Genuine - Judgment Search Results

Genuine Bottlers Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: [2006(1)JCR9(Jhr)]

Matched in: Parties Genuine Bottlers Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.

Genuine Paints and Chemicals Co. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 73(1998)DLT296

by the petitioner, was allowed by this Court vide order dated 24.2.1989 passed in Suit No. 2447/88 entitled Genuine Paints & Chemicals v. UOI and it was directed that the arbitration agreement filed in the Court and

Genuine Spares (India) Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2003)(162)ELT194TriDel

These are applications filed by the appellants in Appeal Nos.C/79-81/2003-NB(A) seeking dispensation with the pre-deposit.2. The appellant M/s. Genuine Spares India had imported a consignment of floor sweepings of plastics and acrylic sheet off cuts vide invoice

Genuine Spares (India) and ors. Vs. Cc

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2004)(117)LC951Tri(Delhi)

Matched in: Parties Genuine Spares (India) and ors. Vs. Cc

Genuine Spares (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Jaipur

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2002)(80)ECC228

consignments of the imported goods i.e. acrylic sheet off cut, the goods have been imported/dispatched directly from M/s. Genuine Corporation N.V. Katvilgweg 7B, 2050 ANT WERP, Belgium to the Indian importer, namely, the appellant. The export value

In Re: Genuine Insurance Co. Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1940Cal529

Act 4 of 1938, as amended by Act 11 of 1939. The appellants are a share-holder in the Genuine Insurance Co. Ltd., as also the Company itself: the Company in General Meeting having decided, as appears from

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Genuine Coffee and Tea

Court: Kerala

Reported in: [1992]198ITR105(Ker)

facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in finding that the firm was genuine, and that the Income-tax Officer was not justified in refusing registration till the date on which, according to

Roy and Others. the Compromise Is Genuine and Bonafide and Vs. State o ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

of this document High Court Chandigarh CRM not M-13608 of 2013 (O&M) -2- Roy and otheRs.The compromise is genuine and bonafide and has been entered into without any pressure or coercion. The compromise would help in bringing