Finance Act 1965 Section 31 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 1965 section 31 Court: rajasthan Year: 2007 Page 1 of about 337 results (0.4 seconds)Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Rajasthan Financial Corporation
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Oct-05-2007
Reported in : (2007)213CTR(Raj)184
itr 175 106 financial corporation engaged in providing long term finance for industrial or agricultural development in india or public companies manner laid down in the act chapter iii of the act refers to income which do not form part of total karnataka high court has tried to work out the sub section on the basis of a mathematical formula and has dissented
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDeputy Commissioner of Income-tax (Assessment) and anr. Vs. Rajasthan ...
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Nov-13-2007
Reported in : (2008)217CTR(Raj)191; [2008]299ITR253(Raj)
a i and ii which were inserted substituted by the finance act 1993 with retrospective effect from april 1 1989 the be no order as to costs head note income tax act 1961 assessment additional tax under section 143 1a constitutional validity sub section 2 of section 186 or section 250 or section 254 or section 260 or section 262 or section 263
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChoksi Heraeus Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State and ors.
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Nov-01-2007
Reported in : AIR2008Raj61; RLW2008(2)Raj1796
said judgment the provisions of section 20 3 of bengal finance sales tax act were found to be widely worded and of proviso to section 65 1 of the rajasthan stamp act 1998 hereinafter referred to as the act of 1998 is condition as exists in proviso to sub section 1 of section 65 of the act of 1998 is similar to sub the state government to issue an ordinance forthwith amending section 31 of the tamil nadu general sales tax act 1959 the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. Shri Mahesh Granites Pvt. Ltd.
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Dec-06-2007
Reported in : 2008[10]STR3
dated 2 7 2002 under the section 73 of the finance act 1994 which was challenged by the assessee on the in subsequent years having considered the relevant provisions of the act the tribunal has inter alia recorded the following conclusion the that the cases which are covered by the provision of section 71a cannot be covered by issuing notice under section 73
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRameshwar Soni Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Dec-17-2007
Reported in : (2008)214CTR(Raj)398; [2009]316ITR361(Raj)
of section 158bb of the act as inserted by the finance act 2002 w e f 1st july 1995 3 so annex 1 assessment was made under section 158bc of the act assessing a total undisclosed income of rs 12 19 481 was below taxable limit but for which no return under section 139 was filed since there was no obligation under the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLord Venketshwara Caterers Vs. Commercial Taxes Officer, Anti Evasion, ...
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Jul-30-2007
Reported in : (2007)10VST535(Raj)
of such income the word deliberately was omitted by the finance act 1964 with effect from april 1 1964 13 anwar canteen in factory premises even as per requirement of factories act and other labour legislation is a taxable event under the by the petitioner assessee to the extent of penalty under section 65 of the act was allowed by the learned deputy
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrem Chand and ors. Vs. Motichand and ors.
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Aug-31-2007
Reported in : RLW2008(1)Raj716
undoubtedly no limitation was prescribed either under the old limitation act 1908 or in the new limitation act 1963 the suit in execution almost all the cases dealt with in this section relate to the sale of a specific property or the make an application stop it further by referring to section 31 of the limitation act 1963 learned counsel urged that if
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPradeep Hinger Vs. State of Raj. and ors.
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Aug-16-2007
Reported in : RLW2008(1)Raj456
of the petitioner nor it is a matter of any financial irregularity or of a corruption but his alleged misconduct is popular verdict to be shown exit for a single innocuous action or error of decision 41 it is also required to the decision of the state government to proceed under sub section 2 of section 63 alone or it has some specific should not be brought about for political motives or consideration 31 in the judgment of this court given in the case
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJagram Vishnoi Vs. District Supply Officer and anr.
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Oct-25-2007
Reported in : 2008(1)WLN237
taking a decision to allot the fair price shop cannot act according to their whims and fancy it is true that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNayab Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Mar-30-2007
Reported in : RLW2007(3)Raj2077
own version thus immediately on asking by the mother the act of accused by inflicting axe blow on the head of to appreciate the evidence with regard to the charge under section 300 ipc 11 when the evidence is not sufficient to pw 14 satpal dudi the statement of accused under section 313 of the code of criminal procedure was recorded in which
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT