Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Court: mumbai Page 1 of about 20,352 results (0.163 seconds)

Rukmini Malbari and ors. Vs. Shri Shankar Vithal Shinde and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1995(3)BomCR418

..... the selling of such types of products. there is also in force of the explosives act, 1884 and the explosives substances acts, 1908 which regulates the matter and defines what is explosive or explosive substance. the learned counsel has taken me through section 4(d) of the explosives act, 1884 which gives an exhaustive definition of the word 'explosive' and from which it can be seen that kerosene is not included in ..... this definition. similarly section 2 of the explosives substances act, 1908 defines 'explosive substance' as including any materials for making any explosive substance. in other words .....

Abdul Hamid Haji Mohammed Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1995(2)ALT(Cri)11; 1994(4)BomCR51; (1994)96BOMLR239; 1994CriLJ1447

..... the said arms would definitely attract section 6(1) of the tada act. section 6(1) of the tada act provides as under:-'6. enhanced penalties.---(1) if any person with intent to aid any terrorism or disruptionist, contravenes any provision of, or any rule made under the arms act 1954 (54 of 1959), the explosive act, 1884 (4 of 1884), the explosive substances act, 1908 (6 of 1908) or the ..... inflammable substances act, 1952 (20 of 1952), he .....

Kashinath Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... the commission of cognizable offence. hence, the offence was registered against the appellant for the offence punishable under section 302, 307, 341, 294 of the ipc, section 3 read with section 25 of the arms act and section 3 and 4 of the explosive substances act. 1908 vide crime no.146/2011. the printed fir is at exh.27. as per the oral ..... pay a fine of rs.500/- in default to undergo further simple imprisonment for 15 days. he was also convicted for an offence punishable under section 3(a) of the explosive substances act and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and to pay a fine of rs.1000/- in default to undergo further simple imprisonment for one ..... witnesses. after full fledge trial, the learned sessions judge found that the prosecution has only proved the case for the offence punishable under sections 302 and 324 of the ipc and section 3(a) of the explosive substances act. 6. we have heard mr. r.r. vyas, learned counsel for the appellant and mr. t.a. mirza, learned a. .....

CTR Manufacturing Industries Ltd. Vs. Serji Transformer Explosion Prev ...

Court : Mumbai

..... /or fire of electrical transformers . (d) ctr was granted its patent no. 202302 on 3rd august 2006 under section 43 of the patent act for a system and method for preventing, protecting and/or detecting explosion and/or fire of electrical transformers. (e) on 20th january 2010, delhi transco ltd ( dtl ) floated tender t/ ..... s director, phillipe magnier, filed an indian patent application for registration of an invention entitled method and device for preventing/protecting electrical transformer against explosion and fire under the patents act. this was then licensed to sergi. (b) on 14th december 2002, sergi obtained patent no.189089 in respect of this application. sergi ..... itself conform to that standard. these are printouts of digital or electronic documents, and they require, the supreme court tells us, the necessary certifications under section 65b of the evidence act. (anvar pv v pk basheer and ors., (2014) 10 scc 473;).i do not find those. if, absent those certificates, the material is .....

Phantom Films Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. Central Board of Film Certific ...

Court : Mumbai

..... or contempt of court or is likely to incite the commission of any offence. the words "sovereignty and integrity of india" came to be added in sub-section (1) of section 5b by act 49 of 1981 with effect from 1st june, 1983. that is because clause (2) of article 19 of the constitution of india itself was amended to ..... air 1980 sc 605. the hon'ble supreme court of india has held as under:- "(air 1980 sc 258) "14. i am satisfied that the film censor board, acting under section 5-a, is specially entrusted to screen off the silver screen pictures which offensively invade or deprave public morals through over-sex. there is no doubt - and counsel on ..... and what one regards as lecherous another man may consider elevating. ..." "7. indeed, the penal code is general, the cinematograph act is special. the scheme of the latter is deliberately drawn up to meet the explosively expanding cinema menace if it were not strictly policed. no doubt, the cinema is a great instrument for public good is geared to .....

Shaikh Zahid Mukhtar and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Other ...

Court : Mumbai

..... the petitions by passing the following order: order: (a) we hereby hold and declare that section 5, section 5a, section 5b, section 5c, sub-sections (3) and (4) of section 8, section 9 and section 9a of the maharashtra animal preservation act, 1976 as amended/inserted by the maharashtra act no.v of 2015 are constitutional, valid and legal; (b) however, we hold that the ..... must be adopted in the trial, are part of procedural due process. this is what the court said in the old case of hagar vs. reclamation dist. (1884)111 us 701): by due process of law is meant one which, following the forms of law, is appropriate to the case and just to the parties ..... he did the act with some other less heinous purpose if such be the fact. lord diplock held that presumptions of this kind are a common feature of modern legislation concerning possession and use of things that present danger to society like additive drugs, explosives, arms and ammunition, and accordingly, upheld the validity of section 15 as .....

Eros International Media Limited Vs. Telemax Links India Pvt. Ltd. and ...

Court : Mumbai

..... under trade mark, copyright and patent law are not mentioned. there is no authority mentioned for the former proposition. 16.section 62 of the copyright act 1957 corresponds almost exactly to section 134 of the trade marks act, 1999: infringement and passing off actions cannot be brought in a court lower than a jurisdictionally competent district court, one ..... were declared by arbitral award to have no right, title or interest in these marks. the arbitrator issued an injunction permanently restraining those others from using or explosing in the course of trade or otherwise any of those marks in any territory. no question was ever raised before the supreme court in v. h. ..... in terms of prayer clause (c), which reads as under: (c) that this hon ble court be pleased to pass an order under section 8 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 referring the present suit to arbitration pursuant to the arbitration agreement contained in the term sheet dated 13th june 2012 executed between the .....

Vidarbha Taxpayers Association and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra, U ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... already discussed hereinabove, the authority would be empowered to levy fee only after a notification is published in the official gazette, as required under sub-section 1 of section 11 of the said act. undisputedly the notification is issued on 3.3.2014. by now, it is a settled principle of law that the authority would be empowered ..... buildings or group or complexes of buildings or slums are prone to frequent fire hazards. in slum areas, unscrupulous persons have been using premises for keeping hazardous explosives and highly inflammable goods. major fires in such buildings and slums have taken a heavy toll of human life and heavy damage to the property. the disaster ..... schedule ii. 23. however, in the present case, even prior to notification being issued under sub-section 1 of section 11 of the act of 2006, after the notification was issued under sub-section 3 of section 1 of the said act, the corporation has imposed and collected the fees at twice the rate as provided in schedule ii of .....

Mallika Sherawat @ Reema Lamba Vs. State of Maharashtra and Another

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... of censor board and accordingly certificates were issued by the censor board. in case, any person is aggrieved by such certificate, remedy lies under section 5d of the cinematograph act. but then certification by the censor board, could not have been ignored and in the instant case, even by magistrate. the magistrate did not ..... the relevant paragraphs of the said judgment which read thus: 7. indeed, the penal code is general, the cinematograph act is special. the scheme of the latter is deliberately drawn up to meet the explosively expanding cinema menace if it were not strictly policed. no doubt, the cinema is a great instrument for public good ..... summons. the first question is answered against the appellant accordingly. ? 23. therefore, the position has now come to rest to the effect that the revisional jurisdiction under section 397 crpc is available to the aggrieved party in challenging the order of the magistrate, directing issuance of summons. ? 9. in view of above, following order .....

CTR Manufacturing Industries Limited Vs. SERGI Transformer Explosion P ...

Court : Mumbai

..... that grant was issued (vol. g-1, p. 246/51). 6. ctr was granted its patent no. 202302 on 3rd august 2006 under section 43 of the patent act for a system and method for preventing, protecting and/or detecting explosion and/or fire of electrical transformers. ? (vol. a, part (a), p. 39). 7. on 15th december 2008, the 1st defendant ( ..... . on 7th february 2011, sergi unconditionally withdrew its suit. 7.5 ctr was granted its patent no. 202302 on 3rd august 2006 under section 43 of the patent act for a system and method for preventing, protecting and/or detecting explosion and/or fire of electrical transformers. ? (vol. a, part (a), p. 39). 7.6 sergi filed what it calls a ..... pre-grant opposition under section 25(1) of the patents act on 20th january 2010. (vol. c, comp, 5, pp. 229-230, paragraphs 11 and 12). 7.7 on .....