Gratification - Year 2016 - Judgments

Feb 25 2016 (HC)

Prabhakar and Another Vs. The Central Bureau of Investigation, through ...

Court: Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on: Feb-25-2016

..... 409 prevention of corruption act 1988 section 13 2 section 13 1 c d illegal gratification non applicant alleged that applicants accused abused their official position and entered into criminal conspiracy .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 05 2016 (SC)

Mukhtiar Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jul-05-2016

..... not guilty of the offence defined in this section b gratification the word gratification is not restricted to pecuniary gratifications or to gratifications estimable in money c legal remuneration the words legal ..... of any evidence with regard to demand and acceptance of the amount as illegal gratification hence the burden rests on the accused to displace the statutory presumption raised under .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 03 2016 (HC)

Ganesan and Another Vs. State by Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigi ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-03-2016

..... informed his owner ramarao pw8 about the alleged demand made by the accused towards illegal gratification for not launching prosecution against the company as they were not willing to pay the ..... the form of complaint given by the defacto complainant to prove the demand of illegal gratification entrustment mahazar to show that amount smeared with phenolphthalein powder has been handed over to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 06 2016 (SC)

Krishan Chander Vs. State of Delhi

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-06-2016

..... fail mere acceptance of any amount allegedly by way of illegal gratification or recovery thereof dehors the proof of demand ipso facto ..... that the demand and acceptance of the amount of illegal gratification by the accused is a condition precedent to constitute an ..... acceptance in the sense that the accused has obtained the illegal gratification mere demand by itself is not sufficient to establish the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 19 2016 (HC)

D. Sampath Vs. The Inspector of Police, Special Investigation Cell, Vi ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-19-2016

..... the learned counsel for the petitioner with regard to the illegal gratification the complaint by a public servant against a private person ..... 8 of the pc act which is extracted hereunder 8 taking gratification in order by corrupt or illegal means to influence public ..... he accepts or attempts or agrees to accept the illegal gratification from a public servant to induce another public servant further .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 09 2016 (HC)

Satpal Singh Vs. State of Delhi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-09-2016

..... of section 7 pc act regarding motive for accepting illegal gratification of rs 500 has not been proved by the prosecution ..... act is reproduced as follows 20 presumption where public servant accepts gratification other than legal remuneration 1 where in any trial of ..... to obtain for himself or for any other person any gratification other than legal remuneration or any valuable things from any .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 07 2016 (HC)

Jeetendra Prasad Das and Ors Vs. The Union of India Through C B I

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Sep-07-2016

..... him appeared in written examination in his place and for that he had paid illegal gratification to shri santosh kr das who managed the other persons for him investigation established that ..... persons were appeared who came from patna and for that these candidates have paid illegal gratification hence he was the key conspirator through which offence of impersonation and cheating was committed .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 03 2016 (HC)

Katta Subramanya Naidu and Another Vs. State of Karnataka, Represented ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Nov-03-2016

..... of the prosecution is that there were transfer of funds which were characterized as illegal gratification that was ultimately received by the petitioner through the other accused the transfer was as ..... companies are the direct beneficiaries of the acquisition of land in return for which illegal gratification is allegedly received by the petitioner through others in view of the proceedings having been .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 18 2016 (HC)

Mahendra Mishra and Others Vs. State of Karnataka By The Assistant Com ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Nov-18-2016

..... the complainant in their attempt to instigate the complainant to agree to accept the illegal gratification therefore he would be equally culpable and there is no infirmity committed by the court ..... they had instigated or abetted the complainant a public servant to agree to receive illegal gratification and whether they could be prosecuted for an offence punishable under the said section is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 18 2016 (HC)

Sri. Mahendra Mishra Vs. State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Nov-18-2016

..... to instigate the complainant to agree to accept the illegal gratification therefore he would be equally culpable and there is no ..... the complainant a public servant to agree to receive illegal gratification and whether they could be prosecuted for an offence punishable ..... prosecuted for having instigated a public servant to receive illegal gratification insofar as the provisions of the ipc that are .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Gratification - Judgment Search Results