Factfinding - Judgment Search Results

Cit Vs. J.K. Synthetics Ltd.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [2004]140TAXMAN83(All)

..... favour of the assessee and against the department head note income tax reference question of factfinding of tribunal being a finding of factheld in the tribunal s appellate order a finding .....

Miller-el Vs. Cockrell

Court: US Supreme Court

..... batson violation but in a federal habeas case where a state court has previously entered factfindings that the six africanamerican jurors were not challenged because of their race petitioner must provide ..... federal habeas corpus proceeding 359 would not defer to state court determinations of fact if the factfinding procedure employed by the state court was not adequate to afford a full and fair .....

Virginia Vs. Black

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of course and in real world prosecutions there will always be further circumstances and the factfinder will always learn something more than the isolated fact of cross burning sometimes those circumstances ..... what is significant is not that the provision 386 opinion of souter j permits a factfinder s conclusion that the defendant acted with proscribable and punishable intent without any further .....

Desert Palace, Inc. Vs. Costa

Court: US Supreme Court

..... in judgment this showing triggered the deterrent purpose of the statute and permitted a reasonable factfinder to conclude that absent further explanation the employer s discriminatory motivation caused the employment decision .....

C. Ramaiah Reddy Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT

Reported in: (2003)87ITD439(Bang.)

..... by insertion of expln 2 in section 158be the amendment narrows down the scope of factfinding as to the execution of the warrant of search to ascertaining the date of conclusion .....

Washington State Dept. of Social and Health Servs. Vs. Guardianship Es ...

Court: US Supreme Court

..... appeals which certified the case to the supreme court of washington after remanding for further factfinding the state supreme court affirmed the trial court s holding that the department s practices .....

Demore Vs. Kim

Court: US Supreme Court

..... that determination addington supra at 427 requiring a heightened burden of proof to impress the factfinder with the importance of the decision and thereby perhaps to reduce the chances that inappropriate .....

illinois Ex Rel. Madigan Vs. Telemarketing Associates, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... s law even where a prima facie showing of unreasonableness ha d been rebutted the factfinder still had to make an ultimate determination on a case by case basis as to .....

Wiggins Vs. Smith

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 73 665 a 2d at 244 this relaxed standard the court observed would provide the factfinder with the opportunity to consider any aspect of a defendant s character or record that .....

Shiv Parshad Pandey Vs. C.B.i. Through Director, New Delhi

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2003(51)BLJR934; 2003CriLJ1710; JT2003(2)SC413; 2003(2)SCALE658; (2003)11SCC508; 2003(1)LC640(SC)

..... on the complaint of assasingh and what was done was only to hold a preliminary factfinding exercise hence the argument of the appellant that therewas a trial and a punishment under .....