Factfinding - Judgment Search Results

Ring Vs. Arizona

Court: US Supreme Court

..... turn on the relative rationality fairness or efficiency of potential factfinders apprendi 530 u s at 498 scalia j concurring ..... turn on the relative rationality fairness or efficiency of potential factfinders entrusting to a judge the finding of facts necessary to ..... other than arizona only four states commit both capital sentencing factfinding and the ultimate sentencing decision entirely to judges see .....

Harris Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... implemented measures regulating judicial discretion these systems maintained the statutory ranges and the judge s factfinding role but assigned a uniform weight to factors judges often relied upon when choosing ..... of the fourteenth amendment and the jury guarantee of the sixth m ay judicial factfinding by a preponderance support the application of a provision that increases the potential severity .....

Bell Vs. Cone

Court: US Supreme Court

..... s 853 862 1975 in a criminal trial which is in the end basically a factfinding process no aspect of such advocacy could be more important than the opportunity finally to .....

Abdur'Rahman Vs. Bell

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of constitutional law and may not establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have found the applicant guilty of the underlying offense 28 u s c 2244 .....

United States Vs. Vonn

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the record at the time the plea was entered was an evidentiary hearing for further factfinding by the trial court here however there is a third source of information outside the .....

Sattazahn Vs. Pennsylvania

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of murder plus aggravating circumstance s thus rumsey was correct to focus on whether a factfinder had made findings that constituted an acquittal of the aggravating circumstances but the reason that .....

Gannon Dunkerley and Co. Ltd., Vs. Union of India (Uoi),

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2003(5)BomCR445; 2003(90)ECC293; 2003LC143(Bombay); 2003(156)ELT467(Bom); 2003(3)MhLj645; [2004]135STC168(Bom)

..... four items were in question and came to theconclusion that without any further evidence or factfinding being necessary ex facie they were not excisableto the excise duty if that was the .....

Neha JaIn Vs. University of Delhi and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2002IIIAD(Delhi)75; AIR2002Delhi403; 97(2002)DLT239

..... the court observed as under the disciplinary authority and on appeal the appellate authority being factfinding authorities have exclusive power to consider the evidence with a view to maintain discipline they .....