for any basis for quashing criminal proceedings involving such offences. but the criminal cases having .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 12 2014 (HC)

Present : Mr. Balraj Singh Advocate Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jun-12-2014

..... integrity of this document high court chandigarh crl.misc.no.m-20508 of 2014 (o&m) 2 case, the law regards her as a major vide section 3 of the indian majority act, 1875. a major is deemed by the law to know what is in his or her welfare. (2) the wish of the girl. in the circumstances, we direct that ..... as under : there is no law which prohibits a girl under 18 years from falling in love with someone else. neither falling in love with somebody is an offence under ipc or any other penal law. desiring to marry her love is also not an offence. a young girl, who is in love has two courses available to her one is ..... nobody will harass, threaten or commit any acts of violence or other unlawful act on the petitioner, chanchali devi/mehvesh anjum and the petitioner's family members and they shall not be arrested till further orders in connection with the case in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 11 2014 (HC)

Date of Decision: 11.2.2014 Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-11-2014

..... inequality of bargaining power. such contracts will not fall within the four corners of the definition of "undue influence" as defined by section 16(1) of the indian contract act. the majority of such contracts are in a standard or prescribed form or consist of a set of rules. they are not contracts between individuals containing terms ..... of completed work and without prejudice to any other right or remedy of government in respect of any such delay, be deleted and the works order, as so amended forthwith, billed for final payment. no further claims shall be made by the contractor after submission of a final bill and these shall be deemed to have ..... interest. such a contract or such a clause in a contract ought, therefore, to be adjudged void under section 23 of the indian contract act, as opposed to public policy."and still further; " the indian contract act does not define the expression "public policy" or "opposed to public policy". from the very nature of things, such expressions are .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 07 2014 (HC)

Present: Mr. Rajesh Lamba Advocate Vs. Presiding Officer Industrial Tr ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-07-2014

..... and drawing salary of `8,650/- and, therefore, was working in supervisory capacity and did not fall within the definition of workman as per the un-amended provisions of the act. finding was also recorded that the claim of arrears of the increments and how the figure of `1,15,000/- became due, was never proved and even the ..... he was also drawing salary of `8,650/- per month, which was more than the salary of `1,600/- per month as per the un-amended provisions of the act. once the petitioner was not a workman and he was doing the above said duties, the labour court thus would have no jurisdiction to adjudicate on the said issue. ..... challenging the order dated 14.08.2012 (annexure p-1) vide which, the application filed by the petitioner under section 33-c(2) of the industrial disputes act, 1947 (in short 'the act') was dismissed. the reasoning that prevailed with the labour court, faridabad was that as per the case of the petitioner himself, he was working as branch manager .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 15 2014 (HC)

a Petition Under Section 13(B) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Vs. Mukes ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-15-2014

..... order causing great prejudice to the cause of the petitioner who in addition to being a non- resident indian (nri) is also a senior citizen.5. stand of the respondents, on the other hand, is that the application for amendment is vague and fluid and thus, being of no consequence was rightly rejected.6. hearing has been ..... mr. kunal mulwani, advocate for the respondents. dr. bharat bhushan parsoon, j.a petition under section 13(b) of the east punjab urban rent restriction act, 1949 (for short, the act) filed for eviction of the tenant on 17.7.2012 by the petitioner-landlord is pending adjudication before the rent controller, chandigarh, which is at the ..... initial stage.2. an application for amendment of the petition to introduce one para which allegedly had been wrongly omitted to be mentioned in the petition, already .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 13 2014 (HC)

Present: Ms. Ritu Punj Additional Advocate General Punjab, Vs. Sukhwin ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-13-2014

..... case, the learned additional sessions judge, ludhiana, vide judgment dated 5.10.2000 convicted accused sukhwinder singh @ bhap for an offence under sections 302 ipc and 27 of the arms act and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and a fine of ` 2,000/- or in default thereafter to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period ..... against the acquittal of accused baljit singh, gurbachan singh, amrish kumar and jagdish lal for offence under section 302 read with section 149 ipc; acquittal of accused baljit singh under sections 307 and 25 of the arms act; acquittal of sukhwinder singh, gurbachan singh, amrish kumar and jagdish lal under section 307 read with section 149 ..... ipc and acquittal of all the accused for offence under section 148 ipc. prosecution version is that on 16.3.1999 at about 10:00 p.m. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 2014 (HC)

Present: Ms. G.K. Mann Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-28-2014

..... and impugned criminal proceedings arising out of fir no.76 dated 04.05.2007, under sections 326, 325, 324, 323, 148 read with section 149 of ipc registered at police station ajnala, district amritsar rural and its cross version as well as all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom qua the petitioners in both the petitions, ..... firs.information report (for short 'fir') no.76 dated 04.05.2007, under sections 326, 325, 324, 323, 148 read with section 149 of indian penal code (for short 'ipc') registered at police station ajnala, district amritsar rural, on the basis of compromise effected between the parties. similarly, criminal misc. no.m-40326 of ..... of the court. in respect of serious offences like murder, rape, dacoity, etc.or other offences of mental depravity under ipc or offences of moral turpitude under special statutes, like prevention of corruption act or the offences committed by public servants while working in that capacity, the settlement between offender and victim can have no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 20 2014 (HC)

Present: Mr. Vinod Ghai Senior Advocate with Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-20-2014

..... rigorous imprisonment for five years and to pay fine of `3000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo further imprisonment for two months. under section 120b ipc accused baljit is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay fine of `5000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo further imprisonment for ..... conspiracy has been well laid down by the hon'ble apex court in ram narayan popali vs cbi2003volume (3) s.c.cases 641 which provides that no overt act is required to be done in furtherance of the conspiracy which can be proved by direct evidence which is rarely available or by circumstantial evidence or by both. though ..... having sent a telegram to higher authorities regarding theft of canal water and that they could harm him along with baljit, who was committing theft of the canal water. acting on this, complainant pardeep kumar pw1 reached rest house, pegan along with others and heard shrieks of 'bachao bachao' coming from the room of the rest house. when .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 24 2014 (HC)

Vijay Bansal Advocate Vs. the State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-24-2014

..... introduced before the vidhan sabha in terms aforesaid which has been passed and is now awaiting assent of the governor of haryana and with this amendment the provisions of the two acts would not operate upon the village areas comprised within the chand parkash 2014.03.25 10:18 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of ..... seeking to challenge notifications dated 30.10.2012 (annexures p/9 and p/10) issued by the haryana government seeking to amend, vide annexure p/9, the punjab scheduled roads and controlled areas restriction of unregulated development act, 1963 in its application to the state of haryana whereby clause (a) of section 15 of the punjab new capital ..... this document cwp-6169-2010 -3- phirni of the village fixed at the time of consolidation under the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act 1948. insofar as the state of punjab is concerned, the issue of extension of abadi deh of villages has received the attention of gmada in the periphery area .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 22 2014 (HC)

Manoj Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-22-2014

..... haryana & ors.crl. writ petition no.2104 of 2012, decided on 14.12.2012. it has been contended that the division bench has considered the amendment in section 5-a of the principal act and the petitioner is not entitled to any concession. it was also urged that the request for release on agricultural parole was made in december 2012, ..... . on the basis of that report, the superintendent of police noted that the petitioner was undergoing sentence in case fir no.444 dated 04.10.1993, under section 302 ipc, police station city, bhiwani and there were five other cases registered against him, the details of which are contained in annexure r-1. apart from that, the petitioner ..... out agricultural pursuits. the brief facts are that the petitioner was tried in fir no.444 dated 04.10.1993, under sections 302 and 307 read with section 34 ipc, police station city, bhiwani and was convicted to life imprisonment. the petitioner was released on emergency parole for a period of three weeks upto 30.11.1998, but .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //