Dacey Vs. Grievance Committee, Bar, Fairfield County.

Dacey vs Grievance Committee, Bar, Fairfield County.

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Apr-17-1967

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101706

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/101706
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Apr-17-1967
Case Number: 386 U.S. 683
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dacey

Respondent

Grievance Committee, Bar, Fairfield County.

Excerpt

dacey v. grievance committee, bar, fairfield county. - 386 u.s. 683 (1967) u.s. supreme court reports dacey v. grievance committee, bar, fairfield county., 386 u.s. 683 (1967) dacey v. grievance committee, bar, fairfield county., 386 u.s. 683 (1967) 386 u.s. 683 dacey et al. v. grievance committee of the bar of fairfield county. appeal from the supreme court of connecticut. no. 1049. decided april 17, 1967. 154 conn. 129, 222 a. 2d 339, appeal dismissed. george a. saden for appellants. david goldstein and jacob d. zeldes for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 386 u.s. 683, 684

Full Judgment

DACEY v. GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE, BAR, FAIRFIELD COUNTY. - 386 U.S. 683 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court Reports DACEY v. GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE, BAR, FAIRFIELD COUNTY., 386 U.S. 683 (1967) DACEY v. GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE, BAR, FAIRFIELD COUNTY., 386 U.S. 683 (1967) 386 U.S. 683

DACEY ET AL. v. GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE OF THE BAR OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT.
No. 1049.
Decided April 17, 1967.

154 Conn. 129, 222 A. 2d 339, appeal dismissed.

George A. Saden for appellants.

David Goldstein and Jacob D. Zeldes for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 386 U.S. 683, 684

Same Parties Dacey vs Grievance Committee, Bar, Fairfield County. Same Subject Land Acquisition