Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Year: 2006 Page 72 of about 5,300 results (0.220 seconds)

Manoj Kumar Kurre Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2006CriLJ2299

..... the facts and circumstances of the case, i am of the considered opinion that none of the conditions necessary for refusing to grant fail to the juvenile offender under section 12 of the act exist in the present case. the applicant is, therefore, in my considered opinion, entitled to be released on bail. this criminal revision is allowed. order dated ..... below have not given any cogent reasons which would go to show that one of the conditions necessary as aforesaid exist, for refusing to grant bail under section 12 of the act.5. upon a careful perusal of the case diary, it appears that no report was lodged on the date of occurrence since a compromise had been effected ..... defeat the ends of justice. thus, the existence of one of the three conditions mentioned above was a sine qua non for refusing to grant bail under section 12 of the act. learned counsel drew my attention to the order dated 23-11-2005 passed by the juvenile justice board which shows that juvenile justice board has refused to .....

Shaji Vs. Kerala State Co-operative Marketing Federation Ltd.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : I(2007)BC294; 2006(2)KLT289

..... -operative marketing federation limited had filed a complaint before the chief judicial magistrate's court, thiruvananthapuram, alleging that the accused have committed offence under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act. first accused is the kalayapuram girivarga service co-operative society and a2 and a3 are the secretary and president respectively of that society.2. ..... state government, as the case may be, he shall not be liable for prosecution under this chapter.(2) notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), where any offence under this act has been committed by a company and it is proved that the offence has been committed with the consent or connivance of, or is ..... or other association of individuals; and(b) 'director', in relation to a firm, means a partner in the firm.as per section 141(1) of the act if the person committing an offence under section 138 is a company, every person who, at the time the offence was committed, was in charge of, and was responsible .....

Bhandari General Store and ors. Vs. Makhan Singh Grewal

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2006)143PLR167

..... than one residential or scheduled building inclusive of any part or parts thereof if it is let out in part or parts. however, sub-section (2) of section 13b of the act clearly provides that a non-resident indian landlord can recover the immediate possession of residential building or scheduled building and/or non-residential building, ..... be treated as separate building. therefore, the respondent-landlord can not seek ejectment of the petitioners on the ground of his personal requirement under section 13-b of the act.6. on the other hand, counsel for the respondent-landlord submits that in the facts and circumstances of the present case, each shop cannot ..... the petitioners have made only two submissions. firstly, that the respondent-landlord has already got evicted one tenant from part of the demised building under section 13-b of the act, therefore, he cannot get ejectment of all the other tenants, including the petitioners, from the other shops. secondly, that the requirement of the .....

Bpdl Investments (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Maple Leaf Trading International (Pvt ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : III(2006)BC482; 129(2006)DLT94; 2006(87)DRJ761

..... the dates in the cheque. if this were to be the case then the cheques would become void by virtue of the provisions of section 87 of the negotiable instruments act, 1881.12. the learned counsel for the plaintiff stated that the defense that is being sought to be raised by the defendant is clearly ..... air1966ap267 ).11. this clearly indicates that the insertion of a date where there was no date amounts to a material alteration, as contemplated under section 87 of the negotiable instruments act, 1881. the only question that remains to be seen in this case is whether this material alteration was with the consent of the defendant and ..... there is any material alteration in any negotiable instrument then such an alteration, by virtue of the provisions of section 87 of the negotiable instruments act, would render such an instrument void. section 87 of the negotiable instruments act, 1881 reads as under:87. effect of material alteration.- any material alteration of a negotiable instrument renders the .....

Sh. Raghu Nath Pandey and anr. Vs. Sh. Bobby Bedi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2006(89)DRJ40

..... , inasmuch as, what kind of exhibition of films would violate articles 21 and 25 of the constitution of india or would be against the provisions contained in section 5b of the act of 1952, is no more res-integra and that being so, it would be appropriate to advert to judicial precedents on issue straightaway. hon'ble supreme court ..... or screening of seriall titled 'tamas' in the context of fundamental rights of the petitioner under articles 21 and 25 of the constitution of india as also section 5b of the act of 1952. the petitioner who was a practicing lawyer in the bombay high court, had approached hon'ble supreme court by means of the petition under article ..... portrays the unity of the country cannot be shown in a variety show or a cultural programme of a school as an item. in our considered opinion if section 5a of cinematograph act and rules framed there under, guidelines framed by the central government and art. 51a-(a) of the constitution and above all the apex court decision rendered .....

Prem Chand Garg Vs. Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation L ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2006)143PLR119

..... 12.2003 the petitioner moved an application to withdraw/return the original application under section 14 read with section 17 of the act for presentation to this court. the application was returned on 6.12.2003. subsequently, the petitioner withdraw the suit for permanent injunction filed before ..... 22.7.2003 dismissed the application for the grant of ad interim injunction and held that the petitioner should have moved an application under section 14 read with section 17 of the act before this court alone and that the petitioner has not been prosecuting his case with due diligence. after the said order, on 2. ..... some time has passed, this court will not permit the illegalities to be perpetuated.15. the petitioner has sought the return of the application under section 14 of the act, but such return is immaterial and inconsequential as the order passed by the first appellate court is patently illegal. the technicalities in seeking remedy by .....

Jai Prakash @ Prakash Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2006(2)Raj1548; 2006(3)WLC544

..... cogent and convincing evidence, he denies the factum of last seen. hence, the appellant has failed to discharge the burden under section 106 of the evidence act.16. presumption is not alien to criminal jurisprudence. section 114 of the evidence of any fact which it thinks likely to have happened, regard being had to the common course of ..... is upon him. 14. in the case of state of west bengal v. mir mohammad omar : 2000crilj4047 the hon'ble supreme court while dealing with section 106 of the evidence act has stated : this section is not intended to relieve the prosecution of its burden to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. but the ..... the child had died due to asphyxia. hence, his death was homicidal.13. section 106 of the evidence act imposes a burden on the accused to prove the fact which is especially within his knowledge. section 106 of the evidence act reads as under: section 106. burden of proving fact especially within knowledge--when any fact is especially within .....

Dnyaneshwar Vs. Namdeo and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007ACJ2307

..... recording the evidence, allowed the application filed by petitioner partly and awarded an amount of rs. 2,50,000 towards compensation, inclusive of no fault liability under section 140 of motor vehicles act to the petitioner. the respondent nos. 1 and 2 are further directed to pay the amount of rs. 2,50,000 as compensation to the claimant together with ..... , which gives us a figure of rs. 1,000 per month and rs. 12,000 for annual income of the petitioner. having regard to schedule under section 163-a of motor vehicles act, the proper multiplier, as a guideline can be considered to be 15 with reference to the petitioner's age. the annual income of the petitioner to the ..... namdeo s/o gangadhar phulwalkar and national insurance co. ltd., who were the respondents. m.a.c.p. no. 187 of 1997 was filed under section 166 of motor vehicles act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act of 1988' for short). the amount of compensation, to the tune of rs. 4,00,000, was claimed in claim petition no. 187 of .....

Ramu Mahabir Vs. Ghurhoo Samu

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR2006All273

..... very nature of the relationship existing between the parties or some times from a peculiar handicap or disability from which that party suffers. section 111 of the evidence act read with section 16 of the contract act, the principle enshrined therein is also extendable to cases where there is a proof of a person dependent, by virtue of his ..... the sale deed validly executed, will not definitely be a finding as to amount holding that the requirements of the provisions of section 111 of evidence act read along with provisions of section 16 of the contract act were in reality fulfilled. when there was no finding recorded in favour of this aspect of the matter by the trial ..... by the trial court that no consideration in the present transaction of sale had passed from the vendee to the vendor. taking the protection of section 25(i) of the contract act, the learned counsel has tried to emphasise that even if no consideration in the present case had passed for the transfer of the property, it .....

Arbaugh Vs. Y and H Corp.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... a person . 2000e(b).[ footnote 1 ] this employee-numerosity requirement[ footnote 2 ] appears in a section headed definitions, 2000e, which also prescribes the meaning, for title vii purposes, of 12 other terms used in the act.[ footnote 3 ] congress has broadly authorized the federal courts to exercise subject-matter jurisdiction over all civil ..... s., at 247.[ footnote 9 ] the basic statutory grants of federal-court subject-matter jurisdiction are contained in 28 u. s. c. 1331 and 1332. section 1331 provides for [f]ederal-question jurisdiction, 1332 for [d]iversity of citizenship jurisdiction. a plaintiff properly invokes 1331 jurisdiction when she pleads a colorable claim ..... vii contains a separate jurisdictional provision, 42 u. s. c. 2000e 6(b), authorizing suits by the government to enjoin pattern or practice discrimination. footnote 5 section 1367(a) states: except as provided in subsections (b) and (c) or as expressly provided otherwise by federal statute, in any civil action of which .....