Gratification - Year 2012 - Judgments

Mar 15 2012 (HC)

The State of KarnatakA. Vs. S I Ahamed Basha Son of N M Ibrahim Sab

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-15-2012

..... prevention of corruption act 1988 sections 7 13 1 d 13 2 public servant taking gratification other than legal remuneration in respect of an official act this criminal appeal is filed .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 01 2012 (TRI)

Col S.K. JaIn Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on: Jun-01-2012

..... 56 as regards the recovery of envelop with the alleged illegal gratification of which photocopies of 20 currency notes of rs 100 ..... as such the recovery of the envelop containing the illegal gratification from the possession of the applicant from his office of ..... and the recovery of the said envelop containing the illegal gratification from the office of applicant has not been proved conclusively .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 01 2012 (HC)

Sardarsinh Laxmansinh Bariya Vs. State of Gujarat

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Aug-01-2012

..... presumption referred to in either of the said subsections if the gratification or thing aforesaid is in its opinion so trivial that no ..... proved that the accused has accepted or agreed to accept any gratification the section does not say that the said condition should be ..... the accused and he accepted the same voluntarily as an illegal gratification 26 in view of above i am in complete agreement with .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 15 2012 (HC)

P.Palanisamy Vs. State Rep. by Inspector of Police.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-15-2012

..... currency note was recovered from the accused therefore the prosecution proved that the accused received gratification from the complainant and in such circumstances court can draw legal presumption that the said ..... doing not doing official act and the proof of acceptance or agreed to accept any gratification is condition precedent for drawing presumption under section 20 of evidence act admittedly an .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 30 2012 (HC)

Yashwant S/O. Sambhaji Dadmal Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court: Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on: Jul-30-2012

..... reads as under 8220 20 presumption where public servant accepts gratification other than legal remuneration 8211 1 where in any trial ..... to obtain for himself or for any other person any gratification other than legal remuneration or any valuable thing from any ..... the collocation of two expressions adjacent to each other like 8220 gratification or any valuable thing 8221 if acceptance of any valuable .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 29 2012 (HC)

The State,represented by Vs. Mr.Bagavathy Dass.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-29-2012

..... first accused as additional bribe money after receiving the phenolphthalein coated currency notes as illegal gratification as per his initial demand it is also quite improbable that the first respondent a1 ..... since the first respondent a1 had already received the phenolphthalein coated currency notes as illegal gratification this gives a reasonable doubt as to the conduct of pw 3 from ex p17 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 30 2012 (HC)

Yashwant S/O. Sambhaji Dadmal Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court: Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on: Jul-30-2012

..... attempted to obtain for himself or for any other person any gratification other than legal remuneration or any valuable thing from any ..... draw on the factual premise that there was payment of gratification this will again be fortified by looking at the collocation ..... of two expressions adjacent to each other like gratification or any valuable thing if acceptance of any valuable thing .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 29 2012 (SC)

Narendra Champaklal Trivedi and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-29-2012

..... the charges that they had demanded the amount towards illegal gratification but did not want to adduce any evidence in their ..... that the accused has accepted or agreed to accept any gratification the section does not say that the said condition should ..... proved that the accused has accepted or agreed to accept the gratification thereafter the bench produced a passage from madhukar bhaskarrao joshi .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 16 2012 (HC)

K.B.Madhavan Vs. State Rep. by Inspector of Police.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-16-2012

..... a presumption under section 20 of p c act where the public servant accepts the gratification other than legal remuneration in such circumstances the appellant accused has to give plausible explanation ..... to prove that the amount was not a illegal gratification other than legal remuneration 15 at this juncture it is appropriate to consider the decision .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 17 2012 (HC)

Satish Kumar Vs. State of Haryana

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Dec-17-2012

..... learned counsel for the appellant vehemently argued that the demand and acceptance of the illegal gratification is not proved ramesh chand complainant pw5 and randeep singh shadow witness pw6 who ..... complainant ramesh chand pw5 and randeep singh pw6 shadow witness demand and acceptance of illegal gratification alleged to have been received by the appellant accused for favouring ramesh chand pw5 for .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Gratification - Judgment Search Results