Finance Act 1965 Section 31 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 1965 section 31 Court: rajasthan Page 1 of about 590 results (0.801 seconds)Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Rooplal Danchand
Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : (1986)57CTR(Raj)79; [1986]162ITR742(Raj); 1986(2)WLN756
..... ending on march 31 1952 forgetting finance for the said excise shops he entered into a partnership with five others an application for registration of that firm under section 26a of the old act was filed ..... of the indian income tax act the firm should not be registered under section 26a of the act as the object of the firm was unlawful in mohapatra bhandar v cit 1965 58itr671 orissa one u .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGolcha Properties (P.) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : [1987]166ITR259(Raj)
..... an industrial company and was therefore entitled to concessional rates of income tax by the finance act 1965 the assessee claimed the benefit available to an industrial company under this provision on the ..... the provision giving benefit to a tenant and the rent paid for such premises section 31 of the act obviously is inapplicable because it relates to the amount spent on account of current .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRajasthan Financial Corporation Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : [1987]163ITR278(Raj)
..... said finance acts nor is it defined in the income tax act the provisions of the finance act 1964 and the finance act 1965 provide for rebate to a company and the term company is defined in section 2 ..... appeals were disposed of by the appellate assistant commissioner by a common order dated july 31 1968 before the appellate assistant commissioner it was submitted on behalf of the assessee that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNew Brightways School Samiti Vs. Rajasthan Housing Board and ors.
Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1998Raj183; 1997(2)WLC527; 1997(1)WLN551
or cloak for any extraneous consideration its every action and activity is subject to judicial review scrutiny and is liable to the enactment of the juvenile justice act 2000 that in section 2 k a juvenile or child was defined to mean
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Madho Singh and ors.
Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 2005ACJ1653; AIR2004Raj131
of pronouncements of hon ble the supreme court in haryana financial corporation s case air 2002 sc 834 and in delhi years before the accident the high court observed that the act did not contemplate a permanent driving licence because a driving 88 in mangi lal v sugan chand reported in air 1965 sc 101 it was held that a liberal construction must in para 6 on the other hand to read in section 13 2 i the provisions as suggested by shri nesargi license possessed by the driver since 1985 had expired on 31 5 95 and was subsequently renewed on 29 11 95
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMahaveer Enterprises Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : (1997)143CTR(Raj)252
sale of agricultural land the insertion of explanation by the finance act 1989 which was only clarificatory in nature could not the term for the purposes of the constitution and the act and the power to define comprehends in itself the power intention to bring it under cultivation at any time after 1965 66 and certainly not after they entered into the agreement b of sub cl iii of cl 14 of this section under s 2 14 of the it act we find
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTA.S. Construction Co. Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : [2001]252ITR182(Raj)
in view of the insertion of the proviso in the finance act to sub section 2 of section 44ad and giving view of the insertion of the proviso in the finance act to sub section 2 of section 44ad and giving it such a case will be scrutinised for regular assessment under section 143 3 32 2 the estimated income is comprehensive all in 1994 208 itr 8 in paras nos 31 to 31 7 at page 30 the meaning and scope of section
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGoswami and Brothers Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : [2001]250ITR359(Raj)
in view of the insertion of the proviso in the finance act to sub section 2 of section 44ad and giving view of the insertion of the proviso in the finance act to sub section 2 of section 44ad and giving it insertion of the proviso in the finance act to sub section 2 of section 44ad and giving it retrospective operation from 1994 208 itr 8 the following lines appearing in paras 31 3 and 32 2 of circular no 684 dated june
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPurshottamdass Bangur Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Rajasthan, Jaipu ...
Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1970Raj70; [1969]74ITR378(Raj); 1969()WLN83
clause a of subsection 3 of section 2 of the finance act of 1957 by applying the rate or rates applicable of section 2 1 a of the finance act 1957 act no 2 of 1957 he urged that simply because the determined only under clause a of sub section 3 of section 2 of the finance act of 1957 by applying the the relevant previous year is the financial year ending on 31st of march 1957 the assessee had various sources of income
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCwt Vs. Jodhana Real Estate Development Co. (P) Ltd.
Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : (2002)178CTR(Raj)305
thereafter by finance act 1960 the banking companies insurance companies finance companies shipping companies and registered companies under section 25 of of the levy of wealth tax under the wealth tax act in pursuance of the provisions of this section a section extracted as follows 3 the assets referred to in sub section 2 shall be the following namely i gold silver platinum of the assessee and against the department question nos 2 314 it is not in controversy that both the questions stand
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT