Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Court: mumbai Year: 2006 Page 39 of about 612 results (0.214 seconds)

Employees State Insurance Corporation Vs. R.K. Furnaces and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2006(5)BomCR61; [2006(111)FLR478]

..... presiding officer, employees insurance court, north goa at panaji in esic no. 4/ 2000. this appeal is preferred under section 82 of the employees state insurance act, 1948 (for short, 'the said act'). under section 82 of the said act, an appeal lies to the high court from an order of an employees' insurance court if it involves a substantial ..... measures by directions given finally leading to the satisfactory completion and acceptance of the work, that would in our view be supervision for the purposes of section 2(9) of the act.9. in this case also the four workers found in the premises of the establishment were workers of r.k. electricals. a finding of fact ..... and the court was concerned with a number of workmen engaged in that construction activity. while considering whether they are employees within the meaning of section 2(9) of the said act, the supreme court observed as under:the work construction of additional buildings required for the expansion of a factory must be held to be ancillary .....

Mr. Saleem Fazelbhoy Vs. Dcit

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2007)106ITD167(Mum.)

..... gains tax - whether investment in a flat under the self-financing scheme of the delhi development authority would be construction for purpose of sections 54 and 54f of the income tax act, 1961. - section 54 and 54f of the income-tax act, 1961, provide that capital gains arising on transfer of a long-term capital asset shall not be charged to tax to the ..... of cost of purchase. so, the entire dispute centers round the interpretation of the provisions of section 54f of the act. therefore, it would be appropriate to reproduce the relevant portion of the provisions of section 54f as under: 54f. (1) subject to the provisions of sub-section (4), where, in the case of an assessee being an individual or a hindu undivided ..... 1. the main issue arising in this appeal relates to denial of assessee's claim under section 54f of the income tax act, 1961 (act) with reference to the sum of rs. 28,66,675/-.2. briefly stated the facts are these: the assessee had sold 89,998 shares of koyal finvest pvt. ltd. .....

New Woodlands Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and Mr. Chandrakant T. ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2006(5)BomCR74

..... occupiers. the term 'occupier' is not defined under dcr and for that purpose we may have to refer to the definition of this concept under the mhada act. mhada act defines 'occupier' in section 2(25) as follows:2.(25) occupier include:(a) any person who for the time being is paying or is liable to pay to the owner the ..... all these tenancies are bogus, then what will remain will be the self-occupied building. it will not be a cessed building and, therefore, benefit of this act will not be available. section 84(1) provides for various categories of assessment and buildings prior to 1940 are classified as 'a' category building.17. mr. divan then drew our attention to ..... for accommodating the occupants of other cessed building which cannot be reconstructed. the table in the third schedule is to be read with clause 3 of section 103-i of the mhada act which provides as to how the surplus area is to be calculated. mumbai repair and reconstruction board has to pay for acquiring this surplus area an .....

Rajlingu Pentu Parkewar Vs. Sayamabai Rajlingu Parkewar and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2006CriLJ3710; I(2007)DMC396

..... admittedly as many as on two occasions, between the same parties, though there was compromise entered into, there was no such plea raised at all. therefore, parties admittedly agreed and acted upon the valid relationship was husband and wife.5. the revisional court is further right in holding that there is no documentary proof placed on record to support the said .....

Commissioner of Customs (Export) Vs. Radhey Shyam Ratanlal

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

..... that the supreme court decision in the rajkumar knitting mills (p) ltd. case cited supra was relevant in respect of shipments made prior to 1988 under the old section 14 of the customs act, 1962 where the assessable value was considered to be deemed value at which like goods are sold and not the actual value or the transaction value.the law ..... (p) ltd. case reported in 1998 (98) e.l.t. 292 (s.c.) wherein the hon'ble supreme court had interpreted section 14 of the customs act, 1962 which he used as base to his conclusion. the definition of value under section 14 and the rules made there under create a conflict in so far as the rules when considered in isolation take ..... one to the contract value whereas the value under section 14 takes one to the price at the time of place of .....

A.R. Ravindra (Commander) Vs. Jagannath B. Jagtap

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2006(5)MhLj546

..... mind, i shall now endeavour to examine the case made out by the rival sides.11. the first question is as to the import of section 13-a(1) of the act. section 13-a(1) of the act is a special provision which comes to the aid of the designated landlord, inter alia, who is a member of armed forces of the union ..... children for education. to examine this claim, it will be necessary to advert to the definition of member of the family provided in the explanation below sub-section (2) of section 13-a(1) of the act. clause (2) of the explanation reads as under:(2) 'member of the family' means any of the following members of the family of a member ..... /landlord. even so, the said issue no. 4 came to be answered against the tenants. the tenants have therefore carried the revision applications before this court under section 31f of the act to question the correctness of the conclusion reached on the issue no. 4-as to whether the sale of the premises in favour of the applicant was colourable transaction .....

Subhash ManmoThe Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007CriLJ537

..... no challenge made to this communication also.4. after considering the material placed on the record the concerned department has refused to grant permission/sanction, as envisaged under section 197 of the criminal procedure code (cr. p.c.) against the petitioner. the advocate appearing for the petitioner, therefore, makes submission that on the sole ground itself, this ..... of the public servant. the concept 'official duty' has been explained, to mean 'if on facts, therefore, it is prima facie found that the act or omission for which the accused was charged had reasonable connection with discharge of his duty then it must be held to be official to which applicability of ..... servant was discharging his official duty or not required examination and such act or action needs detailed trial. in the present case as referred above, there was reasonable connection with the act and the discharge of the official duty by the petitioner. the act was within the scope and range of the official duty of the .....

Arif HussaIn Sabir HussaIn @ Pann Wala Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007CriLJ135; 2006(5)MhLj241

..... by the appellant on the basis of material collected against the appellant which forms part of the charge-sheet. 10. mr. chitnis made a specific mention of the interpretation of section 32(1) of pota made by division bench of this court in the case of mohammad gausuddin s/o. wali mohammad v. state of maharashtra, reported in 2003 all ..... state of gujarat and others in criminal appeal no. 384 of 2006 which has been decided on 4th april, 2004 wherein the supreme court has dealt with the provisions of section 49 of pota. mr. chitnis submitted that this is in the back-drop that the appellant accused is in custody for more than three years. 12. we are also ..... blast and trying them as one by the state in filing a common charge-sheet i.e. relating to the bomb explosion which took place on 6th december, 2002 at hotel mcdonald situated at mumbai central railway station, the bomb explosion which took place on 27th january, 2003 at moghibai road, opp. polydate matching centre, vile parle (e), mumbai and .....

Suresh S/O Keshav Dole Vs. Satpuda Urban Credit Co-op. Society Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : II(2007)BC280; 2006(5)MhLj709

..... on various judgments. the bombay high court recently in maheshwar dattatraya kale v. capt. atul wasudeo divekar and anr. : 2006(1)mhlj700 after considering the provisions of section 138 of n.i. act, directed to deposit half of the cheque amount of rs. 6,25,000/- within 15 days. the court after considering the similar contentions, like that of the ..... correct and permissible.5. the apex court in stanny felix pinto v. jangid builders pvt. ltd. and anr. (2001)2 scc 416 while considering sections 389, 397 and 401 read with section 138 of n.i. act, has held that the high court's order requiring the accused to remit rs. 4,00,000/-, a part of fine amount, within a ..... of the conviction order.2. the respondent-original complainant has filed a complaint in c. c. no. 914 of 2004 before the j.m.f.c. yawal, under section 138 of negotiable instruments act (n.i. act) based on two cheques of rs. 25,000/- each. the cheques were returned back and therefore, proceedings have been initiated under the n.i .....

Gajanan Ramraoji Ambagovind and ors. Vs. Corporation of the City of Na ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2006(6)BomCR413; 2006(4)MhLj789

..... both the authorities have nowhere analysed or appreciated any such material if at all was available before the concerned authorities before issuing the notice/order under section 289(1) of the act.16. the contention on behalf of respondent no. 8 that the issue as to whether the building in question is repairable or not stands ..... expertise in the field and further the opinion be formed on the basis of such materials which would be available before issuing the notice/order under section 289(1) of the act.14. undoubtedly, the order was sought to be justified on the basis of the additional material placed before the deputy commissioner in the proceedings in ..... corporation. the orders passed by these authorities nowhere disclose consideration of the report by the engineering staff of the corporation to justify the action under section 289(1) of the said act. the order of the deputy commissioner merely makes a mention of the fact that notices were issued after inspection carried out by the zonal .....