Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Court: delhi Year: 2003 Page 13 of about 294 results (0.675 seconds)

Jul 24 2003 (HC)

All India and General Mazdoor Union Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-24-2003

Reported in : 2003VAD(Delhi)566; 106(2003)DLT208; 2004(1)SLJ471(Delhi)

..... merits of the dispute and take upon itself the determination of the lis, which would certainly be in excess of the power conferred on it by section 10 of the act.'6. the impugned order adjudicating the question of whether punjab bhawan activities were `industry' thus clearly runs contrary to the position of law laid ..... whether an industrial dispute 'exists or is apprehended', but it is not entitled to adjudicate the dispute itself on merits. while exercising power under section 10(1) of the act the function of the appropriate government is an administrative function and not a judicial or quasi-judicial function. in performing this administrative function the government ..... & 2 years respectively and upon their termination of services and rejection of the demand notice dated 5th april, 1996, sought to raise an industrial dispute under section 12 of the act. on 27th august, 1997, an order was passed by the secretary (labour), government of nct of delhi that the dispute cannot be referred as the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 24 2003 (TRI)

Do Best Infoway Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jul-24-2003

Reported in : (2004)(91)ECC625

..... rejection of a transaction value for assessment does not make the declaration of value made in the customs declaration a mis-declaration making the goods liable to confiscation under section 111(m) and importer to penalty.3. we have perused the record and have considered the submission made by both sides. the present import has taken place ..... the goods at the rate of rs. 173.61 per piece. it also proposed confiscation of the goods under section 111(m) of the customs act, 1962 and imposition of penalty under sections 112 and 117 of the customs act, 1962. the appellant filed reply to the show-cause notice explaining that the transaction value represented commercial value of ..... rs. 50,000 on the appellant.2. appellants have contended in the present appeal that the entire proceedings were misconceived and contrary to specific legal provisions in the customs act and customs valuation rules as well as the law laid down by the apex court in the case of eicher tractor ltd., 2000 (72) ecc 673 (sc) : .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 23 2003 (HC)

Madan Lal Kapur Vs. Subhash Lal Kapur and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-23-2003

Reported in : 2003VIIIAD(Delhi)108; 105(2003)DLT987; 2003(71)DRJ732

..... evidence for proving the contents of the document except in cases where secondary evidence is allowed to be led under the relevant provisions of the evidence act.5. section 92 excludes the evidence of oral agreements and it applies to cases where the terms of contracts, grants or other dispositions of property have been ..... by the plaintiff, the prescription for registration should have become otiose. the question which has to be answered is whether the rigours of section 92 of the evidence act have been sufficiently complied with. a plethora of precedents was presented by learned counsel for the parties in support of reading the agreement ex ..... 21.10.1982, dismissed the application holding that the agreement being compulsorily registerable and having not been registered could not be read in evidence as laid down in section 49 of the registration act. the learned judge referred to minor dorairaj vs . k.kr. karuppiah ambalam and others , : air1970mad119 , nani bai vs . gita bai kom rama gunge .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 23 2003 (HC)

Shri Anek Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-23-2003

Reported in : 2004(2)SLJ510(Delhi)

..... order, removing him from service, was passed. the disciplinary authority, disagreeing with the finding of the inquiry officer on the first charge, held that raising of tone was definitely an act of indiscipline and thereforee, this charge also stood proved. petitioner's appeal to the appellate authority against the said order was unsuccessful. being aggrieved, the petitioner preferred the original application .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 22 2003 (TRI)

Kanha Vanaspati Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jul-22-2003

Reported in : (2003)(157)ELT659TriDel

..... nature and the amount in question is the sale proceed of the smuggled goods.6. we find that the appellants are challenging the confiscation under section 121 of the customs act. the section 121 of the customs act provides that where any smuggled goods are sold by a person having knowledge or reason to believe that goods are smuggled goods, the sale ..... amount of rs. 69.03 lakhs which were confiscated by the adjudicating authority.4. the contention of the appellant is that amounts in question were confiscated under section 121 of the customs act as a sale proceedings of smuggled goods. appellants were bona fide purchaser of the goods and they had paid more than rs. 4 crores to the seller ..... 1. appellants filed this appeal against the adjudication order whereby the amount of rs. 69.03 lakhs was confiscated under section 121 of the customs act, 1962.2. brief facts of the case are that the appellants purchased the goods imported by m/s. associated industries for rs. 5,35,23,958/- and paid only .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 21 2003 (HC)

Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan and anr. Vs. Ram Kumar and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-21-2003

Reported in : III(2003)ACC21; 105(2003)DLT965; 2003(70)DRJ215; (2003)135PLR28; 2004(1)SLJ183(Delhi)

..... for grant of compensation to the said respondent. reliance for this is placed on the definition of 'service matters' in section 3(q) of the administrative tribunals act. 'service matters' under the act have been defined to mean matters as respects remuneration, pension, retirement benefits, tenure including confirmation, seniority, promotion, reversion, ..... will have the jurisdiction to decide under the administrative tribunals act. it is a statutory right under the workmens' compensation act and does not come within the definition of 'service matters' under section 3(q) of the administrative tribunals act and the central administrative tribunal would have no jurisdiction to decide ..... other matter whatsoever'. it is submitted that since the 'service matters' under section 3(q) would also mean 'any other matter whatsoever' it will include the matter about the grant of compensation under the workmens' compensation act. 4. i am not in agreement with learned counsel for the appellant inasmuch .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 19 2003 (TRI)

V.K. JaIn and Sons Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jul-19-2003

Reported in : (2003)(89)ECC23

..... has rightly contended that this was stated by v.k.jain without any basis whatsoever. no doubt the impugned goods have been notified under the provisions of section 123 of the customs act and the burden of proof is cast upon the persons from whose possession the goods are seized or who claim to be the owner of the goods. ..... balance quantity belonged to m/s. nia/alpine who had not only owned the same but had also accounted therefore; that they have thus discharged the burden under section 123 of the customs act; that it has been held by the tribunal in the case of s.k. chains v.commissioner of customs (prev) mumbai, 2001 (127) elt 415 that ..... could not be correlated with reference to length identification marks and markings on packing and colour, it does mean that the goods are liable for confiscation under section 111(d) of the customs act in the absence of evidence/material on record to show that the same had been smuggled. he emphasised that the identical findings have been reversed by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 17 2003 (HC)

Prakash Industries Ltd. Vs. State and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-17-2003

Reported in : 2004CriLJ744; 106(2003)DLT527; 2003(70)DRJ113; 2003(3)JCC217; 2003RLR523

..... mathew's case. in the instant case, summons were issued by the court after recording the pre-summoning evidence on a complaint filed under section 138 of negotiable instrument act. accused persons moved an application for recalling the summoning order or dropping of the proceedings by pleading that no case is made out against him ..... order dated 9.7.99 by the metropolitan magistrate. by administrative order of the high court, the complaints under section 138 of negotiable instrument act were transferred to the courts of additional sessions judges and this case was assigned to sh. prem kumar, learned additional sessions judge, new delhi ..... been issued against him.2. facts germane for the proposition of law are like this:-m/s sbi capital markets ltd. filed a complaint under section 138 of negotiable instrument act against m/s prakash industries ltd & ors its managing director, vice president (general) and two general managers. they were summoned as accused vide .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 17 2003 (TRI)

S.V.U.L. Projects Limited Vs. New India Assurance Company Limited and ...

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

Decided on : Jul-17-2003

..... for any commercial purpose. 3. the term commercial purpose occurring in the above said sub-clause, has been further defined in explanation added to clause (d) sub-section (1) of section 2 of the act as under : explanation for the purposes of this clause, commercial purpose does not include use by a person of goods bought and used by him and services availed ..... of earning his livelihood by means of self-employment. 4. on a bare perusal of the definition of the term consumer as contained in section 2 (1)(d)(ii) of the act as amended by the amending act of 2002 it is apparent that one who avails of services for any commercial purpose is not a consumer and as such a complaint filed ..... has come into force w.e.f. 15.3.2003. as a result of the amendments, effected in the act, which have come into force w.e.f. 15.3.2003, in clause (ii)(d) of sub-section (1) of section 2 of the act which defines the term consumer the following words have been added but does not include a person who avails .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 16 2003 (HC)

Sant Ram Saigal and anr. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-16-2003

Reported in : 2003VAD(Delhi)574; 105(2003)DLT746; 2003(70)DRJ42

..... made by the owner or by the occupier, or ... ... ... ...' ' 3. determination of rateable value of lands and buildings. - (1) for the purposes of sub-section (1) of section 116 of the act, the annual rent shall be determined as under :- ... ... ... ... (c) in case premises are used and occupied or are lying vacant for use and occupation by ..... municipal council, delhi cantonment board and such urban areas within the limits of the municipal corporation of delhi as are specified in terms of sub-section (2) of section 1 of the rent act. it was, thus, held that where premises were self-occupied, the concept of any monthly rent could not be introduced and the only ..... material in this behalf. the said bye-law makes it clear that where the premises to which rent restriction legislation is applicable, the principles under section 6 of the rent act would apply for determination of the rateable value. 18. as stated above, the rent restriction legislation is applicable to all the properties other than the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //