Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Court: mumbai Year: 2006 Page 60 of about 612 results (0.046 seconds)

Feb 07 2006 (TRI)

Walchand Hindustan Ltd. Vs. the Asst. Cit [Alongwith Int. T.A.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-07-2006

Reported in : (2006)102ITD331(Mum.)

..... which carries on, as its principal business, the business of acceptance of deposits from its members and which is declared by the central government under section 620a of the companies act, 1956 (1 of 1956), to be a nidhi or mutual benefit society; va) a residuary non-banking company [other than a financial company ..... operative societies engaged in the business of banking, public financial institutions, state financial corporations and other financial companies the term "financial company" is defined in section 2(5b) of the act to mean a hire purchase finance company, an investment company, a housing finance company, a loan company, or mutual benefit financial company, a company which ..... . the learned departmental representative, on the other hand, strongly supported the findings of the cit(a) in this regard according to her. section 2(5b) of the interest-tax act does not make a distinction of shares held as investment or as stock-in-trade.the learned cit(a), according to her, has correctly .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 06 2006 (HC)

Siddheshwar Devasthan Vs. Asstt. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-06-2006

Reported in : 2008[10]STR236

ORDER1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and respondents.2. Rule, Rule (sic) made returnable forthwith.3. Learned counsel for respondents waives service.4. By consent of the parties taken up for final hearing.5. By this petition, the petitioner is challenging the order of the appellate authority dated 8-11-2005. The said appellate authority has held that the petitioner should furnish the full details to the adjudicating authority so as to enable the adjudicating the authority to quantify the service tax liability. The appellant authority has rightly observed that the petitioner ought to have provided all the details of tax liability from 1st July, 1997 so as to enable the adjudicating authority to quantify the service tax liability.6. In view thereof, Mr. Kumbhakoni, learned Counsel states that the petitioner will furnish all the requisite particulars of details with regard to service tax liability from 1st July, 1997 to the adjudicating authority to enable the said adjudicatin...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 03 2006 (HC)

Guna Gaonkar and anr. Vs. Administrative Tribunal and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-03-2006

Reported in : 2006(3)ALLMR389; 2006(3)BomCR46

..... in a case where an application for special leave to appeal from an order of acquittal is filed after the coming into force of the limitation act, 1963, section 5 would be available to the applicant and if he can show that he had sufficient cause for not preferring the application within the time limit ..... of the administrator. this has relevancy also while considering the applicability or non-applicability of the provisions of law comprised under sections 4 to 24 of the limitation act, 1963. section 5 of the limitation act which deals with the power to condone the delay specifically provides that : any appeal or any application, other than an ..... preferred beyond the period of limitation prescribed under the said devasthan regulations, the provisions of the said regulations would prevail over the provisions of limitation act and the provisions of sections 4 to 24 thereof would not apply to such proceedings. attention was also drawn to the decisions in cases of sakuru. v. tanaji reported .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 03 2006 (HC)

Kuldeep Pednekar Vs. Ajit Pandurang Gogate and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-03-2006

Reported in : 2006(3)ALLMR606; 2006(4)BomCR392

..... newspaper reports, therefore, will render the petition as presented as not true copy thereof and therefore liable to be dismissed in limine under section 86(1) read with section 81(3) of the act.69. the next document which the respondent no. 1 submits has not been annexed, though integral part of the petition, which is ..... no. 1 printed and published the posters without printing the name and address of the printer and the publisher thereof and therefore violated the mandate of section 127-a of the act. as mentioned earlier, the original poster wherein the name of the printer, publisher does not appear has not been produced. only english translation has been ..... to what exactly is the content of the expression 'material facts and particulars, which the election petitioner shall incorporate in his petition by virtue of section 83(1) of the act.(1) what are material facts and particulars? material facts are facts which if established would give the petitioner the relief asked for. the test .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 03 2006 (HC)

State of Maharashtra Vs. K.B. Nimbalkar and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-03-2006

Reported in : 2006(2)BomCR777

..... jurisdiction, power and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. but that finding must be based on some evidence. neither the technical rules of evidence act nor of proof of fact or evidence as defined therein, apply to disciplinary proceeding. when the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receives support therefrom, the ..... disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge. the court/tribunal in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to reappreciate the evidence and to arrive at its own independent findings on the evidence. the court/tribunal may interfere where the authority held ..... in arriving at a conclusion that the charge of misconduct had been partly established as against the first respondent. the first respondent was found to have acted in breach of his duties and functions as a senior jailor attached to byculla prison in that, despite information being brought to his notice that an .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 02 2006 (HC)

Shri Imran Son of Shri Mahmudmiya Ibrahim Shaikh Through His Father Vs ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-02-2006

Reported in : 2006(2)ALLMR588; 2006(2)BomCR3; 2006(2)MhLj830

..... b.j. medical college, pune. it is the case of the petitioner that he was deprived of admission to the mbbs degree course by the fourth and sixth respondents who acted in concert with a view to favour some other candidate. the petitioner has submitted that he was victimised because he has no connections, being the son of a bus conductor .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 02 2006 (TRI)

Span Diagnostics Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-02-2006

..... to be life-saving drugs and medicines. (c) there is force in the pleading of the appellants that reading of the second schedule to drugs and cosmetics act entry no. 2 & 5b and section 3(b)(iv) would indicate that the said goods are known and understood by the present appellant and the trade which deals with them as life-saving drugs ..... -1999. they comply the condition no. 5 applicable to such importers as set out in the customs (import of goods at concessional rate of duly for manufacture of excisable goods) act, 1996 which was required to be followed. they have in pursuance of this stipulation obtained necessary certifications from the asst. commissioner of central excise, incharge of their factory. the claim .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 01 2006 (HC)

JabIn Akhtar Shirgonkar and ors. Vs. Samshad Iqbal Mukadam and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-01-2006

Reported in : 2006(2)ALLMR595; 2006(2)BomCR9; 2006(2)MhLj555

..... ' is also defined in this provision.a bare perusal of this definition would mean that these persons have to be elected in accordance with sections 30, 30a, 44 or 43 of the act. section 30 deals with the election of sarpanch. it provides that the election of sarpanch shall be held in the first meeting held after every general ..... shall give his decision as far as possible within sixty days of the receipt of the reference, or as the case may be, appeal).22. by section 176 of the act, power has been conferred upon the state government to make rules. the rules are to be made for carrying into effect the purpose of the ..... 35 of 2005.3. respondent nos. 1 to 7 filed the above grampanchayat appeal invoking the jurisdiction of the additional collector under section 33(5) of the bombay village panchayats act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as 'village panchayat act'). they are the members of grampanchayat, karla, taluka & district: ratnagiri. they challenged the elections to the posts of sarpanch and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 30 2006 (TRI)

Tomas Cook (India) Limited Vs. the Dy./Jt. Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-30-2006

Reported in : (2006)103ITD119(Mum.)

..... years are, therefore, upheld on this issue.14. the next issue which is common to all the appeals relates to computation of deduction under section 80hhd of the income tax act, 1961 (act).15. briefly stated the facts are these: the facts relating to this issue are almost similar in all the appeals except the figures on various ..... law and in relation to execution (27 halsbury's laws (3rd edn.). "money" includes a cheque, banknote, postal order or money order (betting, gaming and lotteries act, 1963, section 55). money - in usual and ordinary acceptation it means coins and paper currency used as circulating medium of exchange, and does not embrace notes, bonds, evidences of ..... common order for the sake of convenience.2. the main issue arising in these appeals is whether assessee is eligible to claim deduction under section 80hhc of the income tax act, 1961 (act). briefly stated the facts are these: the assessee was engaged in the business of tour operator as well as dealing in foreign currency. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 27 2006 (TRI)

Dy. Cit Vs. Sarabhai Piramal

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-27-2006

..... from a third party under its direct control and supervision with a particular specification the assessee is engaged in manufacturing process for the purpose of section 35ab of the act.24. having applied this proposition to the instant case, we find that the assessee has acquired technical know-how against the lump sum consideration ..... pharmaceuticals.23. from a careful reading of the aforesaid judgments, we arrive at a conclusion that there are two conditions precedent before claiming deduction under section 35ab of the act, i.e., (1) the assessee should have acquired the know-how against a lump-sum consideration which was paid in the relevant previous year; ..... 140-141 was also placed. mr.agarwal further contended that analysis of the statutory provision will reveal that the following essential requirements for claiming deduction under section 35ab of the act are required to be satisfied: (a) that the assessee should incur a lump sum consideration in order to acquire the know-how; (b) that .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //