Finance Act 1965 Section 31 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 1965 section 31 Court: rajasthan Year: 1978 Page 1 of about 266 results (0.347 seconds)Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Goswami Smt. Chandralata Bahuji
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Feb-22-1978
Reported in : [1980]125ITR700(Raj)
271 1 c of the act was added by the finance act 1964 w e f april 1 1966 in support applying the explanation to section 271 1 c of the act never arose on the totality of the evidence the tribunal approach a question of law arises parimisetti seetharamamma v cit 1965 57itr532 sc and cit v bharat tubewell stores 4 the 105itr193 orissa 2 after the insertion of the explanation to section 271 1 c in view of the presumption therein the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSatya NaraIn Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Feb-01-1978
Reported in : AIR1978Raj116; 1978(11)WLN55
the case carefully perused 8 section 70 b of the act reads as wider 70 b power of review by government with regard to the scope of the enquiry conducted under section 17 4 of the act and had no relevancy with
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKesari Mal Khatri Vs. the Municipal Board
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Aug-04-1978
Reported in : 1978WLN(UC)295
appellant to obtain permission under section 170 1 of the act i need not dilate on this aspect of the matter be well within the period of limitation as prescribed under section 271 2 of the act according to the learned counsel
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhikamchand Vs. Jugal Kishore and ors.
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Nov-08-1978
Reported in : 1978(11)WLN682
commencement of the amending under and in accordance with that act clause b fonevery such proceedings the court shall on the munsif dated jan 29 1977 the plaintiffs preferred appeal under section 22 of the act the learned additional district judge no the plaintiffs claimed rent from march 1 1975 to january 31 1976 rs 80 per month and damages for use and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJagannath Singh Vs. the State of Raj. and ors.
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Nov-11-1978
Reported in : 1978WLN(UC)350
appended to the effect that the amount recoverable by the finance department was still due the total amount payable to the a collector under part 2 of the public demands recovery act shall have to be performed by the collector himself they civil writ petition no 60 1963 decided on 22 2 1965 7 from the aforesaid decisions of this court it is conferred by the government on the sub divisional officer under section 26 would hold good for purpose of proceedings of recovery arjun sagar tank referred to above 2 by order dated 31st august 1959 the finance department of the government of rajasthan
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDevendra Singh Vs. Kalyan Singh
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Apr-28-1978
Reported in : AIR1978Raj134; 1978(11)WLN113
air 1957 pat 417 prem sagar chawla v security and finance p ltd air 1968 delhi 21 fb durga charan v 33 clearly and unmistakably points out that the indian arbitration act does not distinguish between an application for setting aside an of an arbitration agreement cannot come within the purview of section 30 of the act 8 on the other hand there it would be appropriate to make mention of sections 30 31 and 33 of the act they read as under 30
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHemraj Vs. Tax Recovery Officer and anr. (No. 2)
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Nov-02-1978
Reported in : [1979]118ITR744(Raj)
petitioner in view of the subsequent amendment made by the finance act no 13 of 1966 passed on may 13 1966 exclude the operation of section 6 of the general clauses act in the present case the liability to pay the annuity view of the amendment of section 156 and omission of sections 280k 280r and 280t with effect from april 1 1967
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJainaraIn Vs. Smt. Meena Devi
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Dec-21-1978
Reported in : 1978WLN(UC)473
in 1970 but written statement filed in 1977 after amendment act of 1975 came into force held provisions of section 13 arrears of rent and interest under the provisions of sub section 3 of section 13 within three months of the finding
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Smt. Satnam Malik
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Jan-23-1978
Reported in : [1979]120ITR309(Raj); 1978WLN(UC)24
to the extent of rs 21 000 from motor general finance co ltd with the guarantee of his father in law commissioner under section 271 1 c of the income tax act 1961 for concealment of income 10 there shall be no did the tribunal has completely over looked the explanation to section 271 1 c further more the tribunal based its conclusion
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrem Cables Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Collector (Principal Appraiser) Cu ...
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Sep-06-1978
Reported in : 1981(8)ELT440(Raj); 1978(11)WLN481
..... if we look into the proviso to section 26 1 of the finance act 1965 and subsequently incorporated in section 57 1 of the 1964 act and section 76 1 of the 1965 act these sections by their provisos clearly exempt the ..... the refund of the illegally collected amount should be granted to the petitioner 31 on consideration of the authorities referred to above and the circumstances of the case before .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT