Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Year: 1949 Page 17 of about 527 results (0.395 seconds)

Gauri Ram Vs. Jaishi Ram and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1950HP1

..... sale in execution of a decree is duly confirmed by an order of the courtand has become absolute under rule 92 of order 21, civil p. c., an application under section 47, civil p. o, does not lie, the only remedy is by way of a suit: ramasami konan v. kulandaivelu pillai, a. i. r. (9) 1922 mad 63 ..... of this article (article 12), by seeking reliefs which though different are inconsistent with the validity of the sale. their lordships further observe as follows : 'the limitation act protects bona fide purchasers at judicial sales by providing' a 'abort limit of time within which suits may be brought to set them aside. if the protection is to ..... is to vanish directly some other relief consequential on the annulment of the saleis sought, the protection is exceedingly small..... both the letter and spirit of the limitation act require that this suit when looked on to set aside a sale should fall within the prohibition of the article.'23. article 95 provides three years limitation'when the .....

Banwari Lal Varma Vs. Amrit Sagar Gupta and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1949P& H400

..... is, however, quite clear from the code of civil procedure that in the case of a civil suit it is contemplated that the judgment and decree should be quite distinct. section 33 of the code lays down that the court after a case has been heard shall pronounce judgment and on such judgment the decree shall follow. again, order 20, rule .....

Debi Pershad Vs. Choudhari Brothers Ltd. and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1949P& H357

..... to be entitled to the effects of the deceased person or to any part thereof, or....it would appear from the provisions of section 92(2), civil p.c., section 270(1), government of india act, 1935, and section 214 (1) of act xxxix [39] of 1928 that where the legislature has intended to prohibit the institution of a suit the legislature has made an ..... in his discretion, and in the case of a person employed in connection with the affairs of a province, of the governor of that province in his discretion.again, section 214(1) of act xxxk [39] of 1925 enacts:no court shall,(a) pass a decree against a debtor of a deceased person for payment of his debt to a person claiming ..... a suit for the eviction of a tenant in possession of a building or rented land.9. as i read the section 1 find that there is no such implied prohibition in section 13(1) of the act. on the other hand, section 13(1) contemplates decree being passed in a suit for the eviction of a tenant in possession of a building or .....

Gilmour Vs. Coats and Others

Court : House of Lords

..... , " but solely designed to benefit individuals associated for the purpose of " securing that benefit, which may not have some repercussions or consequential effects beneficial to some section of the general community: and unless a further and sweeping inroad is to be made on the rule against perpetuities, the line must be drawn somewhere. cocks v ..... be devoted for ever to a religious purpose are compelled to accept as true any doctrine of a particular religion which ascribes efficacy, spiritual or temporal, to acts which that religion enjoins upon its followers, cannot i think be sound. the learned chief baron spoke of a hypothetical admission of the truth of the religious ..... m.r., said (at p. 396): monasteries of men and women are often, if not mostly, institutions the members of which devote their lives exclusively to acts of piety such as pious meditation, prayer and self-denial. such institutions, however praise-worthy, are not charitable in the sense recognised by this court. in munster .....

Shreedhar Mahadeo Paranjape Vs. State Through Police

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1950MP9; 1950CriLJ655

..... that an order for his release from custody be made as it was illegal and improper. immediately after the application had been made another communication under section 5 of the act stating the grounds of his detention was sent to the petitioner by the district magistrate. the grounds furnished this second time were couched in these terms: ..... some of his friends.3. these are the brief facts of the case. i may say at once that what purported to be grounds under section 5, maintenance of public order act and which were communicated to the petitioner on 24th march are no grounds at all. they are mere generalisations stating the effects which are likely ..... march 1949 the applicant was arrested by the deputy superintendent of police, indore city, by the order of the district magistrate, indore district, made under section 3(2), maintenance of public order act (vil [7] of 1949). on 24th march were communicated to the applicant the grounds on which the order had been made against him as required .....

Bhagi and anr. Vs. the Crown

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1950HP35

..... two accused, bhagi and bholar 13. the learned judge was not correct in using the confession of moti against two other accused, bhagi and bholar. section 30, evidence act provides: 'when more persons than one are being tried jointly for the same offence, and a confession made by one of such persons affecting himself ..... if it were not retracted, could not be used against the two other accused, bhagi and bbolar, under section 30, evidence act. i, therefore, hold that neither the statements under section 164, criminal p. c., nor the confession of moti could be taken into consideration to determine the guilt of the appellants. ..... he was ultimately acquitted of that charge and convicted under section 411, penal code. 16. i, therefore, find that all the three accused were not charged under section 460, penal code. moreover, moti was never charged under section 302 or section 467, penal code. therefore, section 80, evidence act, does not apply and the confession of moti even .....

NuruddIn AbdulhuseIn Vs. Abu Ahmed Abdul Jalli

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1950Bom127; (1949)51BOMLR1020

..... the proceedings.2. such a question has not arisen for determination either in england or in india for the simple reason that both under section 4, english arbitration act, and under section 19, arbitration act of 1899, a step in the proceedings taken 'at any time after appearance' disqualifies the defendant from applying for stay, with the result ..... may say so with respect, these observations, so far as they go, are unexceptionable; but they do not obviously cover some acts which unquestionably are steps in the proceedings. for example, the section itself, when it refers to 'before filing a written statement or taking any other steps in the proceedings', clearly indicates that filing ..... that it prevented the defendant from applying for a stay of the suit. section 34, arbitration act of 1940, which takes the place of section 19 of the act of 1899, omits the words 'at any time after appearance' and the relevant words of the section now are:'any party to such legal proceedings may, at any time .....

V.M.R. Malaiperumal Pillai Vs. the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative So ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1950Mad63

..... that at any time after the receipt of the reference by the society, either the registrar or the deputy registrar decided under clause (c) of sub-section (2) of section 51 of the act, to refer it for disposal by arbitration. obviously, if there had been such a decision, the reference must have been made either to a single arbitrator ..... arbitrator or arbitrators. the rules prescribe that where on receipt of a reference under sub-rule (1) the registrar decides under clause (c) of sub-section (2) of section 51 of the act, to refer it for decision by arbitration, a reference shall be made either to a single arbitrator appointed by the registrar or to a body of ..... claim for rs. 8963-5-7 alleged to be due and owing to the society by the petitioner. this claim was apparently made under section 61, madras co-operative societies act, act vi [6] of 1932, sub-section (1) of which says that if any dispute touching the business of a registered society arises inter alia between the society and its officers .....

Ahmed HosseIn Vs. Mt. Chembelli and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1951Cal262

..... . adya nath, a. i. r. (31) 1944 pat. 77 : (22 pat. 513) as an authority foe the contrary proposition. there a notice of forfeiture of a lease under section 111(g), t. p. act seems to have been held to be a condition precedent. with great respect i am unable to agree if such was the decision. the learned judges give no ..... be liable to compensate the holder in case of dishonour 'provided due notice of dishonour has been given to, or received by, the drawer as hereinafter provided.' sections 91 to 98 of the act lay down the provisions relating to the manner of the giving of the notice of dishonour and the cases where the giving of the notice is excused. the ..... duty which has been cast upon courts so that substantial justice may be done for which alone courts exist. in the words of bowen l. j. in cropper v. smith, (1884) 26 ch. d. 700 at pp. 710-11,'now i think it is a well established principle that the object of courts is to decide the rights of the parties .....

Sudhindra Nath Dutt Vs. the King

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1952Cal422

..... . amongst other things they are importers & distributors of eno's fruit salt, germolene and brylcream. it is said that on 14-5-1948, they received an order from messrs. section n. siddique & sons of 2 waterworks road - dacca for the supply of 100 cases of eno's fruit salt, 50 cases of germolene and 50 cases of brylcream by a ..... through the instrumentality of amal that das gupta succeeded in occupying the room at 5/1, bindu bashini street. the defence suggests that amal's surrender was another friendly act intended to shield sudhangsu. it is unnecessary for us to pursue this matter any further.14. the test identification parade held on 17-6-1948 was only in respect ..... we only desire to state that even on his own evidence it was incumbent on him to insist on the production of the certificate of registration under the sales tax act which he did not do.19. from all these circumstances the inference is not unreasonable that sopher & his employees were not victims of a foul conspiracy to cheat as .....