Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on : Nov-28-2003
Reported in : (2005)(1)SLJ70CAT
..... . as a preliminary objection it is stated that having failed to exhaust the statutory remedy of representation. o.a. is not maintainable in view of section 20 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985.17. in so far as another preliminary objection is concerned, it is stated that stand of applicant in the present o.a. is contrary ..... v. ashok kumar misra, (1991) 3 scc 325, held that mere expiry of initial probation period would not automatically result in deemed confirmation which is a positive act depending upon the satisfactory completion of probation.36. if one has regard to the above, keeping in line the terms and conditions of applicant, in absence of any ..... period of probation if an officer is continued beyond this prescribed period or extended period, there is no question of his deemed confirmation , which is a positive act and to be declared as such in consultation with the upsc in the present case with a sine qua non condition precedent of satisfactorily completion of service. in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on : Jul-29-2003
Reported in : (2004)(2)SLJ185CAT
..... had been discriminated against in that while he has been recommended to be dealt with under article 311(2)(c), dig, bsf had been dealt with under section 20 of the act, giving him an opportunity to explain his case, which has in fact enabled him to continue in service, in spite of the order of removal issued in ..... place before the court or tribunal the relevant material on the basis of which the satisfaction was arrived at subject to a claim of privilege under sections 123 and 124 of the evidence act to withhold production of a particular documentor record. even in cases where such a privilege is claimed the government concerned must disclose before the court ..... only applicant but other officers including dig ashok kumar has been indicated and course of action was suggested. accordingly, ashok kumar who was terminated resorting to section 20 of the b.s.f. act. however, the orders have been set aside by the division bench of jammu and kashmir high court on 21.4.1999, against which slp preferred .....
Tag this Judgment!