Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Year: 1949 Page 11 of about 527 results (0.151 seconds)

Mar 14 1949 (PC)

Sankaranarayanan Iyer Vs. Sri Poovananathaswami Temple, Through Execut ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-14-1949

Reported in : (1949)2MLJ171

..... a de jure trustee of a public religious endowment can be removed only for misconduct and that only in a suit instituted with the sanction prescribed by section 92, civil procedure code or section 73 of madras act ii of 1927. where, however, there is-only, a de facto trustee functioning as such, it is open to persons interested in the trust to ..... with a view to protect the interests of religious endowments as well as the rights of persons dealing with shebaits or managers, the indian legislature has amended section 10 of the limitation act by providing that managers of property comprised in a hindu religious endowment are deemed to be express, trustees thereof and has also enacted article 134-a to ..... of the trust. i do not think that a trustee de son tort in relation to the trust property can be regarded as a constructive trustee under section 94 of the trusts act. in this country, the position of a person, who, in england, would be described as a trustee de son tort is that of an express .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 14 1949 (FN)

Stainback Vs. Mo Hock Ke Lok Po

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-14-1949

..... 620 , 326 u. s. 622 . atlas life ins. co. v. w. i. southern, inc., 306 u. s. 563 , 306 u. s. 568 : "section 11 of the judiciary act of 1789, 1 stat. 78, provided that the circuit courts should have 'cognizance . . . of all suits of a civil nature at common law or in equity' in cases ..... under circumstances that would require its application in a similar suit in a state. congress, in discussing an amendment to the mann-elkins act, which amendment evolved into this section, considered the geographical difficulties inherent in the requirement of a three-judge court and the burden thus place on the functioning of the federal ..... party to any civil or criminal case, before or after rendition of judgment or decree. . . ." [ footnote 2 ] session laws of hawaii 1943, act 104, revised laws of hawaii 1945, c. 31. [ footnote 3 ] "sec. 1872. definitions. as used in this chapter: " "'school' means any person, firm, group of persons, unincorporated association, corporation, establishment, or institution .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 14 1949 (FN)

Commissioner Vs. Phipps

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-14-1949

..... virtue of the sansome rule, earnings and profits of the parent, whatever the ultimate treatment of the deficits of the other subsidiaries. [ footnote 5 ] section 201 of the 1921 act specifies what corporate distributions are taxable as dividends; 202(c)(2) provides for the nonrecognition of gain or loss from certain corporate reorganizations. [ footnote 6 ..... again are available: the liquidation may take the form of a sale outright, or may be performed within the framework of the reorganization sections of the internal revenue code or its predecessor acts. if the former, gain is, of course, realized, and is also recognized for tax purposes. we note in passing, in this ..... 115(h) harmonize with 112(b)(6) and (7), and regulations 101, promulgated under the 1938 act, was amended to conform. the internal revenue code contains the section substantially unchanged. section 501 of the second revenue act of 1940 added 115(1) to the internal revenue code to elaborate the law with regard to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 14 1949 (FN)

Black Diamond S.S. Vs. Stewart and Sons, Ltd.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-14-1949

..... . 4285 -- the option of depositing cash or "approved security," the discretion granted the court to require additional deposits if "necessary to carry out the provisions of section 4283," and the alternative of transferring the vessel and freight to a trustee -- is one of concern with protecting the assets from which the claimants' satisfaction must ..... loss, damage, or forfeiture, done, occasioned, or incurred, without the privity or knowledge of such owner or owners, shall not, except in the cases provided for in subsection (b) of this section, exceed the amount or value of the interest of such owner ..... [ footnote 2 ] "sec. 4283. (a) the liability of the owner of any vessel, whether american or foreign, for any embezzlement, loss, or destruction by any person of any property, goods, or merchandise shipped or put on board of such vessel, or for any loss, damage, or injury by collision, or for any act, matter, or thing, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 16 1949 (PC)

Sashi Ammal Vs. Ps. Ar. Ar. Arunachalam Chettiar by Agent, Sivaraman C ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-16-1949

Reported in : (1949)1MLJ658

..... same bench had occasion to refer to that decision in papammal v. ramaswami chettar : air1942mad726 , where the learned judges pointed out the difference between the requirements of section 19 of madras act iv of 1938 and the requirements to be proved in a suit itself where the debt had to be scaled down in accordance with the provisions of the ..... was embodied in palani goundan v. peria goundan : air1941mad158 , should be taken merely as obiter dicta. it is a clear pronouncement of what were the requirements of section 19 of the act. as i have already said, i agree with the courts below in holding that the fifth defendant had no saleable interest on 29th may, 1944, the date ..... of her application under section 19 of the act.6. independently of the fifth defendant's right to have the debt scaled down is the other question, put forward for the first time during arguments in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 16 1949 (PC)

Sashi Bhusan Dey and ors. Vs. Rai Chand Bural and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-16-1949

Reported in : AIR1950Cal333

..... , make any separate assessment of extra compensation on this ground, as i do not consider the justice of the case so requires under para. 3 of section 19, specifics relief act.34. accordingly i answer issue no. 6 in the affirmative and i award and assess compensation at the rate of rs. 150 per mouth from 26th ..... end of june 1946. i, therefore, would have awarded compensation to the plaintiffs for the loss as contemplated in the statutory illustration of para. 3 of section 19, specific relief act, from 1st july 1946 but i find that the purchasers solicitors approved title by sending draft conveyance only on 18th april 1947. in my opinion the proper ..... bahadur soshi bhusan dey under the agreement for sale and not the other two plaintiffs. this objection i consider to be completely without substance under section 55(1)(f), transfer of property act, which provides that the seller shall give possession to the buyer 'or such other person as he directs'. besides by letters dated 4th may 1947 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 17 1949 (PC)

Joy Chand Lal Babu Vs. Kamalaksha Chaudhury

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-17-1949

Reported in : (1949)51BOMLR964

..... proving that this was a commercial loan.13. there remains the further question of whether the mortgage suit in the present case is a suit to which the act applies within section 86 of the act. section 2(22) defines such a suit as being a suit or proceeding instituted or filed on or after january 1, 1930, or pending on that date. ..... objection on the principle laid down by this board in rajah amir hussan khan v. sheo baksh singh (1884) i.r. 11 i.a. 237 and balakrishna udayar v. vasudeva aiyar and now firmly established, that a subordinate court does not act illegally or with material irregularity because it decides wrongly a matter within its competence. a court has jurisdiction ..... ) or sub-section. (6) of section 115 of the code, and sub-section (c) of the section can be ignored.babu ram v. munna lal i.l.r. (1927) all. 454 and hari bhikaji v. naro vishvanath i.l.r. (1885) bom. 432 disapproved.rajah amir hussan khan v. sheo baksh singh (1884) l.r. 11 indap 237 and balakrishna udayar v. vusudeea .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 17 1949 (PC)

Joy Chand Lal Babu Vs. Kamalaksha Chaudhury and Others

Court : Privy Council

Decided on : Mar-17-1949

Reported in : AIR1949PC239

..... that this was a commercial loan. 13. then remains the further question of whether the mortgage suit in the present case is a suit to which the act applies within s. 36 of the act. section 2(22) defines such a suit as being a suit or proceeding instituted or filed on or after 1st january 1939, or pending on that date. the ..... of the limits specified in cls. 1 and 2 of s. 30. for the purposes of this appeal it is not necessary to consider these powers in detail. section 40 (5) of the act provides that in any suit or proceeding the burden of proving that a loan is a commercial loan shall be on the money-lender who advanced the loan ..... in the court of the subordinate judge at burdwan asking for relief under ss. 30 and 36 of the act. [7] the act was passed on 1st august 1940, and the following provisions of it are relevant to this appeal: "section 2. in this act, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context - (4) 'commercial loan' means a loan advanced to any .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 1949 (PC)

Official Receiver, West Tanjore and anr. Vs. Sakkuwar Bai Ammal

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-18-1949

Reported in : AIR1950Mad197

..... phillips and kumaraswami sastri jj. have held that a sale in a revenue court passes the property to the purchaser free of encumbrances except those specified in section 125, madras estates land act. therefore, it is apparent that if the appellant is allowed to bring the holding to sale in a revenue court, he will get an undoubted advantage ..... the three bench rulings and the single judge's ruling referred to above.5. mr. subramania pillai contends that, in view of the amendment to sections 125 and 127, madras estates land act, the views expressed in those four rulings have become obsolete and that now the appellant will be free to bring the holding to sale in the ..... revenue court and realise his decree dues. i cannot agree. as already stated, the amendments of section 128 and 127 have only emphasised the benefit accruing .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 1949 (PC)

The Raghuvanshi Mills, Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-18-1949

Reported in : (1949)51BOMLR675

..... statute. but as i read the judgment of the privy council, it is not on the construction of any particular section that these observations of the privy council are based. the privy council has laid down a general principle which is as much applicable to the british columbia taxation ..... as the risk insured against materialized.4. sir jamshedji has attempted to distinguish this case on the ground that the privy council was considering the british columbia taxation act and it would be unwise to apply those observations of the privy council based upon the construction of one taxation statute to the provisions of a different taxation ..... act as to our own income-tax act, because the definition of 'income' under our act is a very wide one and it covers innumerable cases. i am, therefore, of the opinion that the amount received by .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //