Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Year: 1973 Page 79 of about 961 results (0.146 seconds)

Four Bhai Private Ltd. Vs. Walaiti Ram and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1973Delhi891

..... may like-wise shift again to the plaintiff. he may also rely upon presumptions of fact, for instance those mentioned in section 114 and other sections of the evidence act. under section 114 of the evidence act, 'the court may presume the existence of any fact which it thinks likely to have happened, regard being had to ..... the decrees.(49) turning to the second aspect i find that the court below had drawn presumptions under section 114 of the evidence act and section 118 clauses (a) and (g) of the act. section 114 of the evidence act should have been taken into consideration in respect of the nobproduction of the accounts by respondent no. 1 to ..... it has been accepted, indorsed, negotiated or transferred, was accepted, indorsed, negotiated or transferred for consideration.(51) to find the true scope of section 118(a) section 14 of the act which deals with negotiation has essentially to be looked into. unless the negotiable instrument is shown to have been transferred so as to constitute the .....

South India Viscose Ltd. Vs. Textiles Committee and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1973]91ITR595(Mad)

..... the pay and allowances of the officers and other employees of the committee and other administrative expenses of the committee, (b) carrying out the purposes of this act. section 11 provides for the committee to direct an officer specially authorised in that behalf to examine the quality of textiles or the suitability of textile machinery for use ..... view. the textiles fund has other sources of contribution and the money in the fund is available for carrying out the purposes of the act.(section 7(2)(b) of the act). the expenses for any other service which the committee may render to the manufacturers of textiles and textile machinery other than the levy of ..... pay and allowances of the officers and other employees of the committee and other administrative expenses of the committee;(b) carrying out the purposes of this act.4. section 11 authorises the committee to direct an officer specially authorised in that behalf to examine the quality of textiles or the suitability of textile machinery for .....

Nanavati and Co. (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. R.C. Dutt and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1975]45CompCas91(Bom)

..... 72. even though we have quoted the above meaning of the word 'abrogation', we are not called upon in this litigation to decide whether the authority acting under sub-section (5) of section 294 has a right to annul, or to do away with, or abolish, the appointment of a sole selling agent altogether. we are only called ..... been entered into by the two willing parties which has been ratified by the general body of the shareholders. 18. however, provisions of sub-section (5) of section 294 of the act appear to give uncontrolled and uncanalised powers to interfere with such contracts and to vary them. for doing this there are no norms indicated, nor ..... , the petitioners have raised four points to challenge the order of the company law board. according to the appellant-company, the provisions of sub-section (5) of section 294 of the act are discriminatory and violative of the principles of article 14 of the constitution of india. according to them, arbitrary and uncanalised powers have been vested .....

Dilip Construction Company Vs. Hindustan Steel Ltd.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1973MP261

..... 16th edition, 320' when the respondent was not willing to join in the submission, the remedy of the appellant lay by way of an application under section 20 of the arbitration act. we are fortified in that view by the decision of the supreme court in thawardas pherumal v. union of india, air 1955 sc 468. while ..... before the arbitrators, the respondent reiterated that the the reference to arbitration was premature. once again, in, the court below, the respondent while applying under section 30 of the arbitration act for setting aside the award, had specifically alleged in para 5 of the application that 'there was no dispute or difference as contemplated by clause 61 ..... , the supreme court has observed:'but what confers jurisdiction on the arbitrators to hear and decide a dispute is an arbitration agreement as defined in section 2(a) of the arbitration act, and where there isno such agreement, there is an initial want of jurisdiction which cannot be cured by acquiescence. it may also be mentioned .....

Ajudhia Textile Mills Ltd., Delhi Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 10(1974)DLT52

..... of power. the said provision was given effect to by the addition of entry no. 18-a to the first schedule to the central excise and salt act, 1934, (herein to be called 'the act') the petitioners, however, contend that at the time of discussion of the bill in parliament the then finance minister in his speech on the budget proposal of .....

Velappa Gounder Vs. Nachimuthu Gounder and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1973Mad449; (1973)1MLJ465

..... district court and not before this court. since there was a genuine doubt as to whether the appeal has to be preferred in this court as per section 54 of the land acquisition act or not the appellant has preferred the appeal in this court and has taken time for having the matter decided as to whether the appeal can be entertained ..... only if the decision arises out of an award or any part of an award. but in this case, the reference made to the court is one under section 30 of the land acquisition act for apportioning the compensation amount, when the same was disputed by the various parties. as per the decision in : air1965mad376 , referred to above there is no ..... contention that a civil revision petition lies held that only an appeal lies against an order of a court rejecting a reference made by the collector under sections 18 and 31 of the land acquisition act. but as regards the question whether the same can be construed as an aware, the bench has simply stated that if it is not an aware .....

John Manjooran Vs. C.M. Stephen and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 1973CriLJ1722

..... if a witness h not examined in full in chief and also allowed to be cross-examined, that evidence cannot be considered except in the circumstances mentioned in section 33 of the evidence act. the observation in phani bhusan v. sibakali basu. : air1952cal218 is to the effect thatunless examination of a witness is complete, that is to say. unless he has been ..... -examined or unless his cross-examination or re-examination has been declined, his evidence cannot be considered except, in the circumstances mentioned in section 33 of the evidence act.here there is no case that section 33 of the evidence act comes into play. i, therefore, find no merit in the contention raised by the learned counsel for the appellant, apart from the fact .....

Brennan Vs. Arnheim and Neely, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... 250,000 (exclusive of excise taxes at the retail level which are separately stated). . . ." 29 u.s.c. 203 (s). [ footnote 2 ] section 3(s)(3) of the act, as enacted in 1961, referred in its definition of "[e]nterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce," inter alia, to: " ..... building owners, in their capacity as employers, [ footnote 5 ] are to be aggregated to create some abstract "enterprise" for purposes of the fair labor standards act. [ footnote 6 ] it is argued that such a straightforward application of the statutory criteria to the respondent's business ignores the significance of the dollar volume ..... purchasing pools, franchises, and leases of business premises from large page 410 u. s. 518 commercial landlords do not create "enterprises" within the meaning of the act. ibid. the district court correctly identified the three main elements of the statutory definition of "enterprise": related activities, unified operation or common control, and common business .....

S. Kannan and ors. Vs. the All India Sai Satnaj (Registered) by Its Pr ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1974)1MLJ174

..... charitable endowment within the scope of section 3 of the act. the learned advocate-general pointed out that normally no hindu would contemplate exclusion of members of other communities from. the benefit of the ..... that who the beneficiaries of the trust are is not determinative of the question what constitutes a hindu public charitable endowment for purposes of section 3 of the act.the learned advocate-general submitted that anomalous results might follow if the test of exclusiveness were adopted in determining what constitutes a hindu public ..... word 'exclusively'' is not added, to the words 'hindu public religious institutions and endowments' or in the definition of the word 'temple' in section 6 (20) of the act. the following passage in the judgment of balakrishna ayyar, j., may be usefully extracted in this connection :--i would draw attention to the words ' .....

Braden Vs. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of Kentucky

Court : US Supreme Court

..... . within their respective jurisdictions " (emphasis supplied), precluded the district court from page 410 u. s. 486 entertaining petitioner's application. the district court held that the section did not bar its determination of the application. the court held further that petitioner had been denied a speedy trial, and ordered respondent either to secure his presence in kentucky ..... island, new york, pending deportation sought habeas corpus on the principal ground that the removal orders exceeded the president's statutory authority under the alien enemy act of 1798. page 410 u. s. 496 they filed their petitions in the district court for the district of columbia, naming as respondent the attorney ..... u.s.c. 2255; s.rep. no. 1502, 89th cong., 2d sess., 2 (1966), discussing 28 u.s.c. 2241(d); uniform post-conviction procedure act 3; american bar association project on standards for criminal justice, post-conviction remedies 1.4, p. 28 (approved draft 1968); note, developments in the law -- federal .....