Go Devil - Judgment Search Results

Devilal Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

has been falsely implicated in this case. Prosecutrix is more than 18 years of age. Prosecutrix herself had gone with the present applicant on her free will and lived with him for about seven days but no

Devilal Vs. State of M.P.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 2002(84)ECC771; 2002(2)MPHT186; 2002(2)MPLJ301

evidence, witness Bothelal (P.W. 6) in Paragraph 28 of his cross-examination, has clearly admitted that some litigation was going on in between him and accused appellant at the relevant time. Under the circumstance, this witness cannot be … N.K. Jain, J.1. Accused/appellant Devilal is convicted under Sections 8/18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short 'the Act')

Devilal Vs. Kantabai

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: II(2000)DMC238

day (30.10.1999) and the same was brought to the notice of both Counsel appearing for the parties, who got the same noted by their signatures. Under these circumstances to say that it caused delay in filing appeal

Devilal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 2002(1)WLC431; 2003(2)WLN293

deceased Hardev died of homicidal death. This fact is otherwise proved by the medical evidence of PW-6 Dr. Goruram and the statements of PW-2 Smt. Dhapu Bai and PW-7 Kastur Chand.5. The entire case rests on the … was attracted by the out cry of Hardev, priest of the temple of Mataji. He found that appellant Devilal was giving lathi blows on the head of his father Hardev, as a result thereof, he fell down

Devilal and ors. Vs. Kishanlal and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: RLW2006(3)Raj2214; 2006(3)WLC61

date of purchase of the property i.e. from 2.7.1974. The property was never partitioned but because of no good relations between Moti Lai and his brother's wife Smt. Sosar, they started their separate kitchen. Moti Lai died

Devilal Vs. Kinkar Narmadaprasad and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1982MP45

ORDERM.L. Malik, J. 1. The question for consideration in this election petition is whethernon-joinder of Ramgir Goswami as a party to the petition, should entail its dismissal under Section 86 of the Representation of the

Devilal and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1981WLN(UC)322

M.B. Sharma, J.1. The lands of the petitioner are situated in Chak 1 NGD. An outlet for the aforesaid Chak is situated at stone No. 216. In this writ petition the grievance of the petitioners is...

Devilal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1990WLN(UC)466

M.B. Sharma, J.1. After having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor, in the facts and circumstances of the case. I allow this application and direct that the accused petitioner shall be...

Devilal Vs. Chander Singh

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1973Raj1; 1972()WLN571

suit,5. On behalf of the defendent reliance was placed on a Division Bench decision of this Court in Gopi Lal v. Hira Chand, ILR (1956) 6 Raj 694 in which it was held that the jurisdiction of

Devilal Vs. Himat Ram and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1973Raj39

contained in the plaint and admitted by the defendants that while entering into a subcontract with the plaintiff-appellant Devilal, the defendant Kanaiyalal acted as an agent for the rest of the partners. It further appears from para