Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Court: supreme court of india Year: 1973 Page 1 of about 145 results (0.437 seconds)

Sep 18 1973 (SC)

Giani Bakshish Singh Vs. Government of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-18-1973

Reported in : AIR1973SC2667; 1973CriLJ1801; (1973)2SCC688; [1974]1SCR662; 1973(5)LC814(SC)

..... them to organise the movement in a systematic manner, raising volunteers and setting offices at suitable places in punjab. you further directed them to collect arms, explosives etc. for use for the achievement of the object at the proper time. you further instigated them to create hatred amongst hindus and sikhs and cause communal ..... makers in their wisdom have provided for it. it is not necessary to give further examples to show that prejudicial activities contemplated under section 3(1) of the maintenance of internal security act are not necessarily activities prohibited or made punishable by a specific provision of law. the cases relied upon to support the contrary proposition ..... detention is not a punishment for an offence. to accept the argument on behalf of the appellant would make the grounds given in section 3(1) of the maintenance of internal security act meaningless. take for instance action prejudicial to the relations of india with foreign powers. as far as we are aware, there is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 23 1973 (SC)

Khasbaba Maruti Sholke Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-23-1973

Reported in : AIR1973SC2474; (1973)2SCC449; [1974]1SCR266

..... /34 and 333/34 indian penal code, section 25 of arms act read with section 34 indian penal code, section 27 arms act read with section 34 indian penal code, section 3 explosive substances act read with section 34 indian penal code, section 4 explosive substances act read with section 34 indian penal code, section 5 explosive substances act read with section 34 indian penal code and section 6 explosive substances act read with section 34 indian penal code. in the alternative ..... , there were charges against the accused for the above offences read with section .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 19 1973 (SC)

Sambhu Nath Sarkar Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-19-1973

Reported in : AIR1973SC1425; (1973)1SCC856; [1974]1SCR1

..... commit, any offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life or imprisonment for a term extending to seven years or more or any offence under the arms act, 1959 or the explosive substances act, 1908, where the commission of such offence disturbs, or is likely to disturb, public order; or(e) in the case of a person referred to ..... where a foreigner enters or attempts to enter india or is found with arms, ammunition or explosives, or where a foreigner enters or attempts to enter a notified area or is found therein in breach of section 3 of the criminal law amendment act, 1961, or where such a foreigner enters or attempts to enter in an area adjoining the ..... in clauses (a) to (f) of section 110 of the crpc, 1898, committing any offence punishable with imprisonment where the commission of such offence disturbs, or is likely to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 21 1973 (SC)

Hukumdev NaraIn Yadav Vs. Lalit NaraIn Mishra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-21-1973

Reported in : AIR1974SC480; (1974)2SCC133; [1974]3SCR31

..... the former. where once the special or local law has provided a period different from that prescribed in the schedule to the limitation act, sub-section (2) of section 29 stands directly attracted and section 3 and other section shall apply in so far as, and to the extent to which, they are not expressly excluded by such special or local ..... to which the first limb does not apply. sinha, c.j., rajagopala ayyangar and raghubar dayal, jj., by majority held that the entire sub-section (2) of section 29 of the limitation act has to be read as an integrated provision and the conjunction 'and' connects the two parts and makes it necessary for attracting clause (a) that ..... high court. an appeal being a creature of a statute, the rights conferred on the appellant must be found within the four corners of the act. sub-section (2) of the present section 116a expressly gives this court the discretion and authority to entertain an appeal after the expiry of the period of thirty days. no right is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 21 1973 (SC)

Gwalior Rayon Silk Mfg. (Wvg.) Co. Ltd. Vs. the Asstt. Commissioner of ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-21-1973

Reported in : AIR1974SC1660; [1974]94ITR204(SC); (1974)4SCC98; [1974]2SCR879; [1974]33STC219(SC)

..... appropriate state legislature in respect of local sales. it may be noted that in so far as inter-state sales are concerned, the central sales tax act, by section 9(2) has adopted the law of the appropriate state as regards the procedure for levy and collection of the tax as also for imposition of penalties ..... to, sikri, j. (as he then was), in his concurring judgment took the view that there was 'adequate guide or policy in the expression 'purposes of the act' in section 113' but that it was not necessary to rely on the safeguards mentioned by wanchoo, c.j. in his judgment to sustain the delegation. he said :this ..... although each way delegate to subordinate agencies : and to permit through delegation alteration of the distribution of legislative power established by the british north america act (save as permitted by section 94) would mean that matters within dominion competence would be incorporated in legislation assented to by the lieutenant-governor instead of by the governor-general, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 21 1973 (SC)

State of Tamil Nadu and ors. Vs. Sitolakshmi Mills and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-21-1973

Reported in : AIR1974SC1505; (1974)4SCC408; [1974]3SCR1; [1974]33STC200(SC)

..... commercial tax officer 20 s.t.c. 150, the high court of madras held that sub-sections (2), (2a) and (5) of section 8 of the act were bad for the reason that they violated the provisions of articles 301 and 303(1) of the constitution this was on the basis that the ..... common judgment. these appeals are preferred against the judgment on the basis of certificates granted by the high court and they raise the common question, namely, whether section 8(2)(b) of the act is bad for the reason that the provisions thereof offend articles 301 and 303(1) of the constitution.2. in larsen and toubro ltd. v. joint ..... before the high court of madras, the respondents claimed that they were not liable to be taxed at the higher rate prescribed in section 8(2)(b) of 'the central sales tax act, 1956 (hereinafter called the act) on the turnover of their sales in the course of inter-state trade to government or unregistered dealers even though they had not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 21 1973 (SC)

State of Tamil Nadu, Etc. Vs. Sitalakshmi Mills, Etc. (Civil Appeal No ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-21-1973

Reported in : (1974)3CTR(SC)59

..... -(a) sells to the government any goods; or(b) sells to a registered dealer other than the government goods of the description referred to in sub-section;shall be liable to pay tax under this act, which shall be three per cent of his turnover.(2) the tax payable by any dealer on his turnover in so far as the turnover or ..... 303(1) of the constitution.2. in larsen and toubro ltd. vs. joint commercial tax officer (1), the high court of madras held that sub-sections (2), (2a) and (5) of s. 8 of the act were bad for the reason that they violated the provisions of articles 301 and 303(1) of the constitution. this was on the basis that the ..... registration of dealers, fixing rates of tax and for levy and collection of tax and for imposing penalties for breach of the provisions of the act relating to levy and collection of inter-state sales tax. by sec. 5, every dealer was made liable to pay tax on all sales effected by him in the course of inter-state trade or commerce .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 1973 (SC)

Fagu Shaw and ors. Vs. the State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-20-1973

Reported in : AIR1974SC613; 1974CriLJ486; (1974)4SCC152; [1974]2SCR832

..... the proclamation of emergency and for a period of six months thereafter. section 2(g) of that act defines "proclamation of emergency" as the proclamation issued under clause (1) of article 352 of the constitution on the 3rd day of december, 1971. the president ..... shall be twelve months from the date of detention or until the expiry of the defence of india act, 1971 whichever is latter". sec 1(3) of the defence of india act, 1971 laid down the duration of that act and said that act shall remain in force for the duration of the proclamation of emergency and a period of six months ..... be twelve months from the date of detention or until the expiry of the defence of india act, 1971, whichever is later." the defence of india act, 1971, came into force on december 4, 1971. section 1(3) of that act provides that the act shall come into force at once and shall remain in force during the period of operation of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 1973 (SC)

Sri Chand Batra Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-19-1973

Reported in : AIR1974SC639; 1974CriLJ590; (1974)4SCC247; [1974]2SCR821; 1974(6)LC149(SC)

..... under consideration was not questioned at all. we, therefore, think that this particular excise inspector could be treated as an expert within the meaning of section 45 of the evidence act. the excise inspector had, in addition to employing the smelling test, used all the other tests he could reasonably adopt. if his competence to give ..... before us is whether the excise inspector, whose evidence was under consideration, had sufficient knowledge to be deemed to be an expert within the meaning of section 45 of the evidence act so that the tests adopted by him, together with all the attendant circumstances, could establish beyond doubt that the appellant was in possession of illicit liquor ..... circular road, meerut cantonment, from where the recovery was made, was taken after the issue of a regular search warrant (ex. ka. 1) under section 52 of the u.p. excise act, 1910, by a first class magistrate on 26-10-1967. the very detailed recovery memo (exhibit ka. 2) dated 27-10-1967 was signed by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 1973 (FN)

Nlrb Vs. Savair Mfg. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Dec-17-1973

..... (b). there is no explicit provision which makes "interference" by a union with the right of an employee to "refrain" from union activities an unfair labor practice. section 8(c), however, provides: "the expressing of any views, argument, or opinion, or the dissemination thereof, whether, in written, printed, graphic, or visual form ..... with such regulations as may be prescribed by the board --" "(a) by an employee or group of employees or any individual or labor organization acting in their behalf alleging that a substantial number of employees (i) wish to be represented for collective bargaining and that their employer declines to recognize their ..... conducted an election by secret ballot among the production and maintenance employees of respondent at the request of the mechanics educational society of america (hereafter union). under the act, [ footnote 2 ] the union, if it wins the election, becomes "the exclusive representative of all the employees" in that particular unit for purposes of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //