Skip to content


Finance Act 1965 Section 31 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 1965 section 31 Court: madhya pradesh Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 355 results (0.717 seconds)
May 13 2004 (HC)

D.P. Agrawal Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-13-2004

Reported in : (2005)193CTR(MP)297; [2005]272ITR118(MP); 2004(3)MPLJ338

..... the assessee was an industrial company within the meaning of section 2 8 of the finance act 1975 and that in answering that question the high ..... court in sri om prakas gupta v commissioner of commercial taxes 1965 16 stc 935 what is necessary in order to characterise an ..... the activity in which the assessee s industrial undertaking is involved 31 in our opinion there is no nexus with the brass scrap .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 22 2004 (HC)

Smt. Shivkumari Dubey Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-22-2004

Reported in : [2005(105)FLR1144]; 2004(2)MPHT176; 2005(1)MPLJ274

dues be finalised within a reasonable period of time but action taken by the concerned department clearly reflects as inexcusable apathy the m p administrative tribunal in short the tribunal under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act 1985 for grant of down to the factum that though the petitioner retired on 31 3 1994 from the post of lady health inspector the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 16 2004 (HC)

Rajendra Tiwari Alias Raju, Advocate, Second Additional Govt. Prosecut ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-16-2004

Reported in : 2005(3)MPHT69; 2005(1)MPLJ204

of a public nature and the state is enjoined to act fairly reasonably and with advertence to the provisions of the 9 for the purpose of sub section 7 and sub section 8 the period during which a person has been in ann p 1 7 4557 04 yaduvanshmani pandey govt advocate 31 12 1995 18 10 2004 ann p 5 8 4558

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 29 2004 (HC)

Smt. Kunda Manolkar and ors. Vs. Jagdish Khandelwal and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-29-2004

Reported in : 2004(4)MPHT9; 2004(2)MPLJ457

recorded e election of a treasurer who shall keep the financial records and books of accounts f maintenance repair and replacement rooms bank cellars and for other machinery purposes thus neither act nor rules provided that basement can be used for construction 1 and 2 of code of civil procedure 1908 cpc section 16 2 of madhya pradesh prakoshtha swamitva adhiniyam 1976 rule

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 25 2004 (HC)

Gouri Shankar Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-25-2004

Reported in : 2004(2)MPHT301

in evidence in view of section 25 of the evidence act it is further argued that the circumstantial evidence against the 2002 7 scc 728 that the basic idea embedded in section 27 of the evidence act is the doctrine of confirmation

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 15 2004 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Shri Radhika Prakashan (Raipur) Priv ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-15-2004

Reported in : 2004(2)MPHT57

a on 28 1 1999 under section 88 of the finance act no 2 of 1998 under the kar vivad samadhan on 28 1 1999 under section 88 of the finance act no 2 of 1998 under the kar vivad samadhan scheme despite service 7 the assessee then moved an application under section 254 2 of income tax act before the tribunal the filed its return for the assessment year 1990 91 on 31 2 1990 declaring loss at rs 1 90 240 the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 25 2004 (HC)

Parbhudas Kishoredas Tobacco Products Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-25-2004

Reported in : (2009)20VST853(MP)

2000 as ultra vires sections 66 and 68 of the finance act of 1998 and ultra vires of articles 14 19 imposed levy of service tax on various services by finance act of 1994 provisions were made for levy collection and other the courts 6 it is averred in the petition that sections 116 and 117 of the finance act 2000 in so

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 13 2004 (HC)

Mainul Sheikh and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-13-2004

Reported in : 2005CriLJ2401

uncertain regard being had to the exclusionary fact in the finance act though a limited one it would exclude the manufacturing the meaning of clause f of section 2 central excise act 1944 in view of the definition contained in section 65 appellants for the offence punishable under section 395 read with section 397 ipc 10 the appellants abjured the guilt and pleaded by naib tahsildar t d singh as per ex p 31 8 after investigation a challan was filed against the appellants

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 24 2004 (HC)

Cit Vs. Vijaykumar Rajendrakumar and Co.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-24-2004

Reported in : [2005]142TAXMAN85(MP)

meaning of section 2 f of central excise act 1944 finance act 932 of 1994 section 65 76 b as amended process as defined under section 2 f of the 1944 act keeping in view the aforesaid dictionary clauses and circulars issued excise act 1944 in view of the definition contained in section 65 76b of the finance act especially keeping in view

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 04 2004 (HC)

Vimal C. Sodhani Vs. Parag Fans and Cooling System Ltd. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-04-2004

Reported in : [2006]133CompCas286(MP)

and presentability of the manufactured product section 65 76b of finance act used the words but it does not include thus under the provisions of section 2 f of central excise act 1944 as per the m p country spirits rules as is dismissed as being not properly filed 9 no costs section 2 f dipak misra k k lahoti rajendra menon jj

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //