Finding - Judgment Search Results

Notwithstanding Concurrent Findings of Rent Controller Dated Vs. Lakhb ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

BHUSHAN PARSOON Present: Mr. Anil Chawla, Advocate for the petitioner. **** Dr.Bharat Bhushan Parsoon, J.(Oral) 1. Notwithstanding concurrent findings of Rent Controller dated 13.12.2012 as also of the Appellate Authority dated 1.5.2014, ordering eviction of the petitioner-tenant

Whether the Finding Recorded by the Courts Below in Vs. Amar Kaur …r ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

marginal witness of the agreement as DW-3. On the basis of evidence led, the trial Court returned a finding that the defendant has executed the agreement to sell in favour of the plaintiff and has also received

The Statesman Ltd. and ors. Vs. the Fact Finding Committee and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1975Cal14

resolution No 19/3/72- Press, dated April 14, 1972. The Government of India decided to set up a Fact Finding Committee (hereinafter referred to as the Committee) with the Respondent No. 2, Bhabatosh Datta as the Chairman and

Bendix Corporation Vs. Radio Position Finding Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

BENDIX CORPORATION v. RADIO POSITION FINDING CORP. - 371 U.S. 577 (1963) U.S. Supreme Court BENDIX CORPORATION v. RADIO POSITION FINDING CORP., 371 U.S.

Forum for Fact Finding Documentation and Advocacy Vs. State of Chhatti ...

Court: Chhattisgarh

Reported in: 2006CriLJ4372; 2006(3)MPHT79

Matched in: Parties Forum for Fact Finding Documentation and Advocacy Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.

“7. We Do Not Find Any Force in the Arguments Raised by the Vs. Fina ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Singh versus State of Punjab & others 2005 (2) PLR 9.has held as under: “7. We do not find any force in the arguments raised by the counsel for the petitioner. It is well settled that the

“26. in View of My Above Discussion and Findings Suit of Vs. Vijay K ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Mukerian. The trial court decreed the suit in following terms:- “26. In view of my above discussion and findings, suit of plaintiff for possession of land measuring 1 Kanal and 6 Marlas being western part of KhaSr.no.510/125,

“9. After Having Heard Both the Sides I Find No Merit in Any of the ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

an idle exercise to question jurisdiction relating to this offence. High Court in appeal rightly set aside the finding of the trial court that it had no territorial jurisdiction because the cheque had been dishonoured in a

for the Reasons Aforesaid I Find No Merit in This Second Appeal. Vs. B ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

and far away from khaSr.No.1182. For the reasons aforesaid, I find no merit in this second appeal. Concurrent finding recorded by both the courts below to decree the suit of the plaintiff is justified by the evidence

“i Do Not Find Any Force in the Contention of the Petitioner That th ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

No.9490 of 1987 -2- following order was passed by the concerned officer on 9.7.1974 :- “I do not find any force in the contention of the petitioner that the path leading to the village pond, after running