Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Court: mumbai Year: 2006 Page 46 of about 612 results (0.097 seconds)

SumikIn Bussan (Hong Kong) International Limited Vs. Manharlal Trikamd ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2006(6)ALLMR347; 2006(4)BomCR131

..... could not eject him or his heirs from the land which formed the site of the house. reliance was placed by the learned counsel for the appellant on section 59, easements act. this section, as pointed out by katiar in the law of easements and licences in british india, page 355, has been enacted solely in order to avoid an inference ..... in the cases of ram sarup gupta, m.f. de souza and dominion of india. 23. it is incorrect that the supreme court did not consider section 64 of the indian easements act. sections 62 and 64 were specifically and in terms referred to in paragraph 9 of ram sarup gupta's case. not that it would have carried the appellant' ..... by necessary implication that the license nevertheless shall be revocable. see liggins v. inge (1831) 7 bin 682 which was applied by the judicial committee in primmer v. wellington corporation (1884) 9 a. c. 699 : 53 j.p.c. 104, gujarat ginning and ., ahmedabad v. moti lal hirabhai spinning and ., ahemedabad and ganga sahai v. badrul islam a.i. .....

In Re: Zenta P. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [2009]149CompCas413(Bom)

..... three submissions. the first contention is that the three transferor companies are registered outside india and no indian court has jurisdiction over them; sections in the indian companies act are silent about involvement of a foreign company; the second and third transferor companies have no authority to merge and as far as ..... same envisages amalgamation and vesting of companies properties and assets, more so, with companies outside mauritius.6. he places reliance upon section 390 of the companies act and the definition of the term ''company' appearing therein.7. mr. tulzapurkar, learned senior counsel appearing for petitioner has invited my attention to ..... section 2(7) of the companies act which defines 'body corporate' or 'corporation' and reads thus:2(7). 'body corporate' or 'corporation' includes a company incorporated outside india .....

Commissioner of Customs (import) Vs. Wockhardt Hospital and Heart Inst ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2006(200)ELT15(Bom)

..... exemption notification no. 64/88-cus by furnishing requisite certificate from the dghs.9. by a show cause notice dated 13/12/2000 issued under section 124 of the customs act, the assistant commissioner of customs, mumbai called upon the foundation to show cause as to why the medical equipments cleared without payment of duty should ..... they have utilized them for their full life ?13. mr. pakale, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the revenue submitted that under section 12 of the customs act which is a charging section, duties of customs are leviable on all goods which are imported into india. although the taxable event occurs the moment goods enter the ..... or eclipsed. if the owner fails to comply with the conditions attached to the notification, then the exemption becomes unavailable and full duty becomes payable under section 12 of the customs act. in this connection, he relied upon a judgment of the kerala high court in the case of aluminium industries v. union of india reported in .....

Tata Sons Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2007)104ITD45(Mum.)

..... exhaustive inasmuch as the word defined is said to mean a certain thing, it is possible for the word to have a somewhat different meaning in different sections of the act depending upon the subject or the context. further, that a definition or interpretation clause which extends the meaning of a word should not be construed as ..... of the tribunal, this ground of the assessee is allowed.4. next ground is against not treating the company as a financial company as per section 40a(8) of the it act, 1961 (the act). this ground was also a matter of adjudication in the appeals cited (supra) for asst. yr. 1984-85 and it was held that the ..... company). sub-clauses (a), (aa) and (ab) of the said definition deal with special categories of companies (e.g. government-owned companies, companies registered under section 25 of the companies act, 1956, companies having no share capital) which are regarded as widely held companies. sub-clause (b), which is applicable in the generality of cases, provides that a .....

Tata Sons Limited Vs. the Deputy Cit, Special Range-1

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

..... inasmuch as the word defined is said to mean a certain thing, it is possible for the word to have a somewhat different meaning in different sections of the act depending upon the subject or the context. further, that a definition or interpretation clause which extends the meaning of a word should no be construed ..... sub-clauses (a), (aa) and (ab) of the said definition deal with special categories of companies (e.g. government-owned companies, companies registered under section 25 of the companies act, 1956, companies having no share capital) which are regarded as widely-held companies. sub-clause (b), which is applicable in the generality of cases, provides ..... even though it may have been registered as a private company. similarly, if we consider clause (aa), it includes a company which is registered under section 25 of the companies act, 1956. these companies are generally entities like chambers of commerce, clubs etc. which are essentially non-profit making concerns and in the absence of .....

Bankerai Ambikarai Sharma Vs. State of Maharashtra, Through the Direct ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2006(6)BomCR849

..... counted for determining placement of a lecturer in the senior scale/ selection grade/reader's post, since according to the provisions of the bombay university act, 1974, section 2(30) a full-time demonstrator, tutor and master of method have been included in the definition of the term 'teacher'. similarly the ..... beneficial resolution applied only to full time teachers. the learned single judge referred to the definition of teacher appearing in section 2(30) of the then applicable bombay university act, 1974 which reads as follows:section 2(30). 'teacher means a full time professor, associate professor, reader, lecturer, demonstrator, tutor, master of ..... statutes made on the recommendation of the academic council.' the learned judge quoted section 3 of the statute framed under the bombay university act, 1974 which reads as follows:the term 'teacher' within the meaning of section 2(30) of the bombay university act shall in addition to full time professor, associate, professor, reader, lecturer .....

Sardar Gurudas Singh Bedi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(2)BomCR504; 2006(33)PTC321(Bom)

..... opposition to the registration of a trade mark may be given, shall be four months from the date of advertisement of the application for registration.trade and merchandise marks act, 1958:section 21 - opposition to registration - (1) any person may, within three months from the date of the advertisement or re-advertisement of an application for registration or ..... of the application for registration in the journal.rule 51(3) was omitted by notification no. s.o. 397 dated 23rd january, 1969.trade marks act, 1999.section 21 of the trade marks act, 1999 reads as under:opposition to registration: (1) any person may, within three months from the date of the advertisement or re-advertisment of ..... the goods of another person or firm or industry.is rule 47(6) as now framed, in consonance with section 21 of the act, and if not, is it ultra vires section 21 of the 1959 act. section 21 of the act states that any person may, within three months from the date of the advertisement or re-advertisement of an .....

Shri Zulal Sayara Rajput and Shri Bhagwan Dharmaji Dhole Vs. the State ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2006(4)ALLMR471; 2007(3)BomCR477; 2006(5)MhLj66

..... petitioners. 10. on behalf of the respondents it is contended that definition of expression 'primary education' as used in section 2(j)(ii) of the maharashtra employees of private schools (conditions of service regulation) act, 1977 is inclusive of any education imparted in a primary school in such subject and upto such standard as may be ..... 23). it is pertinent to note that benefit of permanency of service was given to them from date of initial appointment under section 5(2) of the maharashtra employees of private schools (conditions of service regulation) act, 1977. thus, the petitioner no. 1 was deemed as permanent in the service w.e.f. 1st july, 1987 and ..... determined by the government from time to time. the primary school is one which imparts primary education. the petitioners are transferred to primary section of the school and as .....

Prabhakar S/O Pitambar Tambat Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(1)MhLj722

..... section 13(1)(d) read with section 13(2) of the prevention of corruption act and was sentenced to undergo r.i. for one year and to pay fine of rs. 2,000/-.2. the prosecution case in brief ..... obtaining necessary sanction from the collector, jalgaon, charge-sheet was filed against the accused.5. the accused was charged for the offences punishable under section 7 and 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the prevention of corruption act. he pleaded not guilty. according to accused as directed by s.d.o. bagul, the complainant had agreed to invest rs. 1,000 ..... present appeal challenging the order of conviction passed by the learned special judge, jalgaon in special case no. 7/1989, whereby the accused was convicted for the offence punishable under section 7 and sentenced to undergo r.i. for 6 months and to pay fine of rs. 2,000/- and was also convicted for the offence under .....

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Veera Pandiyan Chinaswamy and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : IV(2006)ACC668

Abhay S. Oka, J.1. Rule. Respondent No. waives service. Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the parties.2. The appeal is preferred only by the insurer of the vehicle involved in the accident. In the Trial Court, a plea was taken by the appellant-Insurance Company that the driver of the concerned vehicle was not holding a valid and effective driving licence. In the Memorandum of Appeal, a plea is raised that the victim was travelling as a gratuitous passenger.3. It is well-settled position of law that the burden of establishing that there was a breach of policy condition by the insurer is always on the Insurance Company. Prima facie, it appears that the said burden is not discharged in this case as no evidence is led by the appellant. The case which is made out in the Memorandum of Appeal does not appear to have been made out in the Trial Court.4. Even if the appellant succeeds in the first appeal, the award which is made against the insurer will remain. In such an event, the appe...