Gratification - Judgment Search Results

Kootha Perumal. Vs. State Tr. Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

..... of corruption act 1988 sections 7 13 2 13 1 d 19 public servant taking gratification other than legal remuneration in respect of an official act the prosecution case briefly stated .....

S.Venkatappa Chetty .. Vs. State Rep. by Inspector of Police,

Court: Chennai

..... till it is established otherwise by proper proof of demand and acceptance of the illegal gratification the vital ingredient necessary to be established to procure a conviction for the offences ..... act 1988 by incorporating the said provision as hereunder 20 presumption where public servant accepts gratification other than legal remuneration 1 where in any trial of an offence punishable under section .....

Banarsi Dass Vs. State of Haryana

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT2010(3)SC552

..... secondly there must be acceptance in the sense that the accused has obtained the illegal gratification mere demand by itself is not sufficient to establish the offence therefore the other aspect ..... section 20 of the 1988 act raises a rebuttable presumption where the public servant accepts gratification other than legal remuneration which presumption is absent in the 1947 act despite this the .....

Madan Lal Vs. the State N.C.T. of Delhi

Court: Delhi

..... payable by mani ram comes to about rs 15000 accepting gratification other than legal remuneration on the pretext that he would ..... presumption could be drawn only on the prosecution establishing that gratification was paid or accepted by the public servant and not ..... the collocation of two expressions adjacent to each other like gratification or any valuable thing if acceptance of any valuable thing .....

State by Lokayuktha Police Vs. Chikka Nanjundaswamy

Court: Karnataka

..... of lokayukta pw4 at mandya over phone and informed him about demand of illegal gratification made by accused the investigating officer has not given explanation for securing shadow witnesses ..... the lokayukta police that pw1 had lodged first information alleging that accused was demanding illegal gratification for giving survival certificate regarding death of the father of pw1 the police inspector .....

Harvinder Singh Kohli Vs State

Court: Delhi

..... not guilty of the offence defined in this section b gratification the word gratification is not restricted to pecuniary gratifications or to gratifications estimable in money c legal remuneration the words legal ..... 7 of prevention of corruption act 1988 reads as under 7 public servant taking gratification other than legal remuneration in respect of an official act whoever being or expecting .....

V.Suresh. Vs. the State of A.P.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

..... accepted whether it can be said that the accused received illegal gratification as discussed supra when the demand had not been proved and ..... that when it is proved that the accused had accepted illegal gratification he is liable to be convicted under section 7 of the ..... evidence to show what was received by the accused is illegal gratification it appears that it is not safe to convict the accused .....

No. 3983839a Ex. Sep. (Nk) Purshotam Lal Versus Union of India Through ...

Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... had pleaded guilty of his own free will having been caught red handed accepting illegal gratification the appellant after completion of the basic military training at dogra regimental centre was posted ..... the army rules or the relevant procedures were violated all offences relating to obtaining of gratification as motive for procuring enrolment of any person are charged under section 64 e of .....

State of Karnataka Vs. T.Jayanna and ors

Court: Karnataka

..... being the chief officer of town municipality at sira had demanded illegal gratification of rs 15 000 from pw7 as a motive or reward to ..... town municipality at sira accused no l demanded and received remaining illegal gratification of rs 7 500 as a motive or reward to execute the ..... prove that on 21 06 2001 accused no l had demanded illegal gratification of rs 15 000 as a motive or reward to execute the .....

Lt Col P.Ahluwalia Versus Union of India Through Secretary to the Gove ...

Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... clerk balwinder singh as aforestated in the first charge a gratification as a motive for destruction of his accuseds medical board ..... singh pw2 and who instigated naik balwinder singh to accept gratification to accept the packet of liquor could not alone be ..... is somewhat reluctant to have the trap arranged even if the gratification is demanded by the government employee there were numerous reasons .....