Go Devil - Judgment Search Results

Devilal Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

is more than 18 years of age. Prosecutrix herself had gone with the present applicant on her free will and lived

Devilal Vs. State of M.P.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 2002(84)ECC771; 2002(2)MPHT186; 2002(2)MPLJ301

of his cross-examination, has clearly admitted that some litigation was going on in between him and accused appellant at the relevant … N.K. Jain, J.1. Accused/appellant Devilal is convicted under Sections 8/18 of the Narcotic Drugs and

Devilal Vs. Kantabai

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: II(2000)DMC238

the notice of both Counsel appearing for the parties, who got the same noted by their signatures. Under these circumstances to

Devilal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 2002(1)WLC431; 2003(2)WLN293

is otherwise proved by the medical evidence of PW-6 Dr. Goruram and the statements of PW-2 Smt. Dhapu Bai and PW-7 … priest of the temple of Mataji. He found that appellant Devilal was giving lathi blows on the head of his father

Devilal and ors. Vs. Kishanlal and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: RLW2006(3)Raj2214; 2006(3)WLC61

2.7.1974. The property was never partitioned but because of no good relations between Moti Lai and his brother's wife Smt. Sosar,

Devilal Vs. Kinkar Narmadaprasad and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1982MP45

for consideration in this election petition is whethernon-joinder of Ramgir Goswami as a party to the petition, should entail its dismissal

Devilal and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1981WLN(UC)322

M.B. Sharma, J.1. The lands of the petitioner are situated in Chak 1 NGD. An outlet for the aforesaid Chak...

Devilal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1990WLN(UC)466

M.B. Sharma, J.1. After having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor, in the facts and...

Devilal Vs. Chander Singh

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1973Raj1; 1972()WLN571

placed on a Division Bench decision of this Court in Gopi Lal v. Hira Chand, ILR (1956) 6 Raj 694 in

Devilal Vs. Himat Ram and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1973Raj39

defendants that while entering into a subcontract with the plaintiff-appellant Devilal, the defendant Kanaiyalal acted as an agent for the rest