Court : Orissa
Decided on : Jan-01-1973
Reported in : AIR1973Ori157
..... had not been partitioned by metes and bounds. thus the court's finding to this effect is perfectly correct. 8. mr. das also urged that the court below acted illegally in arriving at the said finding as it did not appreciate the question in the correct legal perspective. he contends that the said finding is illegal inasmuch as there ..... the joint family property by metes and bounds between them. according to mr. das in view of the above-mentioned specific averment in the written statement the court below acted illegally in making out a new case for the defendants and deciding the case on that basis. he also urged that the aforesaid conclusion about severance of the joint ..... of defendants nos. 1 to 4 in respect of ac. 0.19 decimals of land. all these transactions were without any legal necessity, without any consideration and were not acted upon. plaintiffs nos. 1 and 2 came to know of the execution of the aforesaid kabalas only after defendant no. 5 left the family and went to live at .....
Tag this Judgment!