Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Year: 1949 Page 15 of about 527 results (0.094 seconds)

Mar 29 1949 (PC)

Vijaysingrao Balasaheb Shinde Desai Vs. Janardanrao Narayanrao Shinde ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-29-1949

Reported in : AIR1949Bom314; (1949)51BOMLR556

..... acquirer of the watan land. if there was an alienation, the alienee and his family could never become watan family within the meaning of the act, and section 2 of act v of 1886 only applied to the watan family. that is, the special law of succession laid down only applied to the original acquirer and his ..... person who was also entitled to hold the hereditary office, that, however, does not appear to be strictly consistent with the provisions of the watan act. for instance, section 5(2) imposes a prohibition against alienation of watan property even though in respect of the office of the watandar a service commutation settlement has been ..... 309 and 285. the learned trial judge held that narayanrao was not a watandar within the meaning of the watan act and that therefore these alienations cannot be challenged under section 5 of the act. section 5 of the act contains a prohibition against alienations of watan property and watan rights, and such alienations if made cannot endure beyond the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 29 1949 (PC)

Rashid Ahmed Vs. Sahu Bisheshwar Dayal

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-29-1949

Reported in : AIR1949All554

..... might have been possible for me to afford him some relief by setting aside that order on the ground that it was not a proper order as contemplated by section 20, encumbered estates act. having not made the deposit within thirty days of 2nd january 1947, and having not appealed against the order dated 14th december 1946, the appellant has, by his ..... some relief to the appellant. i would have held that the order dated 14th december 1946, was an incomplete order and became a complete order within the meaning of section 20 of the act on 2nd january 1947, when the amount of costs was ascertained. in that view it would have been possible to hold that the order for the payment of ..... . the order of the court below to the effect that the office will mention the costs in the formal order was, therefore, not a suitable order as contemplated by section 20 of the act. the office may take a very long time, as it did in the present case, in preparing a formal order; it may in a certain case take even .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 30 1949 (PC)

F.W. Heilgers and Co. Vs. Nagesh Chandra Chakravarty

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-30-1949

Reported in : (1950)52BOMLR23

..... such an agreement being made between an employer and employee, and much less to make such agreement illegal and prohibited by the payment of wages act. section 23 of the payment of wages act also in our opinion does not support the argument of the appellant. it only prevents an employee from contracting away his rights which are given ..... the appellant thereupon filed a petition before the high court for the issue of writs of certiorari and prohibition and for an order, in effect, under section 45 of the specific relief act.2. before the high court various contentions were raised by the parties but they were not all argued before us. it appears that before the high ..... ). he contended that the claim to payment of all the three kinds of bonus could not be considered because it violated the provisions of sections 20 and 23 of the payment of wages act, and any attempt to order payment of such bonus would be illegal and therefore could not be within the jurisdiction of the tribunal appointed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 30 1949 (PC)

Jhamman Singh Vs. Ratan Lal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-30-1949

Reported in : AIR1949All480

..... sale-consideration as urged by the learned counsel for the appellant) in the following circumstances.2. on 16th april 1936, the defendant-appellant applied under section 4, u.p. encumbered estates act, after which, on 21st april 1936, the proceedings were forwarded to the special judge under an order of the collector. later, on 9th june 1936 ..... ab initio in the present case, inasmuch was the sale-deed had been executed in violation of the imperative prohibition enjoined by section 7, encumbered estates act. learned counsel further argued that article 97, limitation act, had also no application, as it could not be said that the amount claimed had been paid to the vendor-defendant ' ..... respect of a part of the property which became the subject of the proceedings under the said act. on the basis of the deed, the vendees (respondents) laid a claim to the property purchased by them under section 11 of the act. this claim was rejected on the ground that the sale-deed having been executed after the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 30 1949 (PC)

S. Mohd. Liaq and ors. Vs. Ramji and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-30-1949

Reported in : AIR1952All618

..... who was primarily liable. here the legal representative becomes the j. d., because the decree was actually passed against him. so he is described as j. d., in sub-section (2), in section 50(2) the legal representative of a deceased j. d., is described as legal representative & not as j. d.4. the word 'j. d.' is used very frequently in ..... moving of the application also but since they would merge in the application for execution itself it is not necessary to consider them for the purposes of article 182, limitation act. only those fate is which are to be taken prior to the presentation of an application for execution & which will advance the execution, are steps-in-aid within the meaning ..... . d.; for instance, rules 2, 26, 42, 43, 46, 54, 60, 61, 66, 68, 79, etc. some of these rules require some act to be compulsorily done by the court in relation to the j. d.; as the act must be done, it must be done in relation to his legal representative when he is dead. in other words, the word 'judgment .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 30 1949 (PC)

Western India Automobile Association Vs. the Industrial Tribunal

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-30-1949

Reported in : (1949)51BOMLR894

..... have no hesitation in repelling it. the argument on this point is based on the definition of the term 'employer' given in clause (g)(i) of section 2 of the act, which runs thus :'employer' means-(i) in relation to an industry carried on by or under the authority of any department of a government in british india ..... enactments was the registration and formation of trade unions and not for the purpose of defining the relations between the employers and the employees. section 28(k) of the amending act xiv of 1947 was enacted to prevent employers from interfering with the formation of trade unions and against preventing workmen from joining or helping in ..... issued by coyajee j. against the industrial tribunal to which a dispute between the western india automobile association and its workers had been referred under section 10 of the industrial disputes act, xiv of 1947.2. though a number of points were raised before coyajee j. and before the division bench, the principal question raised by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 1949 (PC)

Changa and ors. Vs. ChaudhraIn Bhagwan Dei

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-31-1949

Reported in : AIR1949All493

..... their lordships of the judicial committee in court of wards v. ilahi bakhsh 11 a.l.j. 265 at p. 269 observed as follows:the punjab land revenue act 1887, act xvii of 1887, section 44, enacts that 'an entry made in the record of rights in accordance with the law, for the time being in force, shall be presumed to be ..... suit, his statement would not be binding on the remaining defendants or, for the matter of that, on the other members of his community. now para. 2 of section 18, evidence act, provides that:statements made by parties to suits, suing or sued in a representative character, are not admissions unless they were made while the party making them held that ..... of the government in setting aside land as an open graveyard for the musalman community in multan would be frustrated.to the same effect are the provisions of section 44, u.p. land revenue act, and they must consequently be given the same meaning.14. the entry of the word 'banjar,' therefore, was of no avail, and it only showed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 1949 (PC)

Natvarlal Punjabhai and ors. Vs. Dadubhai Manubhai and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-31-1949

Reported in : AIR1950Bom55

..... v. golap bhagat 40 cal. 721: 19 i.c. 273 . the learned judge states at p. 771 that 'the theory of relinquishment is foreshadowed in the dayabhaga, chap. xi, section 1, para. 59, where jimutavahana laid down that the persons who would be the next heirs on failure of prior claimants, succeed to the residue of the estate remaining after ..... by a limited owner. and krishnan j. further points out that surrenders are effected for the purpose of defeating alienees, and because of this till the surrenderer dies, her acts could not be questioned by the surrenderee, and that according to the learned judge seems to be a just and equitable rule. if that is so, why not impose ..... or, to put it in other words, the widow constitutes an impediment or obstruction between the last full owner and the next full owner, and she by a voluntary act of hers removes that impediment by surrendering the whole of the estate which has come to her from her husband. the next decision of the privy council is rangasami gounden .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 1949 (PC)

Damodar Das Vs. Mt. Godawari and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-31-1949

Reported in : AIR1949P& H391

..... by long practice and confirmed by a series of decisions that a hindu widow can renounce the estate in favour of the nearest reversioner, and by a voluntary act efface herself from the succession as effectively as if she had then died. this voluntary self-effacement is sometimes referred to as a surrender, sometimes as a relinquishment ..... to jai narain, defendant 2, was without consideration and valid necessity and was not binding on the reversioners; that moti ram, the nearest reversioner, had by his acts disentitled himself from bringing a suit and that accordingly the plain, tiff as a remote reversioner had filed the suit. the relief prayed for is a declaration that the ..... did not pursue that matter any further.4. in the meantime on 4th october 1941i sagar mal, another brother of gopal sahai, applied under the guardians and wards act to the court of the senior sub-judge of rohtak for getting himself appointed guardian of the persons and properties of both moti ram and bhup singh. godawari .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 04 1949 (FN)

Farrell Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Apr-04-1949

..... limitation on maintenance and cure. when congress has had under consideration substitution of a system of workmen's compensation on the principles of the longshoremen's and harbor workers' compensation act, 44 stat. 1424, as amended, 33 u.s.c. 901-950, organized seamen, as we have heretofore noted, have steadfastly opposed the change. hust v. moore-mccormack lines, 328 u ..... u. s. 521 . page 336 u. s. 512 mr. justice jackson delivered the opinion of the court. petitioner, a seaman, brought suit in admiralty to recover damages under the jones act, and maintenance, cure and wages under maritime law. the issue of negligence was decided against him by both courts below, and the claim is abandoned here. petition for certiorari to .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //