Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Court: us supreme court Year: 1973 Page 1 of about 102 results (0.219 seconds)

Nlrb Vs. Savair Mfg. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... (b). there is no explicit provision which makes "interference" by a union with the right of an employee to "refrain" from union activities an unfair labor practice. section 8(c), however, provides: "the expressing of any views, argument, or opinion, or the dissemination thereof, whether, in written, printed, graphic, or visual form ..... with such regulations as may be prescribed by the board --" "(a) by an employee or group of employees or any individual or labor organization acting in their behalf alleging that a substantial number of employees (i) wish to be represented for collective bargaining and that their employer declines to recognize their ..... conducted an election by secret ballot among the production and maintenance employees of respondent at the request of the mechanics educational society of america (hereafter union). under the act, [ footnote 2 ] the union, if it wins the election, becomes "the exclusive representative of all the employees" in that particular unit for purposes of .....

Raval and Co. Vs. K.G. Ramachandran and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1974SC818; (1974)1SCC424; [1974]2SCR629

..... - payment of rent." 'similarly in shri hem chand v. shrimati sham devi (ilr 1955 punj 36) which dealt with the delhi and ajmer merwara rent control act, section 13(i) of which provided that no decree or order for the recovery of possession of any premises shall be passed by any court in favour of the landlord ..... division bench respectively. before we go further into a discussion of the questions that arise :it is necessary to look into certain relevant provisions of the act. clause (6) of section 2 of the act defines landlord thus : "landlord" includes the person who is receiving or is entitled to receive the rent of a building, whether on his own ..... raj krishna v. s.k. shaw bros. (1951 scr 145) dealing with the bihar buildings (lease, rent and eviction) control act, 1947 and interpreting section 11 of that act this court observed as follows : '.'section 11 begins with the words 'notwithstanding anything contained in any agreement or law to the,contrary', and hence any attempt to import the .....

Golden State Bottling Co., Inc. Vs. Nlrb

Court : US Supreme Court

..... outset whether the issuance of a reinstatement and backpay order against a bona fide successor exceeds the board's remedial powers under 10(c) of the act, 29 u.s.c. 160(c). section 10(c), in pertinent part, provides: "if upon the preponderance of the testimony taken, the board shall be of the opinion that any ..... , who had not perpetrated the unfair labor practice. in perma vinyl, however, the board found a broader authority in the words of the section authorizing the board "to take such affirmative action . . . as will effectuate the policies of this act." these words were construed as granting "broad administrative power . . . to frame such remedial orders . . . not, of course, ..... bona fide purchase is an unfair labor practice, but because the board is obligated to effectuate the policies of the act. construing 10(c) thus to grant the board remedial power to issue such orders results in a reading of the section, as it should be read, in the light of " the provisions of the whole law, and . . .....

Falk Vs. Brennan

Court : US Supreme Court

..... f's gross receipts must include amounts paid by the building owner to cover operation and maintenance costs, plus the amount paid as commissions. [ footnote 2/1 ] section 3(r) of the act, 29 u.s.c. 203(r), defines "enterprise" to mean: "the related activities performed (either through unified operation or common control) by any person or ..... with respect to calculating the annual dollar volume of sales in retail and service establishments, and in laundries under the exemptions provided in section 13(a)(2), (3), (4), and (13) of the act. the procedure for making the calculation is set forth in the department's interpretative bulletin [pertaining to retailers of goods and services]. ..... in commerce," 75 stat. 67, 69. but not every enterprise meeting the statutory definition in 3(r) of the act was brought within the act's coverage. section 3(s)(1) prescribed a dollar volume test that limited the act's coverage to those enterprises that had an "annual gross volume of sales of . . . not less than $1 .....

Foley Vs. Blair and Co., Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... issue in the first instance. in reviewing the question of mootness, the court of appeals should consider the effect of 64a(1) of the act, 11 u.s.c. 104(a)(1). inter alia, that section provides that "one reasonable attorney's fee" for the services rendered to page 414 u. s. 217 petitioning creditors in involuntary cases shall be ..... court for the southern district of new york. inter alia, the petition alleged that the appointment of the liquidator constituted an act of bankruptcy under 3a(5) of the bankruptcy act, 11 u.s.c. 21(a)(5). that section makes it an act of bankruptcy if any person, "(5) while insolvent or unable to pay his debts as they mature, procured, permitted ..... treated as a priority debt in bankruptcy proceedings, payable out of the estate in advance of distribution of any dividends to creditors. section 64 is made applicable to 321 chapter xi proceedings by 302 of the act, 11 u.s.c. 702, and thus might allow the treatment of at least some of the petitioners' counsel fees as a .....

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc. Vs. Ware

Court : US Supreme Court

..... -136. (b) rule 347(b) cannot be categorized as part of a need for uniform national regulation, there being no revelation in the act or in any sec regulation that nationwide uniformity of an exchange's housekeeping affairs is necessary, and it not being shown that national uniformity in the area of wage claims ..... placed in focus with the "historical friendliness of california to the institution of arbitration." feldman, arbitration modernized -- the new california arbitration act, 34 so.calif.l.rev. 413, 414 (1961). section 229 thus survived subsequent legislative scrutiny and has now manifested page 414 u. s. 133 itself as an important state policy through ..... of the securities commission . . . of any state . . . insofar as it does not conflict with the provisions" of the act "or the rules and regulations thereunder." section 28(b), 15 u.s.c. 78bb(b), provides that nothing in the act "shall be construed to modify existing law . . . with regard to the binding effect . . . of [exchange] action .....

Ch. Khazan Singh and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1974SC669; (1974)1SCC295; [1974]2SCR562; 1974(6)LC85(SC)

..... the parliament under entry no. 21 read with entry no. 35 of the concurrent list.a scheme approved by the state government under sub-section (3) of section 68d of the act effectuates the object of state monopoly in the matter of transport service. such a scheme, in our opinion, does not entail encroachment by ..... operators, including the appellants, issued by the regional transport authority, jaipur and countersigned by the regional transport authortiy, agra were cancelled under sub-section (2) of section 68f of the act.3. the appellants, who are bus operators of rajasthan, and some others thereupon filed petitions under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution to ..... the hearing authority, as per order dated july 30, 1962. the central government conveyed its approval to the scheme under the proviso to sub-section (3) of section 68d of the act as per letter dated february 6, 1963. notification dated february 20, 1963 was published by the uttar pradesh government in the official gazette dated .....

Nagindas Ramdas Vs. Dalpatram Ichharam Alias Brijram and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1974SC471; (1974)1SCC242; [1974]2SCR544

..... compromise agreement, itself. admissions, if true and clear, are by far the best proof of the facts admitted. admissions in pleadings or judicial admissions, admissible under section 58 of the evidence act, made by the parties or their agents at or before the hearing of the case, stand on a higher footing than evidentiary admissions. the former class of ..... of the decree, but accepted the other objection holding that the decree was void because 'the court did not apply its mind while allowing it under section 13(1)(j), rent act'. with regard to the second ground it was said that it had ceased to exist because 'under the terms of compromise the default in payment of ..... that this memo of compromise is executable as a decree of court.25. the court, after referring to the petition of the landlord being under section 10(3)(a)(i), of the act on the ground of his own occupation, passed the following order :compromise memo filed and recorded. by consent eviction is ordered granting time to vacate .....

The Gujarat Electricity Board Vs. the Ahmedabad Electricity Co. Ltd. a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1974SC314; (1974)4SCC623; [1974]2SCR492

..... given to the state government to constitute by notification in the official gazette a state electricity board. its constitution and jurisdiction are given in chapter iii of the act, section 12 of which says that the board shall be a body corporate having perpetual succession and common seal with power to acquire and hold property and to sue ..... of the authority.15. we have then to see if there are any statutory provisions which make disputes between them referable to the arbitration of the authority. section 76 of the act read as follows in 1964 when the present dispute arose :76(1) all questions arising between the state government or the board and a licensee or ..... brought the new rates into effect from 16-11-1963.4. after applying its mind in greater detail the board proposed to appoint a rating committee under section 57a of the act, being of the view that the electricity company was over-charging the consumers which it was not entitled to do. but before constituting the rating committee .....

Espinoza Vs. Farah Mfg. Co., Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... statutory phrase "national origin" did not embrace citizenship. 462 f.2d 1331. we granted the writ to resolve this question of statutory construction, 411 u.s. 946, and now affirm. section 703 makes it "an unlawful employment practice for an employer . . . to fail or refuse to hire . . . any individual . . . because of such individual's race, ..... ] see, e.g., minnesota state act against discrimination, minn.stat. 363.01, subd. 6 (1971), defining "national origin" as "the place of birth of ..... . we agree with the court of appeals that neither the language of the act, nor its history, nor the specific page 414 u. s. 96 facts of this case indicate that respondent has engaged in unlawful discrimination because of national origin. affirmed. [ footnote 1 ] section 706(c), 42 u.s.c. 2000e-5(e). [ footnote 2 .....