Finance Act 1965 Section 31 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 1965 section 31 Court: rajasthan Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 320 results (0.41 seconds)Vijay Industries Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : May-17-2004
Reported in : (2004)190CTR(Raj)90; [2004]270ITR175(Raj)
is as it stood after the amendment made by the finance act 1981 whereby section 80ab was introduced i motilal pesticides the sub heading c in chapter vi of the it act as deductions in respect of certain income your lordships will act 1961 as required by section 80ab 6 1 under section 80rra where the gross total income of an assessee includes
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMahendra Synthetics (P) Itd . Vs. Asstt. Cit
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Feb-11-2004
Reported in : (2004)88TTJ(NULL)1055
in explanation 4 to section 271 1 c by the finance act no 2 with effect from 1 4 2003 and penalty under section 271 1 c was leviable income tax act 1961 s 271 1 c in the itat jodhpur bench reduction in loss nothing was mentioned in explanation 4 to section 271 1 c i e as to whether the same 900 under section 144 of the act vide order dated 31 12 1990 the aforesaid assessment was set aside and after
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFederation of Private Medical and Dental Colleges of Rajasthan Vs. Sta ...
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Sep-24-2004
Reported in : RLW2005(2)Raj905; 2005(1)WLC202
authorities civil and judicial in the territory of india shall act in aid of the supreme court 31 mr sharma also or direction to quash and set aside the notice under section 91 of cr p c with further direction to respondents of india shall act in aid of the supreme court 31 mr sharma also pointed out certain irregularities committed by the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhagirath Mal and anr. Vs. Smt. Yuvrani Sahiba Through Lrs.
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Jul-21-2004
Reported in : RLW2005(1)Raj113; 2004(4)WLC112
is not covered by section 13 1 c of the act as it is not a case of any new construction appellants 7 i have heard learned counsel for the parties section 13 1 c of the rajasthan premises control of rent
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAshwani Chobisa Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Oct-20-2004
Reported in : RLW2005(1)Raj389
it will be mined and with what method how the financing will be arranged what are the areas of environmental concerns to take necessary action under section 5 of the said act in respect of cases where the project proponents fail to by the respective state governments to take necessary action under section 5 of the said act in respect of cases where development of the area covered by the notification s o 319 e dated 7th may 1992 integrating environmental concerns and keeping
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSatish Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Sep-14-2004
Reported in : RLW2005(2)Raj1133; 2005(2)WLC638
such circumstances they had committed murder of the deceased their act would certainly fall within the ambit of exception 1 of the conviction of the accused appellant for the offence under section 302 34 ipc recorded by the learned addl sessions judge police head constable was competent to record the dying declaration 31 in p v radhakrishna v state of karnataka jt 2003
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShyam Sunder Vs. Narbada Devi and anr.
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Aug-19-2004
Reported in : RLW2005(1)Raj257; 2004(4)WLC544
11 of the bihar buildings lease rent and eviction control act 1982 the hon ble supreme court observed that it is pass the decree accordingly whereas sub para 2 of sub section 2 of section 14 of the act provides that where
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhagirath and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Aug-23-2004
Reported in : RLW2005(1)Raj322; 2004(4)WLC450
his conviction for offence under section 27 of the arms act is maintained for the offence under sections 324 i p he convicted all the accused appellants with the aid of section 149 i p c xi after being aggrieved by the is maintained while setting aside the order of sentence dtd 31 10 2000 passed by the learned additional sessions judge raisinghnagar
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Coordinator of All India Engineering/Pharmacy/Architects Entrance ...
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Jun-10-2004
Reported in : RLW2005(3)Raj1700; 2005(1)WLC387
mathematics physics chemistry biological sciences economics engineering technology information systems finance and general studies through a single application form and the be considered as a university the provisions of the ugc act which are applicable to the university are applicable to the the state agency sixthly the provisions for poorer and backward sections of the society in unaided professional colleges are also to of the hon ble supreme court in w p no 317 of 1993 titled tma pai foundation v state of karnataka
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: Kasturi Finlease and Investment Ltd.
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Mar-12-2004
Reported in : [2004]53SCL133(Raj)
regional director northern region department of company affairs ministry of finance kanpur has not objected the petition the report of the proviso to sub section 2 of section 391 of the act 1956 the scheme of amalgamation of the transferor company in with the transferee company 3 this petition is filed under sections 391 and 394 of the companies act 1956 by the have been prepared and audited for the year ended march 31 2002 and the details have been given in para no
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT