Held - Judgment Search Results
The Tribunal Held That the Deceased Was in the Age Group of Vs. Smt.Sh ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
Nagpal Rice Mills and drawing salary of Rs.10,000/- per month. FAO No.4136 of 2012 (O&M) [2].5. The Tribunal held that the deceased was in the age group of 31-35 years. He rejected the evidence regarding his occupation
“it Is Clearly Held in Supreme Court Cases That there Is an Inherent ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-16-2012
has no cause of action. The trial Court dismissed the application with the following observations:- “It is clearly held in Supreme Court cases that there is an inherent right to a person to bring a suit of
and High Courts Have Repeatedly Held That the Exercise of Vs. State of ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
reads thus:-“12. An identical legal position ensures within this country CWP No.13694 o”3. and High Courts have repeatedly held that the exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution is discretionary and not obligatory without being
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Cwp No.18119 of 1994 Vs. State of Punjab and Others This Court Had Hel ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-11-2013
clarified that in Civil Writ Petition No.13402 of 1991-M.M.Aggarwal Vs. State of Punjab and others, this Court had held that the instructions dated 1.9.1989 could not be applied retrospectively and any Government employee, who fulfilled the conditions
Terms. in Cwp No.4698 of 2013 It Has Been Held as Under:- Vs. Punjab U ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-20-2013
the instant petition be also disposed of in the same terMs.In CWP No.4698 of 2013 it has been held as under:- “Learned counsel for the petitioners assert that there is a stay on further construction in CWP
it Was Held in the Following Terms:- Vs. State of Punjab and Others -- ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-31-2014
issuance of directions for registration of an F.I.R in exercise of powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C, it was held in the following terms:- Lucky 2014.01.31 16:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh
Present: Mr. S.S. Sidhu Advocate Vs. State of Haryana (1995) 1 Scc 349 ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-07-2014
relied upon Brij Nandan Jaiswal versus Munna @ Munna Jaiswal and another, 2009 (1) SCC678 wherein it was held as under:- “7. It is now a settled law that complainant can always question the order granting bail
“further as Noted by the Commissioner the Civil Court Also Held Vs. ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-15-2014
however, dismissed the revision petition observing as follows:- “Further as noted by the Commissioner, the civil court also held that the possession of the plaintiff (present petitioneRs.over the suit land as tenants under the defendants No.2 and
Case of the State Tax on Foreign-held Bonds
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1872
subjects. 2. Bonds issued by a railroad company are property in the hands of the holders, and when held by nonresidents of the state in which the company was incorporated, they are property beyond the jurisdiction of
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free