Grievance - Judgment Search Results
Lalithambika vs Grievance Redressal Committee
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-14-2023
S/O LATE SASIDHARAN PILLAI, SALINI BHAVAN, AAYOOR KOLLAM - 691 533. BY ADV PRAVEEN K. JOY RESPONDENT/S: 1 GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL COMMITTEE STATE BANK OF INDIA, CHADAYAMANGALAM BRANCH, CHADAYAMANGALAM, KOLLAM PIN-691 534. 2 STATE BANK OF INDIA CHADAYAMANGALAM
Grievances of Aged and Disabled Person Vs. State of J and K and ors.
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Mar-29-2006
Reported in: 2006(2)JKJ692
ORDER1. Mr. Anmol Sharma, a law student, has addressed a communication to this Court, inviting its attention to the alleged ailing state of affairs in the Home for the aged and infirm at Ambphalla, called 'Vridh...
Indian Exporters Grievance Forum and anr. Vs Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-05-2010
or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in Digest? Yes1. Petitioner No.1 is the Indian Exporters Grievance Forum, which is a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and having as its members professional
18-section briefs on any result in this list
“The Grievance of the Petitioner Is That He Had Exchanged Land with ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
was issued on 25.07.2011, following contention of the counsel for the petitioner was noticed by this Court: “The grievance of the petitioner is that he had exchanged land with the Mustarka land on the asking of Panchayat
Grievance Advanced by Counsel for the Petitioner Is That the Vs. Rasul ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-04-2013
Taking note of above said averment, following order was passed by this Court on 13.2.2013 :- “The petitioner's grievance is that he has not been given an opportunity to file a reply as his case was decided
“ the Grievance of the Petitioner Is That Vide Order Vs. State of Pu ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-09-2013
came up for hearing when following order was passed :- Amended CWP No.14970 of 2010 -2- “ The grievance of the petitioner is that vide order dated 23.8.2010, a direction was given to the respondents to consider
The Grievances Redressal Office Vs. Raju.M.Thomas
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jan-13-2014
POUSHA, 1935 RP.No. 755 of 2013 IN W.A.NO. 1889/2009 -------------------------- REVIEW PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS1& 2 IN W.A: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE GRIEVANCES REDRESSAL OFFICER, (AGRICULTURAL DEBT WAIVER AND RELIEF SCHEME2008 MEENACHIL EAST URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD, POONJAR EAST, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.2.
The Short Grievance of the Petitioners in the Vs. Bhagwan Sarup @ Bhag ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-09-2014
Mohinder 2014.07.30 12:13 I attest to the accuracy of this order Chandigarh CWP No.12939 of 2014 [2].The short grievance of the petitioners in the instant writ petition is that their land, particulars whereof are tabulated in Annexure
Dacey Vs. Grievance Committee, Bar, Fairfield County.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-17-1967
DACEY v. GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE, BAR, FAIRFIELD COUNTY. - 386 U.S. 683 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court Reports DACEY v. GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE, BAR,
Smt. Rekha Kushwaha vs.public Grievance Commission and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2018
of Decision:13. 3.2018 + W.P.(C) 2289/2018 SMT. REKHA KUSHWAHA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Adv. versus PUBLIC GRIEVANCE COMMISSION AND ORS...... Respondent Through: Mr. Jawahar Raja, ASC with Mr. Chinmay Kanojia, Adv. for R-1, 2, 4,
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free