Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian boilers amendment act 2007 section 3 amendment of section 2 Year: 2014 Page 15 of about 1,752 results (0.492 seconds)

Nov 19 2014 (SC)

Rakesh Baban Borhade Vs. the State of Maharashtra and anr Etc.Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-19-2014

..... submissions of the learned counsel for the appearing parties and perused the impugned order and the materials on record.8. sub-section (1) of section 438 has been amended by cr.p.c. (amendment) act 2005 (act 25 of 2005), by which old sub-section (1) has been substituted by new sub-sections (1), (1a) and (1b). the guiding factors for grant of anticipatory ..... a private complaint filed by m/s. merit magnum construction alleging commission of offences against the appellant and other accused u/s 420, 406, 423, 424 r/w section 34 ipc wherein directions were issued by the magistrate u/s 156 (3) cr.p.c. for proper investigation. case of the complainant is that on 21.12.2005, the seven companies .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 2014 (SC)

Rakesh Baban Borhade Vs. the State of Maharashtra and anr Etc.Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-19-2014

..... submissions of the learned counsel for the appearing parties and perused the impugned order and the materials on record.8. sub-section (1) of section 438 has been amended by cr.p.c. (amendment) act 2005 (act 25 of 2005), by which old sub-section (1) has been substituted by new sub-sections (1), (1a) and (1b). the guiding factors for grant of anticipatory ..... a private complaint filed by m/s. merit magnum construction alleging commission of offences against the appellant and other accused u/s 420, 406, 423, 424 r/w section 34 ipc wherein directions were issued by the magistrate u/s 156 (3) cr.p.c. for proper investigation. case of the complainant is that on 21.12.2005, the seven companies .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 04 2014 (HC)

Simpkins School Vs. Director General of Income-tax, (Investigation)

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-04-2014

..... 2006 there was no time limit fixed for passing an order granting or refusing to grant approval for exemption. the ninth proviso was inserted by taxation laws amendment act, 2006, which provided that the application filed under the first proviso shall be approved or an order rejecting the application shall be passed within the period of ..... years 2003-04 to 2009-10 are deemed to have been sanctioned/approved under the 9th proviso to section 10(23c)(vi) of the act, which has been inserted by the tax laws amendment act, 2006 w.e.f. 1st april, 2006. 6. the respondents in the counter affidavit has contended that the application was rightly ..... order that the director general of income tax (investigation) had misdirected itself in not considering the stipulated conditions mentioned under section 10(23c)(vi) of the act and had digressed from the main issue in considering irrelevant consideration. we find that the prescribed authority has considered the expenditures depicted by the petitioner in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 12 2014 (HC)

Rakesh Gurjar and Others Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-12-2014

..... applicants invited our attention to the provisions of section 163 and then to section 41, in particular, clause (ii) (b) of the code, as inserted by amendment act no. 5 of 2009, and section 46 of the code to contend that the police officer can arrest a person only on fulfilling the requirements specified by the ..... amending act. further, the arrest cannot be for the purpose of extracting admission/confession or compelling the accused to give false evidence whilst in police custody by force or under coercion. that act of the police would result in the commission of offences under sections 195a, 319 and 330 of ipc. necessarily, therefore, when ..... particular. 5. we have given our anxious consideration to the argument canvassed on behalf of the applicants. the requirement of complying with the conditions specified in amended section 41 of the code will arise only at the time of arrest of the applicants. the fact that the applicants are likely to be arrested by itself .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 10 2014 (HC)

Directorate of Education Vs. Action Committee Unaided Recognized Priva ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-10-2014

..... december, 2013 of hon ble the lt. governor of delhi. the order dated 18th december, 2013, called the recognized schools (admission procedure for pre-primary classes) (amendment) order, 2013 (admission order 2013) was issued by hon ble the lt. governor in exercise of the powers conferred by section 3(1) of the delhi school education ( ..... dse) act, 1973 read with rule 43 of the delhi school education (dse) rules, 1973 and amending the recognized schools (admission procedure for pre-primary class) order, 2007 (admission order 2007). vide the admission order 2013, the 20 ..... ) 8 scc1 (ix) that the except the proviso to section 12(1)(c), none of the other provisions of right of children to free and compulsory education act, 2009 (rte act) apply to nursery admissions; reliance in this regard is placed on a judgment of division bench of this court in social jurist, a civil rights group vs. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 10 2014 (HC)

Social Jurist, a Civil Rights Group Vs. Action Committee Unaided Recog ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-10-2014

..... december, 2013 of hon ble the lt. governor of delhi. the order dated 18th december, 2013, called the recognized schools (admission procedure for pre-primary classes) (amendment) order, 2013 (admission order 2013) was issued by hon ble the lt. governor in exercise of the powers conferred by section 3(1) of the delhi school education ( ..... dse) act, 1973 read with rule 43 of the delhi school education (dse) rules, 1973 and amending the recognized schools (admission procedure for pre-primary class) order, 2007 (admission order 2007). vide the admission order 2013, the 20 ..... ) 8 scc1 (ix) that the except the proviso to section 12(1)(c), none of the other provisions of right of children to free and compulsory education act, 2009 (rte act) apply to nursery admissions; reliance in this regard is placed on a judgment of division bench of this court in social jurist, a civil rights group vs. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 10 2014 (HC)

Directorate of Education Vs. Action Committee Unaided Recognized Priva ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-10-2014

..... december, 2013 of hon ble the lt. governor of delhi. the order dated 18th december, 2013, called the recognized schools (admission procedure for pre-primary classes) (amendment) order, 2013 (admission order 2013) was issued by hon ble the lt. governor in exercise of the powers conferred by section 3(1) of the delhi school education ( ..... dse) act, 1973 read with rule 43 of the delhi school education (dse) rules, 1973 and amending the recognized schools (admission procedure for pre-primary class) order, 2007 (admission order 2007). vide the admission order 2013, the 20 ..... ) 8 scc1 (ix) that the except the proviso to section 12(1)(c), none of the other provisions of right of children to free and compulsory education act, 2009 (rte act) apply to nursery admissions; reliance in this regard is placed on a judgment of division bench of this court in social jurist, a civil rights group vs. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 10 2014 (HC)

Social Jurist, a Civil Rights Group Vs. Action Committee Unaided Recog ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-10-2014

..... december, 2013 of hon ble the lt. governor of delhi. the order dated 18th december, 2013, called the recognized schools (admission procedure for pre-primary classes) (amendment) order, 2013 (admission order 2013) was issued by hon ble the lt. governor in exercise of the powers conferred by section 3(1) of the delhi school education ( ..... dse) act, 1973 read with rule 43 of the delhi school education (dse) rules, 1973 and amending the recognized schools (admission procedure for pre-primary class) order, 2007 (admission order 2007). vide the admission order 2013, the 20 ..... ) 8 scc1 (ix) that the except the proviso to section 12(1)(c), none of the other provisions of right of children to free and compulsory education act, 2009 (rte act) apply to nursery admissions; reliance in this regard is placed on a judgment of division bench of this court in social jurist, a civil rights group vs. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 2014 (HC)

Pradoshkumar Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Dec-20-2014

..... content was found in the samples taken from all these toddy shops. addition of materials like starch being an offence punishable under section 57 (b) of the act in view of the amendment brought to the rules in 2007, the excise w.p (c) nos. 38400/2010, 5546 & 9142 of 2011, 2544 of 2012, & crl.m. ..... and kept for sale under licence issued in kerala shall conform to such specifications and restrictions as may be notified by government, based on scientific studies and indian standard specifications. it was in terms of this provision, the government of kerala issued the government notification dated 14.2.2007 (sro145of 2007) prescribing the specifications ..... drawn from any coconut, palmyra, or choondapana palms, and conforming to such specification and restrictions as may be notified by government, based on scientific studies and indian standard specifications. thus it is quite clear that any licensee or salesman found selling toddy, which does not conform to the definition of toddy under rule 2( .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 02 2014 (FN)

Mccutcheon Vs. Federal Election Comm’n

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Apr-02-2014

..... .g., arizona free enterprise club s freedom club pac v. bennett, 564 u. s. ___, ___. the federal election campaign act of 1971 (feca), as amended by the bipartisan campaign reform act of 2002 (bcra), imposes two types of limits on campaign contributions. base limits restrict how much money a donor may contribute to ..... the majority, and plainly can include laws that restrict free speech. the whole point of the first amendment is to afford individuals protection against such infringements. the first amendment does not protect the government, even when the government purports to act through legislation reflecting collective speech. cf. united states v. alvarez, 567 u. s. ___ ( ..... in the democratic process. the aggregate limits are therefore invalid under the first amendment. i a for the 2013 2014 election cycle, the base limits in the federal election campaign act of 1971 (feca), as amended by the bipartisan campaign reform act of 2002 (bcra), permit an individual to contribute up to $2,600 per .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //