Factfinding - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: factfinding Page 1 of about 300 results (0.009 seconds)Santosky Vs. Kramer
Court: US Supreme Court
..... at such a proceeding numerous factors combine to magnify the risk of erroneous factfinding permanent neglect proceedings employ imprecise substantive standards that leave determinations unusually open ..... rights termination hearings like civil commitment hearings termination proceedings often require the factfinder to evaluate medical and psychiatric testimony and to decide issues difficult to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Vs. Booker
Court: US Supreme Court
..... the government argues that in any case in which the constitution prohibits the judicial factfinding procedures that congress and the commission contemplated for implementing the guidelines the guidelines ..... of these various guidelines provisions demonstrates the fallacy in the assumption that judicial factfinding can never be constitutional under the guidelines the majority s answer to the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSchall Vs. Martin
Court: US Supreme Court
..... detention the remaining question is whether the procedures afforded juveniles detained prior to factfinding provide sufficient protection against erroneous and unnecessary deprivations of liberty see mathews v ..... of the predictably recurring happenstance that however expeditiously an appeal might be prosecuted factfinding and dispositional hearings normally will have been held and a disposition made .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJackson Vs. Virginia
Court: US Supreme Court
..... victim her body was found partially unclothed from these uncontradicted circumstances a rational factfinder readily could have inferred beyond a reasonable doubt that the petitioner notwithstanding ..... instructions they receive before retiring to reach a verdict and therefore that either factfinder will itself provide the necessary bulwark against erroneous factual determinations to presume otherwise .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCabana Vs. Bullock
Court: US Supreme Court
..... rested their approval of the capital sentencing schemes before them on the combination of channeled factfinding by the sentencer and appellate review in gregg an important additional safeguard was provided ..... the latter question because it assumes that the appellate court is constitutionally a proper factfinder in mata this court explicitly acknowledged that the trial court record on which the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSt. Mary's Honor Center Vs. Hicks
Court: US Supreme Court
..... impose liability upon an employer for alleged discriminatory employment practices unless the factfinder determines that the employer has unlawfully discriminated nor may the court substitute ..... impose liability upon an employer for alleged discriminatory employment practices unless an appropriate factfinder determines according to proper procedures that the employer has unlawfully discriminated we .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDickinson Vs. Zurko
Court: US Supreme Court
..... the ap a requires meaningful review and its enactment meant stricter judicial review of agency factfinding than congress believed some courts had previously conducted ibid the upshot in terms of ..... 165 finally the circuit reasons that its stricter court court review will produce better agency factfinding it says that the standard encourages the creation of administrative records that more fully .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCalifornia Vs. Green
Court: US Supreme Court
..... basis while the witness stands face to face with the accused and the factfinder if the factfinder decides that the witness is honestly unable to remember the events in question ..... that incriminating pretrial testimony is unreliable its admission absent confrontation will prejudicially distort the factfinding process the reliability of pretrial testimony in turn is not determined simply by the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAtlas Roofing Co., Inc. Vs. Occupational Safety Comm'n
Court: US Supreme Court
..... no basis for now interpreting it as providing an impenetrable barrier to administrative factfinding under otherwise valid federal regulatory statutes the amendment did not render congress powerless ..... the amendment should now be interpreted to provide an impenetrable barrier to administrative factfinding under otherwise valid federal regulatory statutes we cannot conclude that the amendment rendered .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCunningham Vs. California
Court: US Supreme Court
..... california courts have not read this language to unmoor circumstances in aggravation from any factfinding anchor in line with the rules the california supreme court has repeatedly referred ..... we examined the sixth amendment s historical and doctrinal foundations and recognized that judicial factfinding operating to increase a defendant s otherwise maximum punishment posed a grave constitutional .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial