Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Identification - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 30 2024

Unique Identification Authority of India, vs K.Ramachandran

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jan-30-2024

TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 10TH MAGHA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 38899 OF 2023 PETITIONER: UNIQUE IDENTIFICATION AUTHORITY OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY DEPUTY DIRECTOR GENERAL, 3RD FLOOR, SOUTH WING, KHANJIJA BHAVAN, 49, RACE COURSE ROAD,


Mar 26 2026

Force Identification Pvt.Ltd, Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-26-2026

M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER W.A. No. 771 of 2026 and C.M.P.No.7941 of 2026 Force Identification Pvt.Ltd, (CIN U74999KA2017PTC108058), Rep. by its Director, Having its Registered office at 504, 5th Cross, 2nd Block, Matadahalli,


May 22 2026

Subramanian Vaidyanathan vs Unique Identification Authority of India & ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-22-2026

AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 7259/2026 SUBRAMANIAN VAIDYANATHAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Lalit Bhardwaj and Mr. Jatin Anand Dwivedi, Advocates.versusUNIQUE IDENTIFICATION AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 22.05.2026 CM APPL. 35507/2026 (for exemption)1.


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 06 2026

Muzassim vs Unique Identification Authority of India

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-06-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 11110/2024 MUZASSIM .....Petitioner Through: None.versusUNIQUE IDENTIFICATION AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Nirvikar Verma & Mr. Varun Kumar, Advs.CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER%


Jul 22 2024

Angel vs Unique Identification Authority of India (Uidai)

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jul-22-2024

YOHANNAN, BY ADVS. SRI. M. M. ZIYAD SRI. T. A. PRAKASH SMT. M. J. SAJITHA RESPONDENTS: 1 UNIQUE IDENTIFICATION AUTHORITY OF INDIA (UIDAI), GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, REP.BY ITS DIRECTOR GENERAL, BANGLA SAHIB ROAD, BEHIND KALIMANDIR, GOLE MARKET,


Aug 23 2023

Forum of Akshaya Centre Entrepreneurs (Face) vs the Unique Identificat ...

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Aug-23-2023

BUS STAND, POOVAR P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695525 BY ADVS. MANAS P HAMEED K. REMIYA RAMACHANDRANRESPONDENT/S:1 THE UNIQUE IDENTIFICATION AUTHORITY OF INDIA (UIDAI) GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, BANGLA SAHIB RD, BEHIND KALI MANDIR, GOLE MARKET, NEW DELHI ,


Jan 20 2023

Baisil Attipety @ Basil Ag vs the Unique Identification Authority of I ...

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jan-20-2023

POOTHULLIL JUNCTION, M.M.ROAD, NEAR NORTH GATE OF HIGH COURT, ERNAKULAM, PIN 682918. BY ADV SRI.A.G.BASIL RESPONDENTS:1 THE UNIQUE IDENTIFICATION AUTHORITY OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS DEPUTY DIRECTOR GENERAL, REGIONAL OFFICE, BANGALORE-560001. 2 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY


May 31 2011

Hcl Technologies Limited Vs. Unique Identification Authority of India

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-31-2011

1. This is a suit for grant of perpetual injunction. Defendant No.2 Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) which is stated to be an office attached to the Planning Commission, to issue,


Mar 23 2026

G.MURUGESAN Vs The Chairman of the Willful defaulter identification co ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-23-2026

G.Murugesan Managing partner, M/s.Gurusamy Realtors and Promotors No.110A, Subramaniyapuram, Venkitapuram, ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Chairman of the Willful defaulter identification committee Executive Director,2. The Zonal manager Recovery and Legal Department,3. Indian Bank Rep. by its Manager Lawley Road


Aug 04 2008

Dr. Nikhil D. Dattar, Gynaecologist, Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-04-2008

Reported in: (2008)110BOMLR3293

are no other structural anomalies in the heart.5) In the echocardiogram done outside, no other structural anomalies are identified.6) Only small percentage of kids will be symptomatic and will require implantation of the pace make costing less


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial