Factfinding - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: factfinding Year: 1981 Page 1 of about 24 results (0.004 seconds)Harris Vs. Rivera
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-14-1981
..... rule should be applied to cases in which a judge is the factfinder although dunn and dotterweich preclude a holding that inconsistency in a ..... presume that they follow their own instructions when they are acting as factfinders we are not persuaded that an page 454 u s 347 ..... does not require scrutiny of the reasoning process actually used by the factfinder if known jackson v virginia 443 u s at 443 u .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSumner Vs. Mata
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-21-1981
..... of the factual dispute were not resolved in the state court hearing 2 that the factfinding procedure employed by the state court was not adequate to afford a full and fair ..... concept is embodied in the due process clause and in the realm of factfinding is to instruct the factfinder concerning the degree of confidence our society thinks he should have in the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMaryland Vs. Louisiana
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-26-1981
..... or reject recommendations when this court is in theory the primary factfinder as chief justice stone put it in georgia v pennsylvania r ..... an appellate tribunal ill equipped for the task of factfinding and so forced in original jurisdiction cases awkwardly to play the ..... role of factfinder without actually presiding over the introduction of evidence ohio v .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMinnesota Vs. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-21-1981
..... evidence in sharp conflict app a 25 nevertheless finding itself as factfinder obliged to weigh and evaluate this evidence ibid the court ..... has no basis for inferring a rejection of the quite specific factfindings by the trial court the court s decision today holding ..... considered by the legislature however the trial court found that as factfinder it was obliged to weigh and evaluate this evidence much .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFirst Nat'l Maintenance Corp. Vs. NLRB
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-22-1981
..... enforce without a remand to the board for further examination of the evidence and proper factfinding nlrb v pipefitters 429 u s 507 429 u s 522 n 9 1977 sec ..... must be weighed and it had remanded the case before it to the board for factfinding into the circumstances behind the partial closing see also equitable gas co v nlrb 637 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCalifornia Ex Rel. Cooper Vs. Mitchell Bros. theater
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-30-1981
..... 93 1981 we reverse the purpose of a standard of proof is to instruct the factfinder concerning the degree of confidence our society page 454 u s 93 thinks he should ..... standard c mccormick evidence 320 p 679 1954 see also kaplan decision theory and the factfinding process 20 stan l rev 1065 1072 1968 justice brennan with whom justice marshall joins .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSteadman Vs. Sec
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-25-1981
..... a commission proceeding involving allegations of fraud demand that his burden of risk of erroneous factfinding should be reduced by requiring the commission to prove violations of the antifraud provisions of ..... 242 b 4 was viewed by the court as representing a yardstick for the administrative factfinder the court concluded that the provision was directed at the quality of evidence upon which .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSpaziano Vs. Florida
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1981
..... jurors a less drastic alternative may be constitutionally necessary to enhance or preserve their essential factfinding function whether the trial court properly may enter a judgment of guilt should the jury ..... for a lesser included offense seems to me a separate legal matter with which the factfinder need have no concern id at 908 footnote omitted in at least one respect this .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSchweiker Vs. Gray Panthers
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-25-1981
..... formula is not inherently arbitrary to require individual factual determinations of need would dissipate in factfinding resources that could have been spent on the needy pp 453 u s 47 48 ..... limited resources to spend on welfare to require individual determinations of need would mandate costly factfinding procedures that would dissipate resources that could have been spent on the needy id at .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBarrentine Vs. Arkansas-best Freight Sys.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-06-1981
..... factories than shop stewards business agents managerial supervisors and the traditional ad hoc panels of factfinders see e g steelworkers page 450 u s 748 v warrior gulf navigation co supra .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial