Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Decided on : Feb-19-2014
..... view to obviate any confusion”the expression œlarge scale? is not a very precise expression”parliament stepped in and added the expla-nation to section 2(d)(i) by ordinance/amendment act, 1993. the explanation excludes certain purposes from the purview of the expression œcommercial purpose?”a case of exception to an exception.? 17. reliance was also placed on morgan stanley ..... was inserted by act 50 of 1993. it was further substituted w.e.f. 15.3.2003. the ..... must be borne in mind that the definition œconsumer?, has been amended, from time-to-time. the main question is, when the cause of action was arisen. the definition œconsumer?, was amended by act 50 of 1993, w.e.f. 18.6.1993. again, it was amended in the year 2003 by act 62 of 2002, w.e.f. 15.3.2003. earlier expression .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Decided on : May-06-2014
..... carrying vehicle and light goods-carrying vehicle. 9. in this regard, it shall be worthwhile to have a look at the provisions contained in the motor vehicles act, 1988 as amended from time to time and the central motor vehicles rules, 1989 concerning the definition of the motor vehicles, both transport and non-transport, and then to examine ..... the supreme court in the case of œnational insurance co. ltd. versus annappa irappa nesaria and ors.? [reported in iv 2008 acc (169) sc.]. after the amendment that had taken place in the central motor vehicles rules in the year 2001, it was mandatory to have an endorsement on the licence to the effect that the ..... at the provisions, governing the grant of licence to drivers of motor vehicles. 10. section 2(21) of the motor vehicles act, 1988 states as follows:- œ(21) œlight motor .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Decided on : May-23-2014
..... of the complaint, the bank initiated proceedings against the respondents under the securitisation and reconstruction of financial assets and enforcement of security interest act, 2002 (for short œthe sarfaesi act?). the respondents amended the complaint praying for, in the alternative, a compensation of a sum of rs.19,44,000/- as computed therein. 6. ..... note that on receipt of re-possession notice, dated 28.07.2007, from the bank under the provisions of the sarfaesi act, the respondents had filed an application in the state commission for amendment of the complaint, inter-alia stating thus: œcomplainants now pray that in view of all that is stated above and ..... for not executing conveyance deed in their favour and (iii) since the possession of the flat had already been delivered to the bank in proceedings under sarfaesi act, the same had been auctioned, the auction purchaser was put in possession after execution of conveyance deed in their favour, the impugned directions are incapable of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Decided on : May-07-2014
..... is relatable to his business activity and, therefore, it will fall in the category of commercial purpose, which has been taken out of the purview of the consumer protection act, 1986, vide amendment act no.62 of 2002, effective from 15th of march, 2003. 17. against the said order of this commission, special leave petition (civil appeal no. 6229 of 2012, ..... a view to obviate any confusion “ the expression œlarge scale? is not a very precise expression “ parliament stepped in and added the explanation to section 2(d)(i) by ordinance/ amendment act, 1993. 12. this commission in the case of jag mohan chhabra and anr. vs. dlf universal ltd. iv (2007) cpj 199 (nc), held, as under :- œin a somewhat ..... not applicable to this case. in that case, the cause of action had arisen on 01.02.1991 as is apparent from para 2 of the judgment. 6. the amendment act 1993 and 2002/03 were not brought into force till then. we are to decide this case in accordance with the law which prevails here as under. the word .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Decided on : Feb-05-2014
..... remanded to the district consumer forum, ghaziabad for rehearing of the said issue and a fresh decision in accordance with law. in case the complainant prays for amendment of his complaint, his application shall be allowed, and then the complaint is heard on the issue of taxes alone.? 5. thereafter, the petitioner was heard ..... limits of ghaziabad municipal corporation. but instead of taking the right course of action before a competent forum, he filed his complaint under the consumer protection act before the district consumer forum, ghaziabad without realizing that it was not a case of deficiency in service as the complainant himself stated that neither any ..... of the state commission where such state commission has exercised jurisdiction not vested in it by law, or has failed to exercise jurisdiction so vested, or has acted in the exercise of its jurisdiction illegally or with material irregularity. 11. hon'ble supreme court in mrs. rubi(chandra) dutta vs. united india insurance company .....
Tag this Judgment!