Gratification - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: gratification Page 1 of about 3,781 results (0.024 seconds)Mool Chand Vs. Rulia Ram Panna Lal and anr.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Reported in: AIR1963P& H516
..... or b explanation for the purposes of this clause the term gratification is not restricted to pecuniary gratifications or gratifications estimable in money and it includes all forms of entertainment and ..... to section 161 of the penal code which says gratification the word gratification is not restricted to pecuniary gratifications or to gratifications estimable in money rattan laf in his law of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTey Tsun Hang Vs. Public Prosecutor
Court: Singapore Supreme Court
..... 16 the second element relates to the causal or consequential link between the gratification and the act the gratification was intended to procure or reward the third element relates to whether that ..... using the word gift in this judgment to denote a gift simpliciter in contradistinction from gratification to connote a situation where something is received without believing that the giver expects a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNeeraj Dutta Vs. State(govt.of N.c.t.of Delhi)
Court: Supreme Court of India
..... not guilty of the offence defined in this section b gratification the word gratification is not restricted to pecuniary gratifications or to gratifications estimable in money c legal remuneration the words legal ..... the absence of evidence of complainant direct or primary evidence of demand of illegal gratification is it not permissible to draw inferential deduction of culpability guilt of a public .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr S M Mannan Vs. Central Bureau Of Investigation (anti Corruption Bur ...
Court: Karnataka
..... guilty of the offence defined in this section b gratification the word gratification is not restricted to pecuniary gratifications or to gratifications estimable in money c legal remuneration the words legal ..... evidence when reliance is placed on circumstantial evidence to prove the demand for gratification the prosecution must establish each and every circumstance from which the prosecution wants .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr.k.g Sreerangappa, Vs. The State By Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
..... guilty of the offence defined in this section b gratification the word gratification is not restricted to pecuniary gratifications or to gratifications estimable in money c legal remuneration the words legal ..... evidence when reliance is placed on circumstantial evidence to prove the demand for gratification the prosecution must establish each and every circumstance from which the prosecution wants .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMr Jagadeesha K Vs. State Of Karnataka Through
Court: Karnataka
..... guilty of the offence defined in this section b gratification the word gratification is not restricted to pecuniary gratifications or to gratifications estimable in money c legal remuneration the words legal ..... evidence when reliance is placed on circumstantial evidence to prove the demand for gratification the prosecution must establish each and every circumstance from which the prosecution wants .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri Appu Poojari A.t., Vs. The State By Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
..... guilty of the offence defined in this section b gratification the word gratification is not restricted to pecuniary gratifications or to gratifications estimable in money c legal remuneration the words legal ..... evidence when reliance is placed on circumstantial evidence to prove the demand for gratification the prosecution must establish each and every circumstance from which the prosecution wants .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNeeraj Dutta Vs. State(govt.of N.c.t.of Delhi)
Court: Supreme Court of India
..... guilty of the offence defined in this section b gratification the word gratification is not restricted to pecuniary gratifications or to gratifications estimable in money c legal remuneration the words legal ..... evidence when reliance is placed on circumstantial evidence to prove the demand for gratification the prosecution must establish each and every circumstance from which the prosecution wants .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri. Ashok M .s Vs. The Anti Corruption Bureau
Court: Karnataka
..... guilty of the offence defined in this section b gratification the word gratification is not restricted to pecuniary gratifications or to gratifications estimable in money c legal remuneration the words legal ..... evidence when reliance is placed on circumstantial evidence to prove the demand for gratification the prosecution must establish each and every circumstance from which the prosecution wants .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri.b.l. Keshava Murthy, Vs. The State By Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
..... guilty of the offence defined in this section b gratification the word gratification is not restricted to pecuniary gratifications or to gratifications estimable in money c legal remuneration the words legal ..... evidence when reliance is placed on circumstantial evidence to prove the demand for gratification the prosecution must establish each and every circumstance from which the prosecution wants .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial